Toward Tutoring Help Seeking

Applying Cognitive Modeling to Meta-cognitive Skills
  • Vincent Aleven
  • Bruce McLaren
  • Ido Roll
  • Kenneth Koedinger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3220)


The goal of our research is to investigate whether a Cognitive Tutor can be made more effective by extending it to help students acquire help-seeking skills. We present a preliminary model of help-seeking behavior that will provide the basis for a Help-Seeking Tutor Agent. The model, implemented by 57 production rules, captures both productive and unproductive help-seeking behavior. As a first test of the model’s efficacy, we used it off-line to evaluate students’ help-seeking behavior in an existing data set of student-tutor interactions, We found that 72% of all student actions represented unproductive help-seeking behavior. Consistent with some of our earlier work (Aleven & Koedinger, 2000) we found a proliferation of hint abuse (e.g., using hints to find answers rather than trying to understand). We also found that students frequently avoided using help when it was likely to be of benefit and often acted in a quick, possibly undeliberate manner. Students’ help-seeking behavior accounted for as much variance in their learning gains as their performance at the cognitive level (i.e., the errors that they made with the tutor). These findings indicate that the help-seeking model needs to be adjusted, but they also underscore the importance of the educational need that the Help-Seeking Tutor Agent aims to address.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: An effective meta-cognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science 26(2), 147–179 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: Limitations of Student Control: Do Student Know when they need help? In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 292–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M., Koedinger, K.R.: Towards Computer-Based Tutoring of Help-Seeking Skills. In: Karabenick, S., Newman, R. (eds.) Help Seeking in Academic Settings: Goals, Groups, and Contexts, Erlbaum, Mahwah (to appear)Google Scholar
  4. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F.: &Wallace, R.M. Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments. Review of Educational Research 73(2), 277–320 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 167–207 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arroyo, I., Beck, J.E., Beal, C.R., Wing, R.: Analyzing students’response to help provision in an elementary mathematics intelligent tutoring system. In: Luckin, R. (ed.) Papers of the AIED 2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 34–46 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R.: Detecting Student Misuse of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 531–540. Springer, Heidelberg (2004) (in Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R. (eds.): How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington (2000)Google Scholar
  9. Brown, A.L., Campione, J.C.: Guided Discovery in a Community of Learners. In: McGilly, K. (ed.) Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice, pp. 229–270. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  10. Conati, C., VanLehn, K.: Toward computer-based support of meta-cognitive skills: A computational framework to coach self-explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 398–415 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4, 253–278 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dutke, S., Reimer, T.: Evaluation of two types of online help information for application software: Operative and function-oriented help. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning 16, 307–315 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H.: Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Kluwer, Boston (1985)Google Scholar
  14. Karabenick, S.A. (ed.): Strategic help seeking. Implications for learning and teaching. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1998)Google Scholar
  15. Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., Mark, M.A.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8, 30–43 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Ritter, S., Shapiro, L.: Carnegie Learning’s Cognitive TutorTM: Summary Research Results. White paper.Available from Carnegie Learning Inc., 1200 Penn Avenue, Suite 150, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, E-mail:, Web (2000),
  17. Luckin, R., Hammerton, L.: Getting to know me: Helping learners understand their own learning needs through meta-cognitive scaffolding. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 759–771. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKendree, J.: Effective feedback content for tutoring complex skills. Human Computer Interaction 5, 381–413 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson-LeGall, S.: Help-seeking: An understudied problem-solving skill in children. Developmental Review 1, 224–246 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newman, R.S.: Adaptive help seeking: a strategy of self-regulated learning. In: Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J. (eds.) Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications, pp. 283–301. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1994)Google Scholar
  21. Palincsar, A.S., Brown, A.L.: Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1, 117–175 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Renkl, A.: Learning from worked-out examples: Instructional explanations supplement selfexplanations. Learning and Instruction 12, 529–556 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ryan, A.M., Gheen, M.H., Midgley, C.: Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students’ academic efficacy, teachers’ social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology 90(3), 528–535 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schworm, S., Renkl, A.: Learning by solved example problems: Instructional explanations reduce self-explanation activity. In: Gray, W.D., Schunn, C.D. (eds.) Proceeding of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 816–821. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  25. Trafton, J.G., Trickett, S.B.: Note-taking for self-explanation and problem solving. Human-Computer Interaction 16, 1–38 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. White, B., Frederiksen, J.: Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 16(1), 3–117 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wood, D.: Scaffolding, contingent tutoring, and computer-supported learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12 (2001)Google Scholar
  28. Wood, H., Wood, D.: Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education 33, 153–169 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Aleven
    • 1
  • Bruce McLaren
    • 1
  • Ido Roll
    • 1
  • Kenneth Koedinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Human-Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon University 

Personalised recommendations