Advertisement

The Best Systems for Appointing Referees

  • Jaime Gil Lafuente
Chapter

Abstract

For many years, presidents and general managers of major football (soccer) clubs in Spain have been debating over how to assign referees for each match. When the responsible committee subjectively selected a referee, many people responsible for the “affected” teams had the right to complain about the always latent possibility that a certain amount of favoritism could occur for certain matches. While now, by using the famous “machine”1, the whims of randomness mean that certain matches that are considered important are not refereed by the most suitable referees.

Keywords

Fuzzy Subset Fuzzy Relation Technical Level Responsible Committee Technical Speed 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Luca, A. and Termini, S.: “A definition nonprobabilistic entropy in the set-ting fuzzy sets theory” . Information and Control, 1972, 20, p.301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gil Aluja, J.: “Elements for a theory of decision in uncertainty”. Kluwer Aca-demic Publishers. Dortrech, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gil Aluja, J.: “La Gestión Interactiva de los Recursos Humanos en la Incer-tidumbre” , CEURA, Madrid 1996, p. 170–172.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gil Aluja, J.: “Selección de Personal. El problema de la polivalencia y el de la uniformida” . Note-books, CEURA. Madrid, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gil Aluja, J.: “The interactive management of human resources in uncertainty”. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dortrech, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gil Aluja, J.: Elements for a theory of decision in uncertainty. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dortrech, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gil Lafuente, J.: “Algoritmos de la Excelencia. Claves para el Exit° en la Gestión Deportiva”. Publ.. Milladoiro, Publications of the Barcelona F.C., Vigo, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gil Lafuente, J.: “El Mejor Sistema de Designación Arbitral: el Algoritmo Húngaro”. Actas del Congreso: “International Congress A.C.S.E.G.’2002”. Boulogne-Sur-Mer (France), 21and 22 , November, 2002, p. 167–180.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gil Lafuente, J.: “La asignacióón de deportistas a los puestos de un equipo” . Proceedings of the: “VI S.I.G.E.F” Congress. Morelia, Michoacán (Mexico), 15, 16 and 17, November de 1999, D. 284–299.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gil Lafuente, J.: “Les Universitats en el Centenari del Futbol Club Barcelona. Estudis en l’àmbit de l’esport”, (J. Gil Aluja Ed.): “L’optimització del fitxatge d’un esportista en l’ambit de l’esport” . Publications of the Barcelona F.C.. Publ. Milladoiro, Santiago de Compostela, 1999, p. 3–55.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gil Lafuente, J.: “The adquisition of having inmobilized inmaterial in the sports societies”. Proceedings: “International MS’99 Congress”. Santiago de Compostela, 17, 18 and 19. May 1999, p. 185–196.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gil Lafuente, J.: “Una Herramienta Optima de Designación Arbitral basada en las Lógicas Multivalentes: Hombre y Máquina”. Proceedings: “XI International Congress A.E.D.E.M.” . Paris (France), 2, 3 and 4, September 2002, p. 491–498.Google Scholar
  13. 13..
    Gil Lafuente, J: “El ‘Indice del Máximo y Mínimo Nivel’ en la Opti-mización del Fichaje de un Deportista”. Proceedings: “X International Congress A.E.D.E.M.”. Reggio Calabria (Italia), 4, 5 and 6.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gil Lafuente, J: “Marketing para el nuevo Milenio. Nuevas tecnicas para la gestión comercial en la incertidumbre” . Publ Pirámide. Madrid, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaufmann, A. and Gil Aluja, J.: “Introducción a la teoría de los subconjuntos borrosos a la gestión de las empresas”. Publ. Milladoiro (3rd edition). Santiago de Compostela, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaufmann, A. and Gil Aluja, J.: “Tecnicas especiales para la gestión de exper-tos” . Publ. Milladoiro. Santiago de Compostela, 1993.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    König, D.: “Theorie der endlichen und unendlichen graphen (1916), later reprinted by Chelsea Publ. CO, New York, 1950. This work was made known by Kuhn, H.W. in his article “The Hungarian Method for the Assignment Prob-lem” , Naval Research Quaterly, vol. 2, no 1–2 March-June 1955.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zadeh, L.: “Fuzzy Sets. Information and control”. 8 July 1965, p. 338–353.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimmermann, H. J.: “Results of empirical studies in fuzzy sets theory”. In Klir, G. J.: “Applied General Systems Research. Plenum. New York, 1978, p.303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaime Gil Lafuente
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitat de BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations