Advertisement

‘Security’ Architectures, New Ontologies and the Category of Gender. Contemporary Challenges in Feminist Technoscience Studies

  • Jutta Weber

Abstract

When Afghanistan refugees pass the mountainous border to Pakistan they get their irises scanned by UN officials. Asylum seekers in Europe mutilate the tips of their fingers for not being identified via the Eurodac, a database of the fingerprints of all asylum seekers of the EU. More and more European countries introduce passports with RFID chips containing biometric data of their citizens. It seems that the body becomes the primary source for the technological verification of identities in the 21st century and the border becomes “part of the embodied identity of certain groups of people, verifiable at any of the many points of access to increasingly interconnected databases“ (Van der Ploeg 2005: 133). These are only some examples of manifolded discourses and practices within the context of new ‘security architectures’ with its social sorting, policing, militarization and re-masculinization of society. These systems get increasingly enlarged – legitimized with security issues during the ongoing western ‘wars on terror’. Astonishingly, there is only little discussion on new ‘security’ resp. surveillance technologies with their practices been deeply inscribed into our everyday life. In my opinion these issues are main challenges of feminist and other critical technoscience studies today.

Keywords

Asylum Seeker Feminist Theory Feminist Critique Security Architecture Woman Scientist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, Kirstie: Organization, Surveillance and the Body: Towards a Politics of Resistance. In: Organization, Vol. 12(1). 2005. 89–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, David/Kennedy, Barbara M. (eds.) (2000): The Cybercultures Reader. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackmore, Tim (2005): War X. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bowker, Geoffrey C./Star, Susan Leigh (1999): Sorting Things Out. Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Capurro, Rafael/Nagenborg, Michael/Tamburinni, Giugelmo (eds.): Ethics and Robotics. Heidelberg: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft (in print)Google Scholar
  6. Corea, Gene (1985): Man-Made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies Affect Women. London: HutchinsonGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, Kathy/Evans, Mary/Lorber, Judith (eds.) (2006): Handbook of Gender and Women’s Studies. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  8. Easlea, Brian (1983): Fathering the unthinkable: masculinity, scientists and the nuclear arms race/Brian Easlea Publication London: PlutoGoogle Scholar
  9. Fausto-Sterling, Anne (1985): Myths of Gender. Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: BasicGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel (2003): Society Must Be Defended. Lectures at the College de France, 1975–1976. Picador USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Franklin, Sarah (1993): ‘Life Itself’. Paper delivered at the Center for Cultural Values, Lancaster University, June 9.Google Scholar
  12. Franko Aas, Katja: ‘The Body Does Not Lie’. Identity, risk and trust in technoculture. In: Crime Media Culture, 2 (2). 2006: 143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haraway, Donna J. (1997): Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleMan©_Meets_ Onco-Mouse™. Feminism and Technoscience. New York/London: Routledge
  14. Hayles, N. Katherine (1999): How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago/London: Chicago University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Jasanoff, Sheila/Markle, Gerald E./Petersen, James C./Pinch, Trevor (eds.) (1995): Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks u.a.: SageGoogle Scholar
  16. Kay, Lily E. (1996) Life as Technology: Representing, Intervening, and Molecularizing. In: Sahotra Sarkar (1996): 87–100Google Scholar
  17. Keller, Evelyn Fox (1985): Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven/London: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Keller, Evelyn Fox (1995): The Origin, History, and Politics of the Subject called ‘Gender and Science’. In: Jasanoff, Sheila et al. (1995): 80–94Google Scholar
  19. Langfeldt, O. (2009): Barrot: Polizeizugriff auf Eurodac geplant. In: http://www.datenschutz.de/news/detail/?nid=3735 (last access: Aug. 13th, 09)
  20. Latour, Bruno (1987): Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Masters, Cristina: Bodies of Technology. Cyborg Soldiers and Militarized Masculinities. In: International Feminist Journal of Politics. 7:1 March 2005. 112–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Price, Derek J. de Solla (1963): Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (2007): Historische Epistemologie zur Einführung. Hamburg: JuniusGoogle Scholar
  24. Rose, Nicholas (2001): The Politics of Life Itself. In: Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 18. No. 6. 2001. 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sahotra Sarkar (ed.) (1996): The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives. Dordrecht/Boston/London: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone, Sandy (1993) The ‘Empire’ Strikes Back: A Posttranssexual Manifesto. In: http://www.actlab.utexas.edu/%7Esandy/empire-strikes-back, pp. 1–30 (last access: 7/2000)
  27. Stryker, Susan (2000): Transsexuality: the postmodern body and/as technology'. In: Bell, David/Kennedy, Barbara M. (eds.) (2000): 588–597Google Scholar
  28. Trauth, Eileen M. (ed.) (2006): Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology. 2 vols. Hershey, PA: The Idea GroupGoogle Scholar
  29. UN News Centre (2007): Iris Scan Technology Registers 150,000 Returning Afghans. At: http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocus/afghanistan/infocusnews.asp?NewsID=608&s ID=1# (last access August, 11th 2009)
  30. Van der Ploeg, Irma (2005): The Machine-Readable Body. Maastrich: ShakerGoogle Scholar
  31. Wajcman, Judith (1991): Feminism Confronts Technology. University Park: Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Weber, Jutta (2006): From Science and Technology to Feminist Technoscience’. In: Davis, Kathy/Evans, Mary/Lorber, Judith (eds.) (2006): 397–414 or: http://www.unibielefeld.de/ZIF/FG/2006Application/PDF/Weber_essay.pdf
  33. Weber, Jutta (2009): Robotic Warfare, Human Rights & the Rhetorics of Ethical Machines. In: Capurro, Rafael/Nagenborg, Michael (2009): Ethics and Robotics. Amsterdam: IOS Press(in print)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jutta Weber

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations