ISMS 2004: Medical Simulation pp 49-58 | Cite as

A Finite Element Study of the Influence of the Osteotomy Surface on the Backward Displacement during Exophthalmia Reduction

  • Vincent Luboz
  • Annaig Pedrono
  • Dominique Ambard
  • Franck Boutault
  • Pascal Swider
  • Yohan Payan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3078)

Abstract

Exophthalmia is characterized by a protrusion of the eyeball. The most frequent surgery consists in an osteotomy of the orbit walls to increase the orbital volume and to retrieve a normal eye position. Only a few clinical observations have estimated the relationship between the eyeball backward displacement and the decompressed fat tissue volume. This paper presents a method to determine the relationship between the eyeball backward displacement and the osteotomy surface made by the surgeon, in order to improve exophthalmia reduction planning. A poroelastic finite element model involving morphology, material properties of orbital components, and surgical gesture is proposed to perform this study on 12 patients. As a result, the osteotomy surface seems to have a non-linear influence on the backward displacement. Moreover, the FE model permits to give a first estimation of an average law linking those two parameters. This law may be helpful in a surgical planning framework.

Keywords

Patient Mesh Ocular Muscle Finite Element Study Orbital Volume Orbital Decompression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Saraux, H., Biais, B., Rossazza, C.: Ophtalmologie. Pathologie de l’orbite, ch. 22, pp. 341–353, Masson (ed.) (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stanley, R.J., McCaffrey, T.V., Offord, K.P., DeSanto, L.W.: Superior and transantral orbital decompression procedures. Effects on increased intraorbital pressure and orbital dynamics. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 115, 369–373 (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson, W.B., Manke, W.F.: Orbital decompression in Graves’ disease. The predictability of reduction of proptosis. Arch. Ophthalmol. 109, 343–345 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adenis, J.P., Robert, P.Y.: Décompression orbitaire selon la technique d’Olivari. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 17(1), 686–691 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller, J.M., Demer, J.L.: Clinical applications of computer models for strabismus. In: Rosenbaum, Santiago, A.P. (eds.) Clinical Strabismus Management, Pub. W. B. Saunders (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchberger, M., Mayr, H.: SEE-Kid: software engineering environment for knowledge-based interactive eye motility diagnostics. In: Proceedings of the Int. Symposium on Telemedicine, Gothenburg, Sweden (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, Z., Chui, C.K., Cai, Y., Amrith, S., Goh, P.S., Anderson, J.H., Theo, J., Liu, C., Kusuma, I., Nowinski, W.L.: Modeling of the human orbit from MR Images. In: Dohi, T., Kikinis, R. (eds.) MICCAI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2489, pp. 339–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luboz, V., Pedrono, A., Amblard, D., Swider, P., Payan, Y., Boutault, F.: Prediction of tissue decompression in orbital surgery. Clinical Biomechanics 19/2, 202–208 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biot, M.A.: General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics 12, 155–164 (1941)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fung, Y.C.: Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Power, E.D., Stitzel, J.D., West, R.L., Herring, I.P., Duma, S.M.: A non linear finite element model of the human eye for large deformation loading. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of Biomechanics, San Diego, pp. 44–45 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mow, V.C., Kuei, S.C., Lai, W.M., Armstrong, C.G.: Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: theory and experiments. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 102, 73–84 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simon, B.R., Wu, J.S.S., Carlton, M.W., Evans, J.H., Kazarian, L.E.: Structural models for human spinal motion segments based on a poroelastic view of the intervertebral disk. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 107, 327–335 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riemann, C.D., Foster, J.A., Kosmorsky, G.S.: Direct orbital manometry in patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy, vol. 106, pp. 1296–1302 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Couteau, B., Payan, Y., Lavallée, S.: The mesh-matching algorithm: an automatic 3D mesh generator for finite element structures. Journal of Biomechanics 33, 1005–1009 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent Luboz
    • 1
  • Annaig Pedrono
    • 2
  • Dominique Ambard
    • 2
  • Franck Boutault
    • 3
  • Pascal Swider
    • 2
  • Yohan Payan
    • 1
  1. 1.TIMC-GMCAO Laboratory, UMR CNRS 5525Faculté de Médecine Domaine de la MerciLa TroncheFrance
  2. 2.Biomechanics Laboratory, IFR30Purpan University HospitalToulouseFrance
  3. 3.Maxillofacial DepartmentPurpan University HospitalToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations