Formulating a General Standards Life Cycle

  • Eva Söderström
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3084)

Abstract

Standards-related literature within business-to-business (B2B) covers many separate areas. Examples are enabling technology, development processes for standards in formal, semi-formal and informal fora, base standards (XML and EDI) extensions and evolvement, intellectual property rights, etc, etc. In computer science literature, the term life cycle is usually used to denote the previously mentioned phases for a product or process, from ”birth to death”. They are useful for understanding various phenomena and how these relate to their respective environments such as to stakeholders. However, the standards life cycles is only rarely discussed in literature. This paper examines seven existing life cycle models for standards and standardisation, and shows where extensions to the current approaches are needed. The result is a general standards life cycle model, which may serve as the basis for discussion and to identify perspectives for both standards research and standards practice to consider.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ISO-IEC, ISO-IEC Guide 2:1996(E/F/R), ISO/IEC, Switzerland(1996) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Söderström, E., Petterson, A.: Adoption of B2B standards. In: Jardim-Goncalves, et al. (eds.) Concurrent Engineering: Enhanced Interoperable Systems, pp. 343–350. A.A.Balkema Publishers, Lisse (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Webster’s, Webster’s Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, Gramercy Books, Random House Value Publishing, Inc. (1996) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    OROD (2003), Open Resources On-Line Dictionary Open Resources on the web, as is: 2003-10-28, http://www.openresources.com/cgi-bin/dict
  5. 5.
    Cargill, C.: A Five-Segment Model for Standardization. In: Kahin, Abbate (eds.) Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure, pp. 79–99. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burrows, J.: Information Technology standards in a changing world: the role of the users. In: Computer Standards & Interfaces, pp. 323–331. Elsevier Science, B.V (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Köller, J., Jarke, M., Schoop, M.: Towards a standardization process for component- based architectures. In: Jardim-Goncalves, et al. (eds.) Concurrent Engineering: The Vision for the Future Generation in Research and Applications, Balkema Publishers, Lisse, Portugal, pp. 359–367 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ollner, J.: The Company and Standardization, 3rd edn. Swedish Standards Institution, Stockholm (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Vries, H.: Standardisation education, ERIM report series: Research in Management, Ref no.ERS-2002-82-ORG, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weiss, M., Spring, M.: Selected Intellectual Property Issues in Standardization. In: Jakobs, K. (ed.) Information Technology Standards and Standardization: A Global Perspective, pp. 63–79. IDEA Group Publishing, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Egyedi, T.: Institutional Dilemma in ICT Standardization: Coordinating the diffusion of technology? In: Jakobs, K. (ed.) Information Technology Standards and Standardization: A Global Perspective, pp. 48–62. IDEA Group Publishing, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hanseth, O., Braa, K.: Hunting for the treasure at the end of the rainbow: standardising corporate IT infrastructure. In: Ngwenyama, et al. (eds.) New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work, vol. 9, Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baskin, E., Krechmer, K., Sherif, M.: The six dimensions of standards: Contribution towards a theory of standardization. In: Lefebvre (ed.) Management of Technology, Sustainable Development and Eco-Efficiency, Elsevier Press, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sherif, M.: When is Standardization slow? International Journal of IT Standards & Standardization Research 1(1), 19–32 (2003a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ishikawa, Y.: Concurrent Engineering: Part 1: Business requirements, life cycle activity, key agenda for success and challenge with ISO standards. In: Cha, et al. (eds.) Concurrent Engineering: The Vision for the Future Generation in Research and Applications, pp. 523–532. Balkema Publishers, Lisse (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sherif, M.: Technology Substitution and Standardization in Telecommunication Services. In: Egyedi, et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, the Netherlands, October 22-24, pp. 241–252. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003b) Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISO, How conformity assessment works, available at as is (June 2, 2003) http://www.iso.org/iso/en/comms-markets/conformity/iso+conformity-02.html
  18. 18.
    ECIF, 2002 Survey of Demands for E-Business Standardization in Korea. Integrated Forum on Electronic Commerce (ECIF) (December 30, 2002) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fasolino, A., Natale, D., Poli, A., Quaranta, A.: Metrics in the development and maintenance of software: an application in a large scale environment. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice 12, 343–355 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Söderström
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Humanities and InformaticsUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden

Personalised recommendations