ICIAR 2004: Image Analysis and Recognition pp 33-42 | Cite as
Fuzzy-Snake Segmentation of Anatomical Structures Applied to CT Images
Abstract
This paper presents a generic strategy to facilitate the segmentation of anatomical structures in medical images. The segmentation is performed using an adapted PDM by fuzzy c-means classification, which also uses the fuzzy decision to evolve PDM into the final contour. Furthermore, the fuzzy reasoning exploits \(\it{a}\) \(\it{priori}\) statistical information from several knowledge sources based on histogram analysis and the intensity values of the structures under consideration. The fuzzy reasoning is also applied and compared to a geometrical active contour model (or level set). The method has been developed to assist clinicians and radiologists in conformal RTP. Experimental results and their quantitative validation to assess the accuracy and efficiency are given segmenting the bladder on CT images. To assess precision, results are also presented in CT images with added Gaussian noise. The fuzzy-snake is free of parameter and it is able to properly segment the structures by using the same initial spline curve for a whole study image-patient set.
Keywords
Active Contour Model Fuzzy Reasoning Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Manual Delineation Pelvic AreaPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Duncan, J.S., Ayache, N.: Medical Image Analysis: Progress over Two Decades and the Challenges Ahead. IEEE Trans. on PAMI 22, 85–106 (2000)Google Scholar
- 2.Lee, C., Chung, P., Tsai, H.: Identifying Multiple Abdominal Organs from CT Image Series Using a Multimodule Contextual Neural Network and Spatial Fuzzy Rules. IEEE Trans. on Information Technology in Biomedicine 7 (3), 208–217 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Purdy, J.A.: 3D Treatment Planning and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy. Oncology 13, 155–168 (1999)Google Scholar
- 4.Haas, O.: Radiotherapy Treatment Planning, New System Approaches. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
- 5.Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes: Active contour models. Int. J. Comput.Vis. 14 (26), 321–331 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Yu, Z., Bajaj, C.: Image Segmentation Using Gradient Vector Diffusion and Region Merging. In: IEEE Int. Conference on Pattern Recognition (2002)Google Scholar
- 7.Malladi, R., Sethian, J.A., Vemuri, B.C.: Shape Modeling with Front Propagation: A Level Set Approach. IEEE Trans. on PAMI 17, 158–175 (1995)Google Scholar
- 8.Wang, H., Ghosh, B.: Geometric Active Deformable Models in Shape Modeling. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 9 (2), 302–308 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Caselles, V., Kimmel, R., Sapiro, G.: Geodesic Active Contours. Int. J. Comput. Vis 22 (1), 61–79 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ray, N., Havlicek, J., Acton, S.T., Pattichis, M.: Active Contour Segmentation Guided by AM-FM Dominant Componente Analysis. In: IEEE Int. Conference on Image Processing, pp. 78–81 (2001)Google Scholar
- 11.Solaiman, B., Debon, B., Pipelier, R., Cauvin, F., Roux, J.-M.: Information Fusion: Application to Data and Model Fusion for Ultrasound Image Segmentation. IEEE Trans. on BioMedical Engineering 46 (10), 1171–1175 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Mohamed, N.: A Modified Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm for Bias Field Estimation and Segmentation of MRI Data. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 21 (3), 193–200 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bueno, G., Fisher, M., Burnham, K., Haas, O.: Automatic segmentation of clinical structures for RTP: Evaluation of a morphological approach. In: MIAU Int. Conference. U.K. 22, pp. 73–76 (2001)Google Scholar
- 14.Ivins, J., Porrill, J.: Active Region Models for Segmenting Medical Images. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 227–231 (1994)Google Scholar
- 15.Chalana, V., Linker, D.T.: A Multiple Active Contour Model for Cardiac Boundary Detection on Echocardiographic Sequences. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 153, 290–298 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Udupa, J.K., LeBlancb, V.R., Schmidt, H., Ying, Y.: Methodology for Evaluating Image Segmentation Algorithms. In: Proceed. of SPIE, vol. 4684, pp. 266–277 (2002)Google Scholar