Advertisement

Hardware Countermeasures against DPA – A Statistical Analysis of Their Effectiveness

  • Stefan Mangard
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2964)

Abstract

Many hardware countermeasures against differential power analysis (DPA) attacks have been developed during the last years. Designers of cryptographic devices using such countermeasures to protect their devices have the challenging task to select and implement a suitable combination of countermeasures. Every device has different requirements, and so there is no universal solution to protect devices against DPA attacks.

In this article, a statistical approach is pursued to determine the effect of hardware countermeasures on the number of samples needed in DPA attacks. This approach results in a calculation method that enables designers to assess the resistance of their devices against DPA attacks throughout the design process. This way, different combinations of countermeasures can be easily compared and costly design iterations can be avoided.

Keywords

Smart cards Side-Channel Attacks Differential Power analysis (DPA) Hardware countermeasures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, D., Archambeault, B., Rao, J.R., Rohatgi, P.: The EM Side-channel(s). In: Kaliski Jr., B.S., Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2523, pp. 29–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benini, L., Macii, A., Macii, E., Omerbegovic, E., Poncino, M., Pro, F.: Energy- Aware Design Techniques for Differential Power Analysis Protection. In: 40th Design Automation Conference – DAC 2003, ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clavier, C., Coron, J.-S., Dabbous, N.: Differential Power Analysis in the presence of Hardware Countermeasures. In: Paar, C., Koç, Ç.K. (eds.) CHES 2000. LNCS, vol. 1965, pp. 252–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coron, J.-S.: Resistance against Differential Power Analysis for Elliptic Curve Cryptosystems. In: Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 1999. LNCS, vol. 1717, pp. 292–302. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golic, J.D., Tymen, C.: Multiplicative Masking and Power Analysis of AES. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S., Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2523, pp. 198–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goubin, L.: A Sound Method for Switching between Boolean and Arithmetic Masking. In: Koç, Ç.K., Naccache, D., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2001. LNCS, vol. 2162, pp. 3–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goubin, L., Patarin, J.: DES and Differential Power Analysis – The Duplication Method. In: Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 1999. LNCS, vol. 1717, pp. 158–172. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Irwin, J., Page, D., Smart, N.P.: Instruction Stream Mutation for Non- Deterministic Processors. In: IEEE International Conference on Application- Specific Systems, Architectures, and Processors – ASAP 2002, pp. 286–295. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kocher, P.C.: Timing Attacks on Implementations of Diffie-Hellman, RSA, DSS and Related Attacks. In: Koblitz, N. (ed.) CRYPTO 1996. LNCS, vol. 1109, pp. 104–113. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kocher, P.C., Jaffe, J., Jun, B.: Differential Power Analysis. In: Wiener, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1999. LNCS, vol. 1666, pp. 388–397. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mangard, S.: A Simple Power-Analysis (SPA) Attack on Implementations of the AES Key Expansion. In: Lee, P.J., Lim, C.H. (eds.) ICISC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2587, pp. 343–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    May, D., Muller, H.L., Smart, N.P.: Non-deterministic Processors. In: Varadharajan, V., Mu, Y. (eds.) ACISP 2001. LNCS, vol. 2119, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Messerges, T.S.: Using Second-Order Power Analysis to Attack DPA Resistant Software. In: Paar, C., Koç, Ç.K. (eds.) CHES 2000. LNCS, vol. 1965, pp. 238–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Messerges, T.S., Dabbish, E.A., Sloan, R.H.: Power Analysis Attacks of Modular Exponentiation in Smartcards. In: Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 1999. LNCS, vol. 1717, pp. 144–157. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Messerges, T.S., Dabbish, E.A., Sloan, R.H.: Examining Smart-Card Security under the Threat of Power Analysis Attacks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 51(5) (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moore, S., Anderson, R., Cunningham, P., Mullins, R., Taylor, G.: Improving Smart Card Security using Self-timed Circuits. In: Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Asynchronous Circuits and Systems – Async 2002, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moore, S., Anderson, R., Mullins, R., Taylor, G.: Balanced Self- Checking Asynchronous Logic for Smart Card Applications. In: Microprocessors and Microsystems Journal (to appear)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oswald, E.: Enhancing Simple Power-Analysis Attacks on Elliptic Curve Cryptosystems. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S., Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2523, pp. 82–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saputra, H., Vijaykrishnan, N., Kandemir, M., Irwin, M.J., Brooks, R., Kim, S., Zhang, W.: Masking the Energy Behavior of DES Encryption. In: Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition – DATE 2003, pp. 84–89. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tiri, K., Akmal, M., Verbauwhede, I.: A Dynamic and Differential CMOS Logic with Signal Independent Power Consumption to Withstand Differential Power Analysis on Smart Cards. In: 29th European Solid-State Circuits Conference – ESSCIRC 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tiri, K., Verbauwhede, I.: Securing Encryption Algorithms against DPA at the Logic Level: Next Generation Smart Card Technology. In: Walter, C.D., Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2003. LNCS, vol. 2779, pp. 125–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trichina, E., De Seta, D., Germani, L.: Simplified Adaptive Multiplicative Masking for AES and its Secure Implementation. In: Kaliski Jr., B.S., Koç, Ç.K., Paar, C. (eds.) CHES 2002. LNCS, vol. 2523, pp. 187–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Mangard
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Applied Information Processing and CommunicationsGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations