Constraint-Based Linear-Relations Analysis
Linear-relations analysis of transition systems discovers linear invariant relationships among the variables of the system. These relationships help establish important safety and liveness properties. Efficient techniques for the analysis of systems using polyhedra have been explored, leading to the development of successful tools like HyTech. However, existing techniques rely on the use of approximations such as widening and extrapolation in order to ensure termination. In an earlier paper, we demonstrated the use of Farkas Lemma to provide a translation from the linear-relations analysis problem into a system of constraints on the unknown coefficients of a candidate invariant. However, since the constraints in question are non-linear, a naive application of the method does not scale. In this paper, we show that by some efficient simplifications and approximations to the quantifier elimination procedure, not only does the method scale to higher dimensions, but also enjoys performance advantages for some larger examples.
KeywordsAbstract Interpretation Liveness Property Inductive Assertion Farkas Lemma Symbolic Transition System
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Collins, G.: Quantifier elimination for real closed fields by cylindrical algebraic decomposition. In: Brakhage, H. (ed.) GI-Fachtagung 1975. LNCS, vol. 33, pp. 134–183. Springer, Heidelberg (1975)Google Scholar
- 7.Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract Interpretation: A unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: ACM Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 238–252 (1977)Google Scholar
- 8.Cousot, P., Halbwachs, N.: Automatic discovery of linear restraints among the variables of a program. In: ACM Principles of Programming, January 1978, pp. 84–97 (1978)Google Scholar
- 9.Fukuda, K., Prodon, A.: Double description method revisited. In Combinatorics and Computer Science. In: Deza, M., Manoussakis, I., Euler, R. (eds.) CCS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1120, pp. 91–111. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Google Scholar
- 12.Henzinger, T.A., Ho, P.: HyTech: The Cornell hybrid technology tool. In: Antsaklis, P.J., Kohn, W., Nerode, A., Sastry, S.S. (eds.) HS 1994. LNCS, vol. 999, pp. 265–293. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
- 13.Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Temporal Verification of Reactive Systems: Safety. Springer, New York (1995)Google Scholar
- 14.Sankaranarayanan, S., Sipma, H.B., Manna, Z.: Petri net analysis using invariant generation. In: Dershowitz, N. (ed.) Verification: Theory and Practice. LNCS, vol. 2772, pp. 682–701. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar