A Logic-Based Infrastructure for Reconfiguring Applications

  • Marco Castaldi
  • Stefania Costantini
  • Stefano Gentile
  • Arianna Tocchio
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2990)


This paper proposes the DALI Multiagent System, which is a logic programming environment for developing agent-based applications, as a tool for component-based software management based on coordination. In particular, we show the usefulness of the integration between DALI and the agent-based Lira system, which is a Light-weight Infrastructure for Reconfiguring Applications. We argue that using intelligent agents for managing component-based software systems makes it possible to: (i) perform monitoring and supervision upon complex properties of a system, such as for instance performance; (ii) perform global reconfigurations dynamically, through the cooperation of intelligent agents.


Multiagent System External Event Past Event Intelligent Agent Internal Event 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Costantini, S.: Towards active logic programming. In: Brogi, A., Hill, P. (eds.) Proc. of 2nd International Workshop on component-based Software Development in Computational Logic (COCL 1999), PLI 1999, Paris, France (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Costantini, S., Tocchio, A.: A logic programming language for multi-agent systems. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Leone, N., Ianni, G. (eds.) JELIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2424, p. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costantini, S., Tocchio, A.: Context-based commmonsense reasoning in the dali logic programmming language. In: Blackburn, P., Ghidini, C., Turner, R.M., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) CONTEXT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2680, pp. 443–450. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castaldi, M., Carzaniga, A., Inverardi, P., Wolf, A.L.: A light-weight infrastructure for reconfiguring applications. In: Proceedings of 11th Software Configuration Management Workshop, Portland, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Porcarelli, S., Castaldi, M., Di Giandomenico, F., Inverardi, P., Bondavalli, A.: An approach to manage reconfiguration in fault-tolerant distributed systems. In: Proceedings of ICSE Workshop on Software Architectures for Dependable Systems, Portland, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castaldi, M., Ryan, N.D.: Supporting component-based development by enriching the traditional api. In: Proceedings of 4th European GCSE Young Researchers Workshop 2002, in conjunction with NoDE, Erfurt, Germany (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castaldi, M., Angelis, G.D., Inverardi, P.: A reconfiguration language for remote analysis and application adaptation. In: Proceedings of ICSE Workshop on Remote Analysis and Measurement of Software Systems, Portland, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oreizy, P., Gorlick, M., Taylor, R., Heimbigner, D., Johnson, G., Medvidovic, N., Quilici, A., Rosenblum, D., Wolf, A.: An architecture-based approach to selfadaptive software. IEEE Intelligent Systems 13, 54–62 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wermelinger, M.: Towards a chemical model for software architecture reconfiguration. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garlan, D., Schmerl, B., Chang, J.: Using gauges for architecture-based monitoring and adaptation. In: Proc. of Working Conference on Complex and Dynamic Systems Architecture, Brisbane, Australia (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shrivastava, S.K., Wheater, S.M.: Architectural support for dynamic reconfiguration of large scale distributed applications. Technical Report 645, Department of Computing Science, University of Newcastle upon Tyne (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bidan, C., Issarny, V., Saridakis, T., Zarras, A.: A dynamic reconfiguration service for corba. In: Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, Annapolis, Maryland, USA, pp. 35–42 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Batista, T., Rodriguez, N.: Dynamic reconfiguration of component-based applications. In: Proceedings of Internation Symposium on Software Engineering for Parallel and Distributed Systems (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    de La Rocque Rodriguez, N., Ierusalimschy, R.: Dynamic reconfiguration of CORBA-based applications. In: Proceedings of Conference on Current Trends in Theory and Practice of Informatics (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Almeida, J.P.A., Wegman, M., Pires, L.F., van Sinderen, M.: An approach to dynamic reconfiguration of distributed systems based on object-middleware. In: Proceedings of 19th Brasilian Symposium on Computer Networks (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The common object request broker: Architecture and specification. Omg official specification, Object Management Group (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Endler, M.: A language for implementing generic dynamic reconfigurations of distributed programs. In: Proceedings of 12th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Networks (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wermelinger, M., Lopes, A., Fiadeiro, J.: A graph based architectural (re)configuration language. In: Proc. of ESEC/FSE 2001, ACM Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jonker, C.M., Lam, R.A., Treur, J.: A reusable multi-agent architecture for active intelligent websites. Journal of Applied Intelligence 15, 7–24 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    SISCtus home page:
  21. 21.
    Kowalski, R.A., Sergot, M.J.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Generation Computing 4, 67–95 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rose, M.T.: The Simple Book: An Introduction to Networking Management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bellissard, L., de Palma, N., Riveill, M.: Dynamic reconfiguration of agent-based applications. In: Proceedings of European Research Seminar on Advances in Distributed Systems (1999)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wermelinger, M.: A hierarchical architecture model for dynamic reconfiguration. In: Proc. of the 2nd Intl. Workshop on Software Engineering for Parallel and Distributed Systems, pp. 243–254. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castaldi, M.: Lira: a practitioner approach. Technical report, University of L’Aquila (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: Jade a fipa-compliant agent framework. In: Proceedings of PAAM 1999, London, UK, pp. 97–108 (1999), Project URL:
  27. 27.
    Son, C.T., Pontelli, E., Ranjan, D., Milligan, B., Gupta, G.: An agent-based domain specific framework for rapid prototyping of applications in evolutionary biology. In: Leite, J., Omicini, A., Sterling, L., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2990, pp. 76–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Denti, E., Omicini, A., Ricci, A.: tuprolog: A light-weight prolog for internet applications and infrastructures. In: Ramakrishnan, I.V. (ed.) PADL 2001. LNCS, vol. 1990, p. 184. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Castaldi
    • 1
  • Stefania Costantini
    • 1
  • Stefano Gentile
    • 1
  • Arianna Tocchio
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversità degli Studi di L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations