Automatic Tuning of Fuzzy Partitions in Inductive Reasoning
The aim of this research is to automatically tuning a good fuzzy partition, i.e. determine the number of classes of each system variable, in the context of the Fuzzy Inductive Reasoning (FIR) methodology. FIR is an inductive methodology for modelling and simulate those systems from which no previous structural knowledge is available. The first step of FIR methodology is the fuzzification process that converts quantitative variables into fuzzy qualitative variables. In this process it is necessary to define the number of classes into which each variable is going to be discretized. In this paper an algorithm based on simulated annealing is developed to suggest a good partition in an automatic way. The proposed algorithm is applied to an environmental system.
KeywordsCost Function Ozone Concentration Candidate Solution Simulated Annealing Algorithm Fuzzy Partition
- 2.Mugica, F., Cellier, F.: Automated synthesis of a fuzzy controller for cargo ship steering by means of qualitative simulation. In: Proc. ESM 1994, European Simulation MultiConference, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 523–528 (1994)Google Scholar
- 4.Nebot, A.: Qualitative Modeling and Simulation of Biomedical Systems Using Fuzzy Inductive Reasoning. Ph.d. thesis, Dept. Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (1994)Google Scholar
- 6.Nebot, A., Mugica, F., Gómez, P.: Long term prediction of maximum ozone concentration using fuzzy inductive reasoning. In: Proceedings EUNITE 2001: European Symposium on Intelligent Technologies, Hybrid Systems and their implementation on Smart Adaptive Systems, Tenerife, Spain, December 13-15, pp. 91–101 (2001)Google Scholar
- 8.Wieland, D., Wotawa, W.: Local maximum ozone concentration prediction using neural networks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop On Environmental Decision Support Systems and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 47–54 (1999)Google Scholar
- 9.Wotawa, F., Wotawa, G.: From neural networks to qualitative knowledge in ozone forecasting. AI Communications 14, 23–33 (1993)Google Scholar