Advertisement

The Iterative Design Process of a Location-Aware Device for Group Use

  • Holger Schnädelbach
  • Boriana Koleva
  • Mike Twidale
  • Steve Benford
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3205)

Abstract

We present our approach to the design of two generations of outdoors device that enable visitors to view 3D historical reconstructions when exploring present day sites. Reacting to problems revealed through public trials with our first prototype, we describe how we followed a ’physical form inwards’ approach for the design of our second prototype – Augurscope II. We began by refining the physical form of the interface through a series of push tests with low-tech wooden prototypes and subsequently added sensors and finally refined the software. Our experience with the Augurscope II highlights the importance of prototyping, early involvement of users within the intended setting and the subtleties involved in matching physical form, sensors and software in the development of ubicomp devices.

Keywords

Augmented Reality Physical Form Iterative Design Physical Prototype Design Proposal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Avrahami, D., Hudson, S.: Forming interactivity: a tool for rapid prototyping of physical interactive products. In: Proc. Designing interactive systems (DIS 2002), pp. 141–146. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azuma, R.T.: The Challenge of Making Augmented Reality Work Outdoors. In: Ohta, Y., Tamura, H. (eds.) Mixed Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds, pp. 379–390. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benford, S., Bowers, J., Chandler, P., Ciolfi, L., Flintham, M., Fraser, M.: Unearthing Virtual History: Using Diverse Interfaces to Reveal Hidden Virtual Worlds. In: Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S. (eds.) UbiComp 2001. LNCS, vol. 2201, pp. 1–6. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, B., MacColl, I., Chalmers, M., Galani, A., Randell, C., Steed, A.: Lessons from the Lighthouse: Collaboration in a Shared Mixed Reality System. In: Proceedings CHI 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burrell, J., Gay, G., Kubo, K., Farina, N.: Context-Aware computing: A test case. In: Borriello, G., Holmquist, L.E. (eds.) UbiComp 2002. LNCS, vol. 2498, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheverst, K., Davies, N., Mitchell, K., Friday, A., Efstratiou, C.: Developing a Context-Aware Electronic Tourist Guide: Some Issues and Experiences. In: Proceedings CHI 2000, pp. 17–24. ACM Press, The Hague (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cook, J., Pettifer, S., Crabtree, A.: Developing the PlaceWorld environment. In: Mariani, J., Rodden, T. (eds.) eSCAPE De-liverable 4.1 The Cityscape Demonstrator, Lancaster Uni-versity (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fakespace, Verified December 10 (2003), http://www.fakespacelabs.com/products/boom3c.html
  9. 9.
    Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M.: Design at work. Laurence Erlbaum & Associates, Hillsdale (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McManus, P.M.: Good companions: More on the social determination of learning related behavior in a science museum. Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship, Elsevier 7(1), 37–44 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, London (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W.: User Centered System Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale (1986)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Piekarski, W., Thomas, B.: ARQuake: The Outdoors Augmented Reality System. Communications of the ACM 45(1), 36–38 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pletinckx, D., Callebaut, D., Killebrew, A.E., Silberman, N.A.: Virtual-Reality Heri-tage Presentation at Ename. IEEE Multimedia 7(2), 45–48 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rogoff, B.: Apprenticeship in thinking. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schnädelbach, H., Koleva, B., Flintham, M., Fraser, M., Izadi, S., Chandler, P., Foster, M., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T.: The Augurscope: A Mixed Reality Interface for Outdoors. In: Proceedings CHI 2002, Minneapolis, pp. 1–9. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Twidale, M., Randall, D., Bentley, R.: Situated Evaluation for Cooperative Systems. In: Proc. CSCW 1994, pp. 441–452. ACM Press, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J.: Exhibiting Interaction: Conduct and Collabo-ration in Museums and Galleries. Journal of Symbolic Interaction 24(2), 189–216 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Woodruff, A., Aoki, P.M., Hurst, A., Szymanski, M.H.: Electronic Guidebooks and Visitor Attention. In: Proc ICHIM 2001, Archives & Museum Informatics, pp. 437–454 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holger Schnädelbach
    • 1
  • Boriana Koleva
    • 1
  • Mike Twidale
    • 2
  • Steve Benford
    • 1
  1. 1.Mixed Reality LaboratoryUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Graduate School of Library and Information ScienceUniversity of IllinoisChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations