Digital Divides Revisited: Towards a Model for Analysis

  • Annika Andersson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3183)


This paper presents a model for analyzing divides. The model is based on earlier research on the divide and includes: physical access, autonomy of use, know-how and motivation. Depending on the type of digital divide and the local situation, rectifying efforts must address the most crucial factor, which could be any of the four.


Digital Divide Information Literacy Physical Access Citizen Group Public Opinion Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Andersson, A.: Digital Divides – past, present and future (In Swedish: Digitala klyftor – förr, nu och i framtiden). Report for the Swedish Justice Ministry, Regeringskansliet, Elanders Gotab Stockholm (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buckler, G.: Digital divide creates haves and have nots. Computing Canada 27(24), 21 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E.: From the “Digital Divide” to “Digital Inequality”: StudyingGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Internet Use As Penetration Increases. Working Paper #15. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Doyle, C.: Information Literacy in an Information Society: A Concept for the Information Age, ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, Syracuse, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hargittai, E.: Beyond logs and surveys: In-depth measures of people’s Web use skills. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(14), 1239 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hargittai, E.: Second-Level Digital Divide: Mapping Differences in People’s Online Skills. First Monday, 7:4 (2002),
  8. 8.
    Hartviksen, G., Akselsen, S.: MICTS: Municipal ICT Schools – A Means for Bridging the Digital Divide Between Rural and Urban Communities. Education and Information Technologies 7(2), 93–109 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ICTC: Women’s use of the Internet (In Swedish: Om kvinnors användning av Internet). SOU 2002: 49 (2002),
  10. 10.
    ICTC: IT and the Elderly (in Swedish: IT och äldre). SOU 2002:15 (2002),
  11. 11.
    James, E.: Learning to bridge the digital divide. The OECD Observer 224, 43–45 (2001) ISSN: 00297054Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Katz, J., Aspden, P.: Motivations for and barriers to Internet usage: results of a national public opinion survey. Internet Research 7(3), 170–188 (1997) ISSN 1066-2243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazrui, A., Mazrui, A.: The digital revolution and the new reformation. Harvard International Review 23(1), 52–55 (2001) ISSN: 07391854Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration): A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. U.S. Department of Commerce (2002),
  15. 15.
    NTIA: Falling Through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion, A Report on Americans’ Access to Technology Tools, U.S. Department of Commerce (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    WWI (World Internet Institute): Swedes and the Internet (2002),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annika Andersson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics (ESI)Örebro UniversityÖrebroSweden

Personalised recommendations