GECCO 2004: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation – GECCO 2004 pp 923-934 | Cite as
Distribution of Evolutionary Algorithms in Heterogeneous Networks
Abstract
While evolutionary algorithms (EAs) have many advantages, they have to evaluate a relatively large number of candidate solutions before producing good results, which directly translates into a substantial demand for computing power. This disadvantage is somewhat compensated by the ease of parallelizing EAs. While only few people have access to a dedicated parallel computer, recently, it also became possible to distribute an algorithm over any bunch of networked computers, using a paradigm called “grid computing”. However, unlike dedicated parallel computers with a number of identical processors, the computers forming a grid are usually quite heterogeneous. In this paper, we look at the effect of this heterogeneity, and show that standard parallel variants of evolutionary algorithms are significantly less efficient when run on a heterogeneous rather than on a homogeneous set of computers. Based on that observation, we propose and compare a number of new migration schemes specifically for heterogeneous computer clusters. The best found migration schemes for heterogeneous computer clusters are shown to be at least competitive with the usual migration scheme on homogeneous clusters. Furthermore, one of the proposed migration schemes also significantly improves performance on homogeneous clusters.
Keywords
Evolutionary Algorithm Heterogeneous Networks Parallelization Island Model Grid ComputingPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.Alba, E., Nebro, A., Troya, J.: Heterogeneous computing and parallel genetic algorithms. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 1362–1385 (2002)Google Scholar
- 5.Alba, E., Tomassini, M.: Parallelism and evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(5), 443–461 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Arenas, M., Collet, P., Eiben, A., Jelasity, M., Merelo, J., Paechter, B., Preuß, M., Schoenauer, M.: A framework for distributed evolutionary algorithms. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pp. 665–675. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
- 7.Buyya, R., Branson, K., Gidy, J., Abramson, D.: The virtual laboratory: a toolset to enable distributed molecular modelling for drug design on the world-wide grid. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 15, 1–25 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cantu-Paz, E.: Efficient and Accurate Parallel Genetic Algorithms. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.Chong, F.S.: Java based distributed genetic programming on the internet. Technical report, School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK (1999)Google Scholar
- 10.Foster, I., Kesselman, C. (eds.): The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)Google Scholar
- 11.Liu, P., Lau, F., Lewisand, J., Wang, C.: Asynchronous parallel evolutionary algorithm for function optimization. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pp. 405–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
- 12.Munetomo, M., Takai, Y., Sato, Y.: An efficient migration scheme for subpopulation-based asynchronously parallel genetic algorithms. In: Forrest, S. (ed.) International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, p. 649. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)Google Scholar
- 13.Schmeck, H., Kohlmorgen, U., Branke, J.: Parallel implementations of evolutionary algorithms. In: Zomaya, A., Ercal, F., Olariu, S. (eds.) Solutions to Parallel and Distributed Computing Problems, pp. 47–66. Wiley, Chichester (2001)Google Scholar