What Can You Say with Only Three Pixels?

  • Christopher Campbell
  • Peter Tarasewich
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3160)

Abstract

The size limitations of mobile devices can make information display especially difficult. Micro-displays must take into account the viability of different sizes and configurations for informing users, the flexibility they provide for different types of messages, and under which conditions these results are achieved. An experiment was performed to measure user learning and comprehension of five sets of messages of increasing information size and complexity on a simulated three-light visual display. Results show that these “pixel-based” displays can transmit detailed, information-rich messages up to 6.75 bits in size with minimal training.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hansson, R., Ljungstrand, P., Redstöm, J.: Subtle and Public Notification Cues for Mobile Devices. In: Abowd, G.D., Brumitt, B., Shafer, S. (eds.) UbiComp 2001. LNCS, vol. 2201, p. 240. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris, L.R., Jenkin, M.: Vision and Attention. In: Jenkin, M., Harris, L.R. (eds.) Vision and Attention, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holland, S., Morse, D.R.: Audio GPS: Spatial Audio in a Minimal Attention Interface. In: Proc. Mobile HCI 2001 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holmquist, L.E., Falk, J., Wigström, J.: Supporting Group Collaboration with Inter- Personal Awareness Devices. Personal Technologies 3(1-2), 13–21 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson, P.: Usability and Mobility; Interactions on the Move. In: Proc. 1st Workshop on HCI for Mobile Devices, Univ. of Glasgow (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kahneman, D., Henik, A.: Perceptual Organization and Attention. In: Kubovy, M., Pomerantz, J.R. (eds.) Perceptual Organization, pp. 181–211. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1981)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mackinlay, J.: Automating the Design of Graphical Presentations of Relational Information. ACM Trans. on Graphics 5(2), 110–140 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maglio, P.P., Campbell, C.S.: Tradeoffs in Displaying Peripheral Information. In: Proc. CHI 2000, pp. 241–248. ACM Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCrickard, D.S., Chewar, C.M.: User Goals and Attention Costs. Comm. of the ACM 46(3), 67–72 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McCrickard, D.S., Catrambone, R., Chewar, C.M., Stasko, J.T.: Establishing Tradeoffs that Leverage Attention for Utility: Empirically Evaluating Information Display in Notification Systems. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 8, 547–582 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morin, R.E., Grant, D.A.: Learning and Performance of a Key-Pressing Task as a Function of the Degree of Spatial Stimulus-Response Correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology 49, 39–47 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, USA (1949)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tarasewich, P.: Designing Mobile Commerce Applications. Comm. of the ACM 46(12), 57–50 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tarasewich, P., Campbell, C., Xia, T., Dideles, M.: Evaluation of Visual Notification Cues for Ubiquitous Computing. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 349–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wisneski, C.A.: The Design of Personal Ambient Displays. M.Sc. Thesis, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA (May 1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Campbell
    • 1
  • Peter Tarasewich
    • 2
  1. 1.IBM Almaden Research CenterSan JoseUSA
  2. 2.College of Computer and Info. ScienceNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations