Advertisement

Shock Waves pp 1223-1228 | Cite as

Numerical simulations of forward detonation drivers for high-enthalpy shock tunnel

  • C. L. Liu
  • Z. M. Hu
  • D. L. Zhang
  • Z. Jiang
Conference paper

Abstract

In this paper, detonation propagation in a forward detonation driver is simulated by solving axis-symmetric Euler equations to examine its performances. The Dispersion Controlled Dissipation (DCD) scheme is adopted in the simulations and the two-step chemical reaction model modified by M. Sichel et al. are accepted for a H2O2 mixture. The flowfield near the cavity ring is treated as a two-dimensional case and other sections are one-dimensional. The propagation, reflection and focusing of the detonation are captured in detail and numerical results show the ratio of the cavity radius to that of the detonation tube plays an important role in wave interaction. It is observable that a strong up-stream travelling shock wave is generated from detonation wave reflections and shock wave focusing, which can elevate the flow pressure that has decreased because of Taylor expansions waves. In the driven section, the contact interface almost staying near the end of the driven section after the shock wave reflection affects long-drawn usable test gas flow more or less.

Keywords

Shock Wave Detonation Wave Shock Tube Cavity Ring Shock Wave Propagation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hu Zongmin, Zhang Deliang, Liu Changli, Jiang Zonglin: Numerical simulation of gaseous detonation wave with a detailed chemical reaction model. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology 23 (Supplement), 110 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jiang Zonglin, K. Takayama, Y.S. Chen: Dispersion conditions for non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes and its applications. Comp. Fluid Dynamics Journal 2(4), 137 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang Zonglin et al.: Forward-running detonation drivers for high-enthalpy shock tunnels. AIAA Journal 40(10), 2009 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.A. Jones et al.: Numerical simulation of detonation reignition in H 2O 2 mixtures in area expansions. Shock Waves 10, 33 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B.J. Mcbride, M.J. Zehe, and Sanford Gordon: NASA Glenn coefficients for calculating thermodynamic properties of individual species. NASA/TP-2002-211556 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Sichel et al.: A two-step kinetics model for numerical simulation of explosions and detonations in H 2O 2 mixtures. Proc. R. Soc. London A 458(2017), 49 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.L. Steger, R.F. Warming, Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gas dynamic equations with applications to finite difference method. J. Computational Physics 40, 263 (1981)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. L. Liu
    • 1
  • Z. M. Hu
    • 1
  • D. L. Zhang
    • 1
  • Z. Jiang
    • 1
  1. 1.LHD, Institute of MechanicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations