Advertisement

Everything Gets Better All the Time, Apart from the Amount of Data

  • Hieu T. Nguyen
  • Arnold Smeulders
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3115)

Abstract

The paper first addresses the main issues in current content-based image retrieval to conclude that the largest factors of innovations are found in the large size of the datasets, the ability to segment an image softly, the interactive specification of the user’s wish, the sharpness and invariant capabilities of features, and the machine learning of concepts. Among these everything gets better every year apart from the need for annotation which gets worse with every increase in the dataset size. Therefore, we direct our attention to the question what fraction of images needs to be labeled to get an almost similar result compared to the case when all images would have been labeled by annotation? And, how can we design an interactive annotation scheme where we put up for annotation those images which are most informative in the definition of the concept (boundaries)? It appears that we have developed an random followed by a sequential annotation scheme which requires annotating 1% equal to 25 items in a dataset of 2500 faces and non-faces to yield an almost identical boundary of the face-concept compared to the situation where all images would have been labeled. This approach for this dataset has reduced the effort of annotation by 99%.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Campbell, C., Cristianini, N., Smola, A.: Query learning with large margin classifiers. In: Proc. 17th International Conf. on Machine Learning, pp. 111–118. Morgan Kaufmann, CA (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohn, D.A., Ghahramani, Z., Jordan, M.I.: Active learning with statistical models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence research 4, 129–145 (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geusebroek, J.M., van den Boomgaard, R., Smeulders, A.W.M., Geerts, H.: Color invariance. IEEE Trans. on PAMI 23(12), 1338–1350 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gevers, T., Smeulders, A.W.M.: Pictoseek: Combining color and shape invariant features for image retrieval. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 9(1), 102 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J.: Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. JohnWiley & Sons, West Sussex (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewis, D.D., Gale, W.A.: A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. In: Croft, W.B., van Rijsbergen, C.J. (eds.) Proceedings of SIGIR 1994, 17th ACM International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 3–12. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lowe, D.G.: Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 1150–1157 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mundy, J.L., Zisserman, A.: Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Papageorgiou, C., Poggio, T.: A trainable system for object detection. Int. J. Computer Vision 38(1), 15–33 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pham, T.V., Worring, M., Smeulders, A.W.M.: Face detection by aggregated Bayesian network classifiers. Pattern Recogn. Letters 23(4), 451–461 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmid, C., Mohr, R., Bauckhage, C.: Evaluation of interest point detectors. Int. J. Computer Vision 37(2), 151–172 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smeulders, A.W.M., Worring, M., Santini, S., Gupta, A., Jain, R.C.: Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Trans. on PAMI 22(12), 1349–1380 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sung, K.K., Poggio, T.: Example-based learning for view-based human face detection. IEEE Trans. on PAMI 20(1), 39–51 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tong, S., Chang, E.: Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM int. conf. on Multimedia, pp. 107–118 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tong, S., Koller, D.: Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2, 45–66 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tuytelaars, T., Turina, A., Van Gool, L.J.: Noncombinatorial detection of regular repetitions under perspective skew. IEEE Trans. on PAMI 25(4), 418–432 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vapnik, V.N.: Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, Chichester (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Viola, P., Jones, M.J.: Robust real-time face detection. Int. J. Computer Vision 57(2), 137–154 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Worring, M., Smeulders, A.W.M., Santini, S.: Interaction in content-based retrieval: an evaluation of the state-of-the-art. In: Laurini, R. (ed.) VISUAL 2000. LNCS, vol. 1929, pp. 26–36. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, T., Oles, F.J.: Text categorization based on regularized linear classification methods. Information Retrieval 4(1), 5–31 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu, J., Hastie, T.: Kernel logistic regression and the import vector machine. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hieu T. Nguyen
    • 1
  • Arnold Smeulders
    • 1
  1. 1.Intelligent Sensory Information SystemsUniversity of Amsterdam, Faculty of ScienceAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations