The Error of Our Ways: The Experience of Self-Reported Position in a Location-Based Game
We present a study of people’s use of positional information as part of a collaborative location-based game. The game exploits self-reported positioning in which mobile players manually reveal their positions to remote players by manipulating electronic maps. Analysis of players’ movements, position reports and communications, drawing on video data, system logs and player feedback, highlights some of the ways in which humans generate, communicate and interpret position reports. It appears that remote participants are largely untroubled by the relatively high positional error associated with self reports. Our analysis suggests that this may because mobile players declare themselves to be in plausible locations such as at common landmarks, ahead of themselves on their current trajectory (stating their intent) or behind themselves (confirming previously visited locations). These observations raise new requirements for the future development of automated positioning systems and also suggest that self-reported positioning may be a useful fallback when automated systems are unavailable or too unreliable.
KeywordsText Message Context Aware System Game Server Position Update Online Player
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, W.K., Grinter, R.E., Henderson, A., Lopes, C.: Making Sense of Sensing Systems: Five Questions for Designers and Researchers. In: Proc. CHI 2002, CHI Letters, Minneapolis, USA, April 20-25, vol. 1(1), pp. 415–422. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
- 3.Benford, S., Anastasi, R., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Crabtree, A., Greenhalgh, C., Tanda-vanitj, N., Adams, M., Row-Farr, J.: Coping with uncertainty in a location-based game. In: IEEE Pervasive Computing, September 2003, pp. 34–41. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)Google Scholar
- 4.Bjork, S., Falk, J., Hansson, R., Ljungstrand, P.: Pirates! Using the Physical World as a Game Board. In: Proc. Interact 2001. IFIP (2001)Google Scholar
- 6.Flintham, M., Anastasi, R., Benford, S.D., Hemmings, T., Crabtree, A., Greenhalgh, C.M., Rodden, T.A., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M., Row-Farr, J.: Where on-line meets on-the-streets: experiences with mobile mixed reality games. In: Proc. CHI 2003, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, April 5-10 (2003)Google Scholar
- 8.Martin, D., Bowers, J., Wastell, D.: The interactional affordances of technology: An ethnography of human-computer interaction in an ambulance control centre. In: Proc HCI 1997. BCS, pp. 263–281 (1997)Google Scholar
- 9.Newman, W., Eldridge, M., Lamming, M.: PEPYS: Generating autobiographies by automatic tracking. In: Proc. ECSCW 1991, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)Google Scholar
- 11.Starner, T., Leibe, B., Singletary, B., Pair, J.: MIND-WARPING: Towards Creating a Compelling Collaborative Augmented Reality Game. In: Intelligent User Interfaces 2000, pp. 256–259 (2000b)Google Scholar
- 14.Want, R., Schilit, B., Adams, N., Gold, R., Petersen, K., Ellis, J., Goldberg, D., Weiser, M.: The PARCTab ubiquitous computing experiment. Tech. report CSL-95-1, Xerox PARC (1995)Google Scholar