Investigating the Inclusivity of Digital Television Set-Top Boxes

  • Simeon Keates
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3196)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the accessibility of digital television (DTV) technology available in the UK, focusing on the current generation of set-top boxes (STBs) which provide ‘free to view’ services. Specifically, the objective of the study was to identify specific causes of concern with regard to user interaction with DTV that might lead to exclusion, i.e. situations where users may be unable to use the new technology. In particular interest was the identification of new challenges presented to users by DTV that are not found when using the current analogue equivalent. The number of STBs is increasing rapidly. Hence, for the purposes of this study, efforts were focused on looking at three set-top boxes (STB1, 2 and 3). STB1 was selected because it was being marketed as ‘easy to use’; STB2 because it was the market leader at the time; and STB3 was a satellite-based television service.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.F.: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DTI A study on the difficulties disabled people have when using everyday consumer products. Government Consumer Safety Research, Department of Trade and Industry, London, UK (2000) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    GAD National population projections: 2000-based. Office for National Statistics, London, UK (2001) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R.E., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1977)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grundy, E., Ahlburg, D., Ali, M., Breeze, E., Sloggett, A.: Disability in Great Britain. Department of Social Security, Corporate Document Services, London, UK (1999) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirsch, T., Forlizzi, J., Hyder, E., Goetz, J., Stroback, J., Kurtz, C.: The Elder project: social, emotional and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies. In: Proceedings of the 1st international Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 72–79. ACM Press, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J.: Countering Design Exclusion. Springer, London (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin, J., Meltzer, H., Elliot, D.: The prevalence of disability among adults, HMSO, London, UK (1988) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Popovic, V.: Product evaluation methods and their importance in designing interactive artefacts. In: Jordan, P., Green, W.S. (eds.) Human Factors in Product Design, Taylor and Francis, London, UK, pp. 26–35 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Semmence, J., Gault, S., Hussain, M., Hall, P., Stanborough, J., Pickering, E.: Family resources survey - Great Britain 1996-97. Department of Social Security, Corporate Document Services, London, UK (1998) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stanton, N., Young, M.: Is utility in the eye of the beholder – a study of ergonomic methods. Applied Ergonomics 29(1), 41–54 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simeon Keates
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM TJ Watson Research CenterHawthorneUSA

Personalised recommendations