Advertisement

Grounding Robot Sensory and Symbolic Information Using the Semantic Web

  • Christopher Stanton
  • Mary-Anne Williams
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3020)

Abstract

Robots interacting with other agents in dynamic environments require robust knowledge management capabilities if they are to communicate, learn and exhibit intelligent behaviour. Symbol grounding involves creating, and maintaining, the linkages between internal symbols used for decision making with the real world phenomena to which those symbols refer. We implement grounding using ontologies designed for the Semantic Web. We use SONY AIBO robots and the robot soccer domain to illustrate our approach. Ontologies can provide an important bridge between the perceptual level and the symbolic level and in so doing they can be used to ground sensory information. A major advantage of using ontologies to ground sensory and symbolic information is that they enhance interoperability, knowledge sharing, knowledge reuse and communication between agents. Once objects are grounded in ontologies, Semantic Web technologies can be used to access, build, derive, and manage robot knowledge.

References

  1. 1.
    Cagenolsi, A., Greco, A., Harnard, S.: Symbol grounding and the symbolic theft hypothesis. In: Cangelosi, A., Parisi, D. (eds.) Simulating the Evolution of Language. Springer, London (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chalup, S., Creek, N., Freeston, L., Lovell, N., Marshall, J., Middleton, R., Murch, C., Quinlan, M., Shanks, G., Stanton, C., Williams, M.-A.: When NUbots Attack! The, NUbots Team Report, Newcastle Robotics Laboratory Report (2002), http://robots.newcastle.edu.au/NUbotFinalReport.pdf
  3. 3.
    Coradeschi, S., Saffioti, A.: Anchoring symbols to sensor data: preliminary report. In: Proc. of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2001), pp. 129–135 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gärdenfors, P., Williams, M.-A.: Building Rich and Grounded Robot World Models from Sensors and Knowledge Resources: A Conceptual Spaces Approach. In: The Proceedings of the International Symposium on Autonomous Mini-robots for Research and Edutainment, pp. 123–133 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2) (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guarino, N.: Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43(5–6), 625–640 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harnard, S.: The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42, 335–346 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McCarthy, J., Hayes, P.J.: Some Philosophical Problems from the Standpoint of Artificial Intelligence. In: Michie, D. (ed.) Machine Intelligence 4. American Elsevier, New York (1969)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Uschold, M., Grüninger, M.: Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11(2) (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Stanton
    • 1
  • Mary-Anne Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Innovation and Technology Research Laboratory, Faculty of Information TechnologyUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations