Toward Tutoring Help Seeking
The goal of our research is to investigate whether a Cognitive Tutor can be made more effective by extending it to help students acquire help-seeking skills. We present a preliminary model of help-seeking behavior that will provide the basis for a Help-Seeking Tutor Agent. The model, implemented by 57 production rules, captures both productive and unproductive help-seeking behavior. As a first test of the model’s efficacy, we used it off-line to evaluate students’ help-seeking behavior in an existing data set of student-tutor interactions, We found that 72% of all student actions represented unproductive help-seeking behavior. Consistent with some of our earlier work (Aleven & Koedinger, 2000) we found a proliferation of hint abuse (e.g., using hints to find answers rather than trying to understand). We also found that students frequently avoided using help when it was likely to be of benefit and often acted in a quick, possibly undeliberate manner. Students’ help-seeking behavior accounted for as much variance in their learning gains as their performance at the cognitive level (i.e., the errors that they made with the tutor). These findings indicate that the help-seeking model needs to be adjusted, but they also underscore the importance of the educational need that the Help-Seeking Tutor Agent aims to address.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Koedinger, K.R.: Towards Computer-Based Tutoring of Help-Seeking Skills. In: Karabenick, S., Newman, R. (eds.) Help Seeking in Academic Settings: Goals, Groups, and Contexts, Erlbaum, Mahwah (to appear)Google Scholar
- Arroyo, I., Beck, J.E., Beal, C.R., Wing, R.: Analyzing students’response to help provision in an elementary mathematics intelligent tutoring system. In: Luckin, R. (ed.) Papers of the AIED 2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 34–46 (2001)Google Scholar
- Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R. (eds.): How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington (2000)Google Scholar
- Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C.: Guided Discovery in a Community of Learners. In: McGilly, K. (ed.) Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice, pp. 229–270. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
- Conati, C., VanLehn, K.: Toward computer-based support of meta-cognitive skills: A computational framework to coach self-explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 398–415 (2000)Google Scholar
- Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H.: Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Kluwer, Boston (1985)Google Scholar
- Karabenick, S.A. (ed.): Strategic help seeking. Implications for learning and teaching. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1998)Google Scholar
- Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., Mark, M.A.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8, 30–43 (1997)Google Scholar
- Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Ritter, S., Shapiro, L.: Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive TutorTM: Summary Research Results. White paper.Available from Carnegie Learning Inc., 1200 Penn Avenue, Suite 150, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, E-mail: email@example.com, Web (2000), http://www.carnegielearning.com
- Newman, R.S.: Adaptive help seeking: a strategy of self-regulated learning. In: Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J. (eds.) Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications, pp. 283–301. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1994)Google Scholar
- Schworm, S., Renkl, A.: Learning by solved example problems: Instructional explanations reduce self-explanation activity. In: Gray, W.D., Schunn, C.D. (eds.) Proceeding of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 816–821. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
- Wood, D.: Scaffolding, contingent tutoring, and computer-supported learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12 (2001)Google Scholar