Combining Communication and Coordination Toward Articulation of Collaborative Activities

  • Alberto Barbosa Raposo
  • Marco Aurélio Gerosa
  • Hugo Fuks
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3198)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a proposal for the articulation of collaborative activities based on communication and coordination representation models. Articulation is essential in any kind of collaboration and involves pre- articulation of the tasks, their management, and post-articulation. For the representation of pre- and post-articulation phases, conversation clichés (communication) are used. For the coordination phase, a model separating the tasks and their interdependencies is used. The articulation schema, which is especially suited to e-business applications, is then applied to a business-web example.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, J.F.: Towards a General Theory of Action and Time. Artificial Intelligence 23, 123–154 (1984)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bond, A.H.: A Computational Model for Organizations of Cooperating Intelligent Agents. In: Proceedings of Conference on Office Information Systems, SIGOIS Bulletin, vol. 11(2- 3), pp. 21–30. ACM, New York (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carstensen, P.H., Nielsen, M.: Characterizing Modes of Coordination: A comparison between oral and artifact based coordination. In: Proceedings of GROUP, pp. 81–90. ACM, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen, R.P., Levesque, J.H.: Persistence, Intention and Commitment. In: Cohen, R.P., and Perrault, C.R. (eds.), Formal Theories of Communication, 171-203, Report n CSLI-87- 69 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deiters, W., Goesmann, T., Löffeler, T.: Flexibility in workflow management dimensions and solutions. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering 15(5), 303–313 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J., Rein, G.L.: Groupware - Some Issues and Experiences. Comm. of ACM 34(1), 38–58 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellis, C.A., Wainer, J.: A Conceptual Model of Groupware. In: Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 79–88. ACM Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fuks, H., Ryan, M., Sadler, M.: Outline of a Commitment Logic for Legal Reasoning. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Logics, Informatics and Law, vol. 2, pp. 391–405 (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuks, H.: Negotiation using Commitment and Dialogue. PhD. Thesis, Department of Computing, Imperial College, University of London (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fuks, H., Gerosa, M.A., Lucena, C.J.P.: The Development and Application of Distance Learning on the Internet. Open Learning - The Journal of Open and Distance Learning 17(1), 23–38 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koo, C., Wiederhold, G.: A commitment-based communication model for distributed office environments. In: Proceedings of Office Information Systems, SIGOIS Bulletin, vol. 9(2-3), pp. 291–298. ACM, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laufer, C.C., Fuks, H.: ACCORD: Conversation Clichés for Cooperation. In: Proceedings of COOP 1995 – First International Workshop on the Design of Cooperative Systems, pp. 351–369. INRIA Press (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? In: Proceedings of CSCW, pp. 357–370. ACM, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26(1), 87–119 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raposo, A.B., Fuks, H.: Defining Task Interdependencies and Coordination Mechanisms for Collaborative Systems. In: Blay- Fornarino, M., et al. (eds.) Cooperative Systems Design. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 74, pp. 88–103. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raposo, A.B., Magalhães, L.P., Ricarte, I.L.M.: Petri Nets Based Coordination Mechanisms for Multi-Workflow Environments. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering 15(5), 315–326 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schmidt, K., Tiger, R.A.: Or Computer Supported Cooperative Work. In: Proceedings of The 2nd European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1–16. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1991)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt, K., Bannon, L.J.: Taking CSCW seriously - Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1(2), 7–40 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schmidt, K., Simone, C.: Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 5(2-3), 155–200 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidt, K., Simone, C.: Mind the gap! Towards a unified view of CSCW. In: Proceedings of COOP 2000 - 4th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, pp. 205–221. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simone, C., Mark, G., Giubbilei, D.: Interoperability as a Means of Articulation Work. In: Proceedings of WACC: Int. Conf. on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, pp. 39–48. ACM, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suchman, L.A.: Do Categories Have Politics? Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2(3), 177–190 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tapscoot, D., Ticoll, D., Lowy, A.: Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs. Harvard Business School Press, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The Application of Petri Nets to Workflow Management. The Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers 8(1), 21–66 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers And Cognition. Addison-Wesley, USA (1987)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Winograd, T.: Categories, Disciplines, and Social Coordination. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2(3), 191–197 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Woo, C.C.: Sact - A Tool for Automating Semi-Structured Organizational Communication. In: Proc. of Conference on Office Information Systems, pp. 89–98. ACM, New York (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Barbosa Raposo
    • 1
  • Marco Aurélio Gerosa
    • 2
  • Hugo Fuks
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Graphics Group (Tecgraf), Computer Science DepartmentCatholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Software Engineering Laboratory (LES), Computer Science DepartmentCatholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)Rio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations