Advertisement

Fast Automated Segmentation and Reproducible Volumetry of Pulmonary Metastases in CT-Scans for Therapy Monitoring

  • Jan-Martin Kuhnigk
  • Volker Dicken
  • Lars Bornemann
  • Dag Wormanns
  • Stefan Krass
  • Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3217)

Abstract

The assessment of metastatic growth under chemotherapy belongs to the daily radiological routine and is currently performed by manual measurements of largest nodule diameters. As in lung cancer screening where 3d volumetry methods have already been developed by other groups, computer assistance would be beneficial to improve speed and reliability of growth assessment. We propose a new morphology and model based approach for the fast and reproducible volumetry of pulmonary nodules that was explicitly developed to be applicable to lung metastases which are frequently large, not necessarily spherical, and often complexly attached to vasculature and chest wall. A database of over 700 nodules from more than 50 patient CT scans from various scanners was used to test the algorithm during development. An in vivo reproducibility study was conducted concerning the volumetric analysis of 105 metastases from 8 patients that were subjected to a low dose CT scan twice within several minutes. Low median volume deviations in inter-observer (0.1%) and inter-scan (4.7%) tests and a negligible average computation time of 0.3 seconds were measured. The experiments revealed that clinically significant volume change can be detected reliably by the method.

Keywords

Chest Wall Segmentation Result Pulmonary Nodule Seed Point Lung Cancer Screening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Kostis, W.J., Reeves, A.P., Yankelevitz, D.F., Henschke, C.I.: Three-dimensional segmentation and growth-rate estimation of small pulmonary nodules in helical CT images. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging 22(10), 1259–1274 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wormanns, D., Kohl, G., Klotz, E., et al.: Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility. Eur. Radiol. 14(1), 86–92 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ko, J.P., Rusinek, H., Jacobs, E.L., et al.: Small Pulmonary Nodules:Volume Measurement at Chest CT – Phantom Study. Radiology 228(3), 864–870 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armato III, S.G., Giger, M.L., Moran, C.J., et al.: Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans. Radiographics 19(5), 1303–1311 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, M.S., McNitt-Gray, M.F., Goldin, J.G., et al.: Patient-specific models for lung nodule detection and surveillance in CT images. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imaging 20, 1242–1250 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinhardt, J.M., Guo, J., Zhang, L., et al.: Integrated System for Objective Assessment of Global and Regional Lung Structure. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, pp. 1384–1385. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuhnigk, J.M., Hahn, H.K., Hindennach, M., et al.: Lung Lobe Segmentation by Anatomy-Guided 3D Watershed Transform. In: Proc. of SPIE Medical Imaging 2003, vol. 5032, pp. 1482–1490 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sonka, M., Hlavac, V., Boyle, R.: Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision, 2nd edn. International Thomson Publishing (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bruijns, J.: Fully-Automatic Lebelling of Aneurysm Voxels for Volume Estimation. In: Proc. of Bildverarbeitung fuer die Medizin, pp. 51–55 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bland, J.M., Altman, D.G.: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (8476), 307–310 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hahn, H.K., Link, F., Peitgen, H.O.: Concepts for a Rapid Prototyping Platform in Medical Image Analysis and Visualization. In: Proc. SimVis, pp. 283–298. SCS (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan-Martin Kuhnigk
    • 1
  • Volker Dicken
    • 1
  • Lars Bornemann
    • 1
  • Dag Wormanns
    • 2
  • Stefan Krass
    • 1
  • Heinz-Otto Peitgen
    • 1
  1. 1.MeVisBremenGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Clinical RadiologyUniversity of MuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations