Towards Reuse in Agent Oriented Information Systems: The Importance of Being Purposive
The emergence of large information systems has pushed software specification into the area of business modelling to adequately capture and consider business requirements. At the same time, there has been a move toward techniques for specifying the behaviours of and the knowledge associated with intelligent agents as these are increasingly found as important components of those information systems. This paper presents four software models useful for specifying the requirements of an agent oriented information system. Adopting a similar notation for each model smooths the transition between models. It will be shown that it is in the relationships between these models there is scope for capturing purposive descriptions that facilitate reuse at various levels. A commentary on the importance of an explicit representation of the purpose for which a software component is intended is provided followed by an example, from the domain of military simulation, that illustrates the model and its application. The aim of this paper is to present a modelling approach that unifies business models, use case models, agent behavioural models and domain models, for the purpose of specifying an agent oriented information system.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Heinze, C., Cross, M., Goss, S., Josefsson, T., Lloyd, I., Murray, G., Papasimeon, M., Turner, M.: Agents of change: The impact of intelligent agent technology on the analysis of air operations. In: Jain, L., Ichalkaranje, N., Tonfoni, G. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Systems for Defence, 1st edn., December 2002. Series on Innovative Intelligence, vol. 2, ch.6, pp. 229–264. World Scientific, River Edge (2002)Google Scholar
- 4.Heinze, C., Goss, S., Josefsson, T., Bennett, K., Waugh, S., Lloyd, I., Murray, G., Oldfield, J.: Interchanging agents and humans in military simulation. AI Magazine 23(2), 37–47 (2002); An earlier version of this paper appeared in the Innovative Applications of AI conference, Seattle (2001)Google Scholar
- 5.Heinze, C., Papasimeon, M., Goss, S.: Specifying agent behaviour with use cases. In: Proceedings of Pacific Rim Workshop on Multi-Agents, PRIMA, pp. 128–142 (2000)Google Scholar
- 6.Heinze, C., Sterling, L.: Knowledge representation. In: AAMAS Poster Paper 2002, Bologna, Italy (2002)Google Scholar
- 7.Kruchten, P.: The rational unified process, an introduction (2000)Google Scholar
- 9.Papasimeon, M., Heinze, C.: Extending the UML for designing jack agents. In: Proceedings of the Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC 2001), Canberra, Australia (2001) (to appear)Google Scholar
- 10.Penker, M., Eriksson, H.: Business Modelling with UML: Business Patterns at Work. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2000)Google Scholar
- 11.Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: BDI-agents: from theory to practice. In: Proceedings of the First Intl. Conference on Multiagent Systems, San Francisco (1995)Google Scholar
- 12.Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A., Goodstein, L.: Cognitive Systems Engineering. Wiley Interscience, Hoboken (1994)Google Scholar
- 13.Rosenberg, D., Scott, K.: Use Case Driven Object Modeling with UML. Addison Wesley, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
- 14.Wegmann, A., Genilloud, G.: The roles of “roles” in use case diagrams. In: Evans, A., Kent, S., Selic, B. (eds.) UML 2000. LNCS, vol. 1939, pp. 210–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar