Structural Risk Minimization on Decision Trees Using an Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

  • DaeEun Kim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 3003)

Abstract

Inducing decision trees is a popular method in machine learning. The information gain computed for each attribute and its threshold helps finding a small number of rules for data classification. However, there has been little research on how many rules are appropriate for a given set of data. In this paper, an evolutionary multi-objective optimization approach with genetic programming will be applied to the data classification problem in order to find the minimum error rate for each size of decision trees. Following structural risk minimization suggested by Vapnik, we can determine a desirable number of rules with the best generalization performance. A hierarchy of decision trees for classification performance can be provided and it is compared with C4.5 application.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blake, C., Keogh, E., Merz, C.J.: UCI repository of machine learning databases. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Machine Learning (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bot, M.C.J.: Improving induction of linear classification trees with genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2000), pp. 403–410. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bot, M.C.J., Langdon, W.B.: Application of genetic programming to induction of linear classification trees. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Genetic Programming (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breiman, L.: Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24(2), 123–140 (1996)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., Stone, C.: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth International Group (1984)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fayyad, U.M.: On the induction of decision trees for multiple concept learning. Ph. D. dissertation, EECS department, University of Michigan (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J.: Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 416–423. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freitas, A.A., Pappa, G.L., Kaestner, C.A.A.: Attribute selection with a multiobjective genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 16th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 280–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Irani, K.B., Khaminsani, V.A.: Knowledge based automation of semiconductor manufacturing. In SRC Project Annual Review Report, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Jong, E.D., Pollack, J.B.: Multi-objective methods for tree size control. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines 4(3), 211–233 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, D., Hallam, J.: An evolutionary approach to quantify internal states needed for the woods problem. In: From Animals to Animats 7, pp. 312–322. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mingers, J.: An empirical comparison of selection measures for decision-tree induction. Machine Learning 4(2), 227–243 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitchell, T.M.: Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Quinlan, J.R.: Improved use of continuous attributes in C4.5. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Approach 4, 77–90 (1996)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Quinlan, J.R., Rivest, R.: Inferring decision trees using the minimum description length principle. Information and Computation 80(3), 227–248 (1996)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vapnik, V.N.: The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zitzler, E.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications. Ph. D. dissertation, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • DaeEun Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Cognitive Robotics Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations