Advertisement

Towards a UML Profile for Software Product Lines

  • Tewfik Ziadi
  • Loïc Hélouët
  • Jean-Marc Jézéquel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3014)

Abstract

This paper proposes a UML profile for software product lines. This profile includes stereotypes, tagged values, and structural constraints and it makes possible to define PL models with variabilities. Product derivation consists in generating product models from PL models. The derivation should preserve and ensure a set of constraints which are specified using the OCL.

Keywords

Product Line Class Diagram Variation Point Sequence Diagram Software Product Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atkinson, C., Bayer, J., Bunse, C., Kamsties, E., Laitenberger, O., Laqua, R., Muthig, D., Paech, B., Wüst, J., Zettel, J.: Component-based Product Line Engineering with UML. Component Software Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clements, P., Bass, L., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practices. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clauß, M.: Modeling variability with uml. In: GCSE 2001 Young Researchers Workshop (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duenas, J.C., El Kaim, W., Gacek, C.: Style, structure and views for handling commonalities and varibilities - esaps deliverable (wg 2.2.3). Technical report, ESAPS Project (2001) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Object Management Group. Uinified modeling language specification version 2.0: Superstructure. Technical Report pct/03-08-02, OMG (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ho, W.-M., Jézéquel, J.-M., Guennec, A.L., Pennaneac’h, F.: UMLAUT: an extendible UML transformation framework. In: Proc. Automated Software Engineering, ASE 1999, Florida (October 1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ITU-T. Z.120 : Message sequence charts (MSC) (November 1999) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muthig, D., Atkinson, C.: Model-driven product line architectures. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, p. 110. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pree, W., Fontoura, M., Rumpe, B.: Product line annotations with uml-f. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) SPLC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2379, p. 188. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Warmer, J., Kleppe, A.: The Object Constraint Language-Precise Modeling with UML. Object Technology Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ziadi, T., Hélouët, L., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Modeling behaviors in Product Lines. In: Proceedings of Requirement Engineering for Product Lines Workshop (REPL 2002), September 2002, pp. 33–38 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ziadi, T., Jézéquel, J.-M., Fondement, F.: Product line derivation with uml. In: van Gurp, J., Bosh, J. (eds.) Proceedings Software Variability Management Workshop. University of Groningen Departement of Mathematics and Computing Science, pp. 94–102 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tewfik Ziadi
    • 1
  • Loïc Hélouët
    • 1
  • Jean-Marc Jézéquel
    • 2
  1. 1.IRISA-INRIARennes CedexFrance
  2. 2.IRISA-Rennes1 UniversityRennes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations