Advertisement

Jugendkriminalität in sozialen Kontexten

Zur Rolle von Wohngebieten und Schulen bei der Verstärkung von abweichendem Verhalten Jugendlicher
  • Dietrich OberwittlerEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Dass Einflüsse der Lebensumwelten einen positiven oder negativen Beitrag zur Entwicklung von Kindern und Jugendlichen leisten und auch an der Entstehung von Delinquenz beteiligt sein können, ist keine überraschende Erkenntnis, auch wenn sie in den Forschungsansätzen zu Jugenddelinquenz lange Zeit keine angemessene Aufmerksamkeit gefunden hat. Effekte sozialräumlicher Kontexte auf Individuen zu untersuchen ist aufwändig und fügt der ohnehin schwierigen Theoriebildung und empirischen Analyse eine weitere Komplexitätsstufe hinzu.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Akers, R. L., & Jensen, G. F. (Hrsg.). (2003). Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: a guide for the new century. New Brunswick, N. J.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York.Google Scholar
  3. Arum, R. (2000). Schools and communities: ecological and institutional dimensions. Annual Review of Sociology 26, 395 – 418.Google Scholar
  4. Autor, D., Figlio, D., Karbownik, K., Roth, J., & Wasserman, M. (2015). Family disadvantage and the gender gap in behavioral and educational outcomes (Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Working Paper 15-16).Google Scholar
  5. Baerveldt, C., Völker, B., & Van Rossem, R. (2008). Revisiting selection and influence: an inquiry into the friendship networks of high school students and their association with delinquency. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 50(5), 559 – 587.Google Scholar
  6. Baier, D., & Rabold, S. (2009). Jugendgewalt in segregierten Stadtteilen. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Kommunalwissenschaften (2), 35 – 49.Google Scholar
  7. Baumer, E. P., & Arnio, A. N. (2012). Multi-level Modeling and Criminological Inquiry. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt & S. Messner (Hrsg.), The Sage Handbook of Criminological Research Methods (S. 97 – 111). Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  8. Beier, H. (2014). Peer effects in offending behaviour across contexts: Disentangling selection, opportunity and learning processes. European Journal of Criminology 11(1), 73 – 90.Google Scholar
  9. Bellair, P. E., & McNulty, T. L. (2005). Beyond the bell curve: community disadvantage and the explanation of black-white differences in adolscent violence. Criminology 43(4), 1135 – 1167.Google Scholar
  10. Bernasco, W., Rruiter, S., Bruinsma, G., Pauwels, L., & Weerman, F. (2013). Situational causes of offending: a fixed-effects analysis of space-time budget data. Criminology 51(4), 895 – 926.Google Scholar
  11. Bernburg, J. G., & Thorlindsson, T. (2007). Community structure and adolescent delinquency in Iceland: A contextual analysis. Criminology 45 (2), 415 – 444.Google Scholar
  12. Beyers, J. M., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Neighborhood structure, parenting processes, and the development of youths externalizing behaviors: a multilevel analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology 31(1/2), 35 – 53.Google Scholar
  13. Bingenheimer, J. B., Brennan, R. T., & Earls, F. J. (2005). Firearm violence exposure and serious violent behavior. Science 308, 1323 – 1326.Google Scholar
  14. Bottoms, A. E. (2012). Developing socio-spatial criminology. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan & R. Reiner (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 5. Auflage (S. 450 – 488). Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Boudon, R. (1998). Social mechanisms without black boxes. In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Hrsg.), Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (S. 172 – 203). Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Brännström, L. (2006). Phantom of the neighbourhood. longitudinal studies on area-based conditions and individual outcomes. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  17. Brännström, L. (2008). Making their mark: the effects of neighbourhood and upper secondary school on educational achievement. European Sociological Review 24(4), 463 – 478.Google Scholar
  18. Brännström, L., & Rojas, Y. (2012). Rethinking the Long-Term Consequences of Growing Up in a Disadvantaged Neighbourhood: Lessons from Sweden. Housing Studies 27(6), 729 – 747.Google Scholar
  19. Brookmeyer, K. A., Fanti, K. A., & Henrich, C. C. (2006). Schools, parents, and youth violence: a multilevel, ecological analysis. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 35(4), 504 – 514.Google Scholar
  20. Browning, C. R., Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2005). Sexual initiation in early adolescence: the nexus of parental and community control. American Sociological Review 70, 758 – 778.Google Scholar
  21. Burdick-Will, J., & Ludwig, J. (2013). Neighborhood Effects on Crime. Evidence from America’s Moving to Opportunity Experiment. In D. Oberwittler, S. Rabold & D. Baier (Hrsg.), Städtische Armutsquartiere – Kriminelle Lebenswelten? (S. 97 – 116). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  22. Bursik, R. J. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: problems and prospects. Criminology 26(4), 519 – 552.Google Scholar
  23. Carlson, P., & B. Almquist, Y. (2016). Are area-level effects just a proxy for school-level effects? Socioeconomic differences in alcohol consumption patterns among Swedish adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 166, 243 – 248.Google Scholar
  24. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, 95 – 120.Google Scholar
  25. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  26. Conger, R. D., Ge, X., Elder, G. H., Lorenz, F. O., & Simons, R. L. (1994). Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Development 65, 541 – 561.Google Scholar
  27. Crane, J. (1991). The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. American Journal of Sociology 96, 1226 – 1259.Google Scholar
  28. Crowder, K., & South, S. J. (2003). Neighborhood distress and school dropout: the variable significance of community context. Social Science Research 32(4), 659 – 698.Google Scholar
  29. De Coster, S., Heimer, K., & Wittrock, S. M. (2006). Neighborhood disadvantage, social capital, street context, and youth crime. Sociological Quarterly 47(4), 723.Google Scholar
  30. Deinet, U. (Hrsg.). (2005). Sozialräumliche Jugendarbeit. Grundlagen, Methoden und Praxiskonzepte. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  31. Dishion, T. J., & Tipsord, J. M. (2011). Peer Contagion in Child and Adolescent Social and Emotional Development. Annual Review of Psychology 62(1), 189 – 214.Google Scholar
  32. Duncan, G. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Assessing the effect of context in studies of child and youth development. Educational Psychologist 34(1), 29 – 41.Google Scholar
  33. Duncan, G. J., & Murnane, R. (Hrsg.). (2011). Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances. New York.Google Scholar
  34. Elliott, D. S., Menard, S., Rankin, B. H., Wilson, W. J., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Good kids from bad neighborhoods. Successful development in social context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  35. Engel, U., & Simonson, J. (2005). Sozialer Kontext in der Mehrebenenanalyse. In A. Diekmann (Hrsg.), Methoden der Sozialforschung (S. 303 – 329). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  36. Esser, H. (2002). Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. 6 Bde. Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
  37. Fagan, A. A., & Wright, E. M. (2012). The effects of neighborhood context on youth violence and delinquency. does gender matter? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 10(1), 64 – 82.Google Scholar
  38. Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (2007). Saving children from a life of crime. early risk factors and effective interventions. Oxford.Google Scholar
  39. Farwick, A. (2012). Segregation. In F. Eckardt (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stadtsoziologie (S. 381 – 419). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  40. Frehsee, D. (1979). Strukturbedingungen urbaner Kriminalität: Eine Kriminalgeographie der Stadt Kiel unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Jugendkriminalität. Göttingen.Google Scholar
  41. Friedrichs, J. (1997). Normenpluralität und abweichendes Verhalten: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse. In W. Heitmeyer (Hrsg.), Was treibt die Gesellschaft auseinander? (S. 473 – 505). Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar
  42. Friedrichs, J., Galster, G., & Musterd, S. (2003). Neighbourhood effects on social opportunities: The European and American research and policy context. Housing Studies 18(6), 797 – 806.Google Scholar
  43. Friedrichs, J., & Oberwittler, D. (2007). Soziales Kapital in Wohngebieten. In A. Franzen & M. Freitag (Hrsg.), Sozialkapital (S. 450 – 486). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  44. Furstenberg, F. F. J., Cook, T. D., Eccels, J., Elder, G. H. J., & Smeroff, A. (1999). Managing to make it. urban families and adolescent success. Chicago.Google Scholar
  45. Galster, G. (2012). The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: theory, evidence, and policy implications. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson & D. Maclennan (Hrsg.), Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives (S. 23 – 56). Dordrecht u. a.Google Scholar
  46. Gerstner, D., & Oberwittler, D. (2015). Wer kennt wen und was geht ab? Ein netzwerkanalytischer Blick auf die Rolle delinquenter Peers im Rahmen der ‚Situational Action Theory‘. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform 2015(3), 204 – 226.Google Scholar
  47. Grogger, J. (1998). Market wages and youth crime. Journal of Labour Economics 16(4), 756 – 791.Google Scholar
  48. Häußermann, H. (2008). Wohnen und Quartier: Ursachen sozialräumlicher Segregation. In E.-U. Huster, J. Boekh & H. Mogge-Grotjahn (Hrsg.), Handbuch Armut und Soziale Ausgrenzung (S. 335 – 349). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  49. Harding, D. J. (2007). Cultural context, sexual behavior, and romantic relationships in disadvantaged neighborhoods. American Sociological Review 72, 341 – 364.Google Scholar
  50. Hay, C., Fortson, E. N., Hollist, D. R., Altheimer, I., & Schaible, L. M. (2007). Compounded risk: the implications for delinquency of coming from a poor family that lives in a poor community. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 36, 593 – 605.Google Scholar
  51. Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces 84(2), 1109 – 1130.Google Scholar
  52. Haynie, D. L., Silver, E., & Teasdale, B. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics, peer networks, and adolescent violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 22, 147 – 169.Google Scholar
  53. Haynie, D. L., Doogan, N. J., & Soller, B. (2014). Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: a dynamic network approach. Criminology 52(4), 688 – 722.Google Scholar
  54. Haynie, D. L., & Kreager, D. A. (2013). Peer networks and crime. In F. T. Cullen & P. Wilcox (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of criminological theory (S. 257 – 273). New York und Oxford.Google Scholar
  55. Hess, H., & Scheerer, S. (2004). Theorie der Kriminalität. In D. Oberwittler, & S. Karstedt (Hrsg.), Soziologie der Kriminalität (S. 69 – 92). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  56. Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications, 2. Auflage. New York.Google Scholar
  57. Hummelsheim, D., Oberwittler, D., & Pritsch, J. (2015). Die Beziehung zwischen Kriminalitätsfurcht und generalisiertem Vertrauen – Mehrebenenanalysen zur Rolle individueller und kontextueller Faktoren. In S. Eifler & D. Pollich (Hrsg.), Empirische Forschung über Kriminalität. Methodologische und methodische Grundlagen (S. 405 – 438). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  58. Hurrelmann, K. (2006). Einführung in die Sozialisationstheorie, 9. Auflage. Weinheim.Google Scholar
  59. Kauppinen, T. M. (2008). Schools as mediators of neighbourhood effects on choice between vocational and academic tracks of secondary education in helsinki. European Sociological Review 24, 379 – 391.Google Scholar
  60. Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2007). Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects. Econometrica 75(1), 83 – 119.Google Scholar
  61. Klocke, A., & Hurrelmann, K. (Hrsg.). (1998). Kinder und Jugendliche in Armut. Opladen und Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  62. Knecht, A., Snijders, T., Baerveldt, C., Steglich, C. E., & Raub, W. (2010). Friendship and Delinquency: Selection and Influence Processes in Early Adolescence. Social Development 19(3), 494 – 514.Google Scholar
  63. Kreager, D. A. (2007). When it’s good to be „bad“: violence and adolescent peer acceptance. Criminology 45(4), 893 – 923.Google Scholar
  64. Lahey, B. B., Van Hulle, C. A., Onofrio, B. M., Lee Rodgers, J., & Waldman, I. D. (2008). Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency?. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 36, 807 – 823.Google Scholar
  65. Leckie, G. (2009). The complexity of school and neighbourhood effects and movements of pupils on school differences in models of educational achievement. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 172(3), 537 – 554.Google Scholar
  66. Ludwig, J., Liebman, J. B., Kling, J. R., Duncan, G. J., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2008). What Can We Learn about Neighborhood Effects from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment?. American Journal of Sociology 114(1), 144 – 188.Google Scholar
  67. Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., & Kunter, M. (2009). Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34, 120 – 131.Google Scholar
  68. Maimon, D., & Browning, C. R. (2010). Unstructured socializing, collective efficacy, and violent behavior among urban youth. Criminology 48(2), 443 – 474.Google Scholar
  69. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge/Mass.Google Scholar
  70. Molnar, B. E., Roberts, A. L., Browne, A., Gardener, H., & Buka, S. L. (2005). What girls need: recommendations for preventing violence among urban girls in the US. Social Science and Medicine 60, 2191 – 2204.Google Scholar
  71. Murie, A., & Musterd, S. (2004). Social exclusion and opportunity structures in european cities and neighbourhoods. Urban Studies 41(8), 1441 – 1459.Google Scholar
  72. Nieuwenhuis, J., & Hooimeijer, P. (2016). The association between neighbourhoods and educational achievement, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 31(2), 321 – 347.Google Scholar
  73. Oberwittler, D. (2003). Geschlecht, Ethnizität und sozialräumliche Benachteiligung – überraschende Interaktionen bei sozialen Bedingungsfaktoren von Gewalt und schwerer Eigentumsdelinquenz von Jugendlichen. In S. Lamnek & M. Boatca (Hrsg.), Geschlecht – Gewalt – Gesellschaft (S. 269 – 294). Opladen.Google Scholar
  74. Oberwittler, D. (2004a). A multilevel analysis of neighbourhood contextual effects on serious juvenile offending. The role of subcultural values and social disorganization. European Journal of Criminology 1(2), 201 – 235.Google Scholar
  75. Oberwittler, D. (2004b). Stadtstruktur, Freundeskreise und Delinquenz. Eine Mehrebenenanalyse zu sozialökologischen Kontexteffekten auf schwere Jugenddelinquenz. In D. Oberwittler & S. Karstedt (Hrsg.), Soziologie der Kriminalität (S. 135 – 170). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  76. Oberwittler, D. (2007a). The effects of ethnic and social segregation on children and adolescents: recent research and results from a German multilevel study (Discussion Paper Nr SP IV 2007 – 603, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung). Berlin.Google Scholar
  77. Oberwittler, D. (2007b). The effects of neighbourhood poverty on adolescent problem behaviours: a multi-level analysis differentiated by gender and ethnicity. Housing Studies 22(5), 781 – 803.Google Scholar
  78. Oberwittler, D. (2013). Wohnquartiere und Kriminalität – Überblick über die Forschung zu den sozialräumlichen Dimensionen urbaner Kriminalität. In D. Oberwittler, S. Rabold & D. Baier (Hrsg.), Städtische Armutsquartiere – Kriminelle Lebenswelten? Studien zu sozialräumlichen Kontexteffekten auf Jugendkriminalität und Kriminalitätswahrnehmungen (S. 45 – 96). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  79. Oberwittler, D., Rabold, S., & Baier, D. (Hrsg.). (2013). Städtische Armutsquartiere – Kriminelle Lebenswelten? Studien zu sozialräumlichen Kontexteffekten auf Jugendkriminalität und Kriminalitätswahrnehmungen. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  80. Oberwittler, D., & Gerstner, D. (2015). Die Modellierung von Interaktionseffekten in Erklärungsmodellen selbstberichteter Delinquenz – Ein empirischer Vergleich von linearer OLS-Regression und negativer Binomialregression anhand der Wechselwirkungen von Risikoorientierungen und Scham. In S. Eifer & D. Pollich (Hrsg.), Empirische Forschung über Kriminalität. Methodologische und methodische Grundlagen (S. 275 – 302). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  81. Opp, K.-D. (1968). Zur Erklärung delinquenten Verhaltens von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Eine ökologische Analyse der Kinder- und Jugenddelinquenz in Köln und eine Kritik des kriminal-ökologischen Ansatzes. München.Google Scholar
  82. Papachristos, A. V., Hureau, D. M., & Braga, A. A. (2013). The corner and the crew: the influence of geography and social networks on gang violence. American Sociological Review 78(3), 417 – 447.Google Scholar
  83. Patchin, J. W., Huebner, B. M., McCluskey, J. D., Varano, S. P., & Bynum, T. S. (2006). Exposure to community violence and childhood delinquency. Crime & Delinquency 52(2), 307 – 332.Google Scholar
  84. Pauwels, L. (2007). Buurtinvloeden en jeugddelinquentie. Een toets van de Sociale Desorganisatietheorie. Den Haag.Google Scholar
  85. Pauwels, L. J., Weerman, F. M., Bruinsma, G. J. N., & Bernasco, W. (2015). How much variance in offending, self-control and morality can be explained by neighbourhoods and schools? An exploratory cross-classified multi-level analysis. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 21(4), 523 – 537.Google Scholar
  86. Payne, A. A. (2008). A multilevel analysis of the relationships among communal school organization, student bonding, and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 45(4), 429 – 455.Google Scholar
  87. Payne, A. A., Gottfredson, D. C., & Gottfredson, G. D. (2003). Schools as communities: the relationships among communal school organization, student bonding, and school disorder. Criminology 41(3), 749 – 777.Google Scholar
  88. Pettit, B. (2004). Moving and children’s social connections: neighborhood context and the consequences of moving for low-income families. Sociological Forum 19(2), 285 – 311.Google Scholar
  89. Rabold, S., & Baier, D. (2010). Why are some ethnic groups more violent than others? the role of friendship network’s ethnic composition. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 26(15), 3127 – 3156.Google Scholar
  90. Rovers, B. (1997). De Buurt een Broeinest? Een onderzoek naar de invloed van woonomgeving op jeugdcriminaliteit. Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  91. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing „neighborhood effects“: social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology 28, 443 – 478.Google Scholar
  92. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Social anatomy of racial and ethnic disparities in violence. American Journal of Public Health 95(2), 224 – 232.Google Scholar
  93. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. J. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277, 918 – 924.Google Scholar
  94. Schaefer, D. R. (2012). Youth co-offending networks: An investigation of social and spatial effects Social Networks 34(1), 141 – 149.Google Scholar
  95. Sharkey, P. (2010). The acute effect of local homicides on children’s cognitive performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(26), 11733 – 11738.Google Scholar
  96. Sharkey, P., & Faber, J. W. (2014). Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology 40(1), 559 – 579.Google Scholar
  97. Schonberg, M. A., & Shaw, D. S. (2007). Do the predictors of child conduct problems vary by high- and low-levels of socioeconomic and neighborhood risk?. Clinical Child and Family Psychology 10(2), 101 – 136.Google Scholar
  98. Shaw, C., & McKay, H. D. (1969 [1942]). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago.Google Scholar
  99. van Ham, M., & Manley, D. (2012). Neighbourhood Effects Research at a Crossroads: Ten Challenges for Future Research (Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten, Working Paper Series 204)Google Scholar
  100. Weerman, F. M. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: a longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology 49(1), 253 – 286.Google Scholar
  101. Wickes, R., Hipp, J., Sargeant, E., & Mazerolle, L. (2016). Neighborhood social ties and shared expectations for informal social control: do they influence informal social control actions? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1 – 29.Google Scholar
  102. Wikström, P.-O. H., & Butterworth, D. (2006). Adolescent crime: individual differences and lifestyle risks. Cullompton.Google Scholar
  103. Wikström, P.-O. H. (2007). The social ecology of crime. The role of the environment in crime causation. In H. J. Schneider (Hrsg.), Internationales Handbuch der Kriminologie, Bd. 1: Grundlagen der Kriminologie (S. 333 – 357). Berlin.Google Scholar
  104. Wikström, P.-O. H., Ceccato, V., Hardie, B., & Treiber, K. (2010). Activity fields and the dynamics of crime. advancing knowledge about the role of the environment in crime causation. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 26(1), 55 – 86.Google Scholar
  105. Wikström, P.-O. H., Oberwittler, D., Hardie, B., & Treiber, K. (2012). Breaking rules. The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford.Google Scholar
  106. Wikström, P.-O. H., & Treiber, K. (2016). Situational theory: The importance of interactions and action mechanisms in the explanation of crime. In A. R. Piquero (Hrsg.), The Handbook of Criminological Theory (S. 415 – 444). Chicester.Google Scholar
  107. Wilson, W. J. (1997). When work disappears: the world of the new urban poor. New York.Google Scholar
  108. Wodtke, G. T., Harding, D. J., & Elwert, F. (2011). Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective: the impact of long-term exposure to concentrated disadvantage on high school graduation. American Sociological Review 76(5), 713 – 736.Google Scholar
  109. Zimmerman, G. M. (2016). Examining gendered pathways in the causal chain linking neighborhood navigational strategies and unstructured socializing to adolescent violent offending. Journal of Criminal Justice 46, 94 – 105.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Freiburg i. Br.Deutschland

Personalised recommendations