Advertisement

Using Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules for Intelligent Tutoring System’s Knowledge Acquisition

  • Yang Sok Kim
  • Sung Sik Park
  • Byeong Ho Kang
  • Joa Sang Lim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 2903)

Abstract

This research focuses on the knowledge acquisition (KA) for an intelligent tutoring system (ITS). ITSs have been developed to provide considerable flexibility in presentation of learning materials and greater abilities to respond to individual students’ needs. Our system aims to support experts who want to accumulate the classification knowledge. Rule based reasoning has been widely used in ITSs. Knowledge acquisition bottleneck is a major problem in ITSs as it is known in AI area. This problem hinders the diffusion of ITSs. MCRDR is a well known knowledge acquisition methodology and mainly used in classification domain. MCRDR is used to acquire knowledge for the classification of learning materials (objects). The new ITS is used to develop a part of online education system for the people who learn English as a second language. Our experiment results show that the classification of learning materials can be more flexible and can be organized in multiple contexts.

Keywords

Knowledge Acquisition Multiple Classification Intelligent Tutoring System Classification Time Classification Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ainsworth, S., Grimshaw, S., Underwood, J.: Teachers Implementing Pedagogy through REDEEM. Computer and Education 33, 171–187 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck, J., Stern, M., Haugsjaa, E.: Applications of AI in EducationGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchanan, B., Shortliffe, E. (eds.): Rule based Expert System: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project (1984)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke, R.: Conceptual Indexing and Active Retrieval of Video for Interactive Learning Environments. Knowledge-Based Systems 9, 491–499 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Compton, P.J., Jansen, R.: A Philosophical Basis for Knowledge Acquisition. In: 3rd European Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Paris, p. 75–89 (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Compton, P.: Insight and Knowledge in AAAI Spring Symposium: Cognitive aspects of knowledge acquisition, Stanford University, pp. 57–63 (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Compton, P., Edwards, G., Kang, B., Lazarus, L., Malor, R., Menzies, T., Preston, P., Srinivasan, A., Sammut, C.: Ripple Down Rules: Possibilities and Limitations. In: 6th Bannf AAAI Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop, Banff (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Compton, P., Kang, B., Preston, P., Mulholland, M.: Knowledge Acquisition without Analysis. Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems. In: Aussenac, N., Boy, G.A., Ganascia, J.-G., Kodratoff, Y., Linster, M., Gaines, B.R. (eds.) EKAW 1993. LNCS, vol. 723, pp. 278–299. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Compton, P., Richard, D.: Extending Ripple Down Rules. In: The 4th Australian Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, University of NSW, Sydney, pp. 87–101 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang, B., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules: Evaluation and Possibilities. In: Proceedings of the 9th AAAI-Sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Banff, Canada, University of Calgary (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evens, M.W., Brandle, S., Chang, R., Freedman, R., Glass, M., Lee, Y.H., Shim, L.S., Woo, C.W., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Michael, J.A., Rovick, A.A.: CIRCSIM-Tutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System using Natural Language Dialogue. In: 12th Midwest AI and Cognitive Science Conference, Oxford OH, pp. 16–23 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frasson, C., Aimeur, E.: Designing a Multi-Strategic Intelligent Tutoring System for Training in Industry. Computers in Industry 37, 153–167 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayes-Roth, F., Waterman, D.A., Lenat, D.B. (eds.): Building Expert Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1983)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heffernan, N.T., Koedinger, K.R.: An Intelligent Tutoring System Incorporating a Model of an Experienced Human TutorGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, Y.C., Evens, M.W., Michael, J.A., Trace, D.: Physiology Tutorials Using Casual Concept Mapping. In: 13th Midwest AI and Cognitive Science Conference, Chicago IL, pp. 61–64 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kolodner, J.L., Jona, M.Y.: Case-Based Reasoning: An Overview in Technical Report #15 (1991)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Larkin, J., Chabay, R., Sheftic, C. (eds.): Computer-assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Establishing Communication and Collaboration, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1990)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nussbaum, M., Rosas, R., Peirano, I., Cardenas, F.: Development of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Using Knowledge Structures. Computer and Education 36, 15–32 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Polson, M.C., Richardson, J.J. (eds.): Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 21–53. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Popper, K.: Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1963)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schank, R.C.: Case-Based Teaching: Four Experiences in Educational Software Design. Interactive Learning Environments 1(4), 231–253 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schulze, K.G., Shelby, R.N., Treacy, D.J., Wintersgill, M.C.: Andes: A Coached Learning Environment for Classical Newtonian Physics. In: 11th International Conference on College Teaching and LearningGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Slade, S.: Cased-Based Reasoning: A Research Paradigm. AI Magazine 12(1), 42 (1991)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sokolnicki, T.: Towards Knowledge-Based Tutors: a Survey and Appraisal of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 6(2), 59–95 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhou, Y., Freedman, R., Glass, M.: Delivering Hints in a Dialog-Based Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Proceedings of 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1999), Orlando (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Woolf, B.: Theoretical Frontiers in Building a Machine Tutor. In: Kearsley, G. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence and Instruction-Applications and methods, Addison-Wesley, Reading (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Sok Kim
    • 1
  • Sung Sik Park
    • 1
  • Byeong Ho Kang
    • 1
  • Joa Sang Lim
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ComputingUniversity of TasmaniaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Media TechnologyUniversity of SangmyungKorea

Personalised recommendations