Innovation und Trends für Mobiles Lernen

  • Marcus Specht
  • Marco Kalz
  • Dirk Börner

Abstract

Abstract: Der Beitrag zeigt aktuelle Trends im Bereich der mobilen und ubiquitären Lerntechnologien auf, welche die klassischen Konzepte von Mobilem Lernen erweitern: a) Mobiler und allgegenwärtiger Zugang zu Lerninhalten, b) unterbrechungsfreie Lernunterstützung oder „Seamless Learning Support“, die nahtlose Integration von Lernunterstützung in gemischten Lernszenarien, c) Smartphones und Sensoren im Mobilen Lernen d) Mobile Gaming und mobile Augmented Reality, e) situierte eingebettete Displays. Anhand dieser Trends werden die Konsequenzen für das didaktische Design und darunter liegende Lernkonzepte diskutiert.

Schlüsselbegriffe

Trends mobile Lerntechnologien Kontext Ubiquitous Learning 

Literatur

  1. Adkins, S. (2011). The Worldwide Market for Mobile Learning Products and Services. 2012–2015 Forecast and Analysis. Ambient Insight Comprehensive Report. USA: Monroe.Google Scholar
  2. Akkerman, S. Admiraal, W. & Huizenga, J. (2009). Storification in History education: A mobile game in and about medieval Amsterdam. Computers & Education 52 (2), 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ally, M. (Hrsg.) (2009). Mobile learning – Transforming the delivery of education and training (Vol. 7). Edmonton, AB: AU Press.Google Scholar
  4. Björk, S. & Holopainen, J. (2004). Patterns in Game Design. Boston, MA: Charles River Media.Google Scholar
  5. Börner, D., Glahn, C., Stoyanov, S., Kalz, M., & Specht, M. (2010). Expert concept mapping study on mobile learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems 27 (4), 240–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonanni, L. (2006). Living with Hyper-reality. In Y. Cai & J. Abascal (Hrsg.), Ambient Intelligence in Everyday Life (Vol. 3864, S. 130–141). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer, J., Williams, A., & Dourish, P. (2007). A Handle on What’s Going On: Combining Tangible Interfaces and Ambient Displays for Collaborative Groups. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (S. 3–10). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, E., Sharples, M., Clough, G., Tangney, B., Wishart, J., Wijers, M., Jonker, V., et al. (2010). Education in the wild: contextual and location-based mobile learning in action (S. 56). Nottingham, UK. http://dspace.ou.nl/handle/1820/2840. Zugegriffen: 28. August 2012.
  9. Cisco (2012). Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2011–2016. Whitepaper. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/white_paper_c11–520862.pdf. Zugegriffen: 28. August 2012.
  10. Cook, J. (2010). Mobile Phones as Mediating Tools Within Augmented Contexts for Development. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 2 (3), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davidsson, O., Peitz, J., & Björk, S. (2004). Game design patterns for mobile games. Project report to Nokia Research Center, Finland. http://procyon.lunarpages.com/~gamed3/docs/Game_Design_Patterns_for_Mobile_Games.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. August 2010.
  12. DeLoache, J., Uttal, D., & Rosengren, K. (2004). Scale errors offer evidence for a perception-action dissociation early in life. Science 304, 1027–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dias, A. (2009). Technology Enhanced Learning and Augmented Reality: An Application on Multimedia Interactive Books. International Business And Economics Review 1 (1), 69–79.Google Scholar
  14. Endsley, M. R. (2000). Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. In M. R. Endsley & D. J. Garland (Hrsg.), Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Ferscha, A. (2007). A Matter of Taste. In B. Schiele, A. K. Dey, H. Gellersen, B. Ruyter, M. Tscheligi, R. Wichert, E. Aarts, et al. (Hrsg.), Ambient Intelligence (Vol. 4794, S. 287–304) Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gros, B. (2007). Digital games in education: The design of games-based learning environments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 40 (1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hazlewood, W. R., Connelly, K., Makice, K., & Lim, Y. (2008). Exploring evaluation methods for ambient information systems. Proceeding of the twentysixth annual CHI conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (S. 2973–2978). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  18. Holmquist, L., Redström, J., & Ljungstrand, P. (1999). Token-based access to digital information. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing (HUC’99), 234–245.Google Scholar
  19. Ishii, H. & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’97), 234–241.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2009). The 2009 Horizon Report. Horizon (S. 1–40). The New Media Consortium. http://wp.nmc.org/horizon2009/. Zugegriffen: 28. August 2012.
  21. Kelle, S., Klemke, R. & Specht, M. (2011). Design patterns for learning games, International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 3 (6), 555–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiili, K. & Ketamo, H. (2007). Exploring the Learning Mechanism in Educational Games. Journal of Computing and Information Technology 15 (4), 319–324.Google Scholar
  23. Koleva, B., Benford, S., Ng, K. H., & Rodden, T. (2003). A Framework for Tangible User Interfaces. Interfaces, 46–50.Google Scholar
  24. Kotranza, A., Scott Lind, D., Pugh, C. M., & Lok, B. (2009). Real-Time In-Situ Visual Feedback of Task Performance in Mixed Environments for Learning Joint Psychomotor-Cognitive Tasks. In Klinker, G., Saito H., Hollerer, T. (Hrsg.), 8th IEEE International Symposium Zon Mixed and Augmented Reality (S. 125–134). IEEE.Google Scholar
  25. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development 37 (2), 135–148.Google Scholar
  26. Lamantia, J. (2009). Inside Out: Interaction Design for Augmented Reality. http://www.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/08/inside-out-interaction-design-for-augmented-reality.php. Zugegriffen: 28. August 2012.
  27. Lilly, J. & Warnes, M. (2009). Designing Mobile Games for Learning: The mGBL Approach. In O. Petrovic & A. Brand (Hrsg.), Serious Games on the Move (S. 3–27). Wien: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maciuszek, D., Ladhoff, S. & Martens, A. (2011). Content Design Patterns for Game Based Learning. International Journal of Game Based Learning 1 (3), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mankoff, J., Dey, A. K., Hsieh, G., Kientz, J., Lederer, S., & Ames, M. (2003). Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (S. 169–176). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  30. Markovic, F., Petrovic, O., Kittl, C., & Edegger, B. (2007). Pervasive learning games: A comparative study. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 13 (2), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Luís Saorín, J., Contero, M., Alcañiz, M., Pérez-López, D. C. , & Ortega, M. (2010). Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics 34 (1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Minakuchi, M., Nakamura, S., & Tanaka, K. (2005). AmbientBrowser: Web Browser for Everyday Enrichment. In M. Maybury, O. Stock, & W. Wahlster (Hrsg.), Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (Vol. 3814, S. 94–103). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method. New York: Frederick Stokes, Co.Google Scholar
  34. Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. Handbook of research on educational communications, 745–784.Google Scholar
  35. O’Malley, C., & Fraser, D. S. (2004). Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies. Policy. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190328/. Zugegriffen: 28. August 2012.
  36. Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2004). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning. Bristol: NESTA FutureLab.Google Scholar
  37. Oppermann, R., & Specht, M. (1999). A Nomadic Information System for Adaptive Exhibition Guidance. Archives and Museum Informatics 13 (2), 0. Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1023/A:1016619506241.Google Scholar
  38. Oxford Dictionaries. (2010). Oxford University Press. http://oxforddictionaries.com. Zugegriffen: 28. August 2012.
  39. Pousman, Z., & Stasko, J. (2006). A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design. Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces (S. 67–74). ACM New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Prensky, M. (2007). Digital Game-Based Learning: Practical Ideas for the Application of Digital Game-Based Learning. St. Paul, Minneapolis: Paragon House 2007.Google Scholar
  41. Rao, N., Sasidhar, C., & Satyendra K. V. (2010). Cloud Computing through mobile-learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 1 (6), 42–47.Google Scholar
  42. Reitberger, W., Obermair, C., Ploderer, B., Meschtscherjakov, A., & Tscheligi, M. (2007). Enhancing the Shopping Experience with Ambient Displays: A Field Study in a Retail Store. In B. Schiele, A. K. Dey, H. Gellersen, B. Ruyter, M. Tscheligi, R. Wichert, E. Aarts, et al. (Hrsg.), Ambient Intelligence (Vol. 4794, S. 314–331). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schaffert, S., & Kalz, M. (2009). Persönliche Lernumgebungen: Grundlagen, Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen eines neuen Konzepts. In K. Wilbers & A. Hohenstein (Hrsg.), Handbuch E-Learning (Gruppe 5, Nr. 5.16, S. 1–24). 27. Erg.-Lfg. Köln: Deutscher Wirtschaftsdienst.Google Scholar
  44. Schmalstieg, D., & Wagner, D. (2007). Experiences with handheld augmented reality. http://www.icg.tu-graz.ac.at/pub/pdf/ismar07keynotepaper/download. Zugegriffen: 28. August 2012.
  45. Schmitz, B., Klemke, R. & Specht, M. (in press). Mobile gaming patterns and their impact on learning outcomes: A literature review. In Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., & Hernández-Leo, D. (Hrsg.), 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2012, Saarbrücken, Germany, September 18–21.Google Scholar
  46. Sedig, K., Klawe, M., & Westrom, M. (2001). Role of interface manipulation style and scaffolding on cognition and concept learning in learnware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 8 (1), 34–59. ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shen, X., Moere, A. V., Eades, P., & Hong, S. (2008). The long-term evaluation of Fisherman in a partial-attention environment. Proceedings of the 2008 conference on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  48. Specht, M., & Kravcik, M. (2006). Authoring of Learning Objects in Context. International Journal on Elearning 5 (1), 25–33.Google Scholar
  49. Specht, M. (2009). Learning in a Technology Enhanced World: Context in Ubiquitous Learning Support. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland. http://dspace.ou.nl/handle/1820/2034. Zugegriffen: 28. August 2012.
  50. Specht, M., Ternier, S., & Greller, W. (2011). Mobile Augmented Reality for Learning: A Case Study. Journal Of The Research Center For Educational Technology 7 (1). http://www.rcetj.org/index.php/rcetj/article/view/151. Zugegriffen: 18. Januar 2012.
  51. Stasko, J., Miller, T., Pousman, Z., Plaue, C., & Ullah, O. (2004). Personalized Peripheral Information Awareness Through Information Art. In N. Davies, E. D. Mynatt, & I. Siio (Hrsg.), UbiComp 2004 (S. 18–35). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. STELLAR. The European Network of Excellence in TEL. http://www.stellarnet.eu/ .Zugegriffen: 28. Februar 2013.
  53. Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a Mobile Age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 1 (March), 1–12.Google Scholar
  54. Trochim, W. (1989). Concept mapping: soft science or hard art?, In Trochim, W. (Hrsg.), A Special Issue of Evaluation and Program Planning (S. 87–110). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  55. Uttal, D. H., Scudder, K. V., & DeLoache, J. S. (1997). Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 18 (1), 37–54. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weiser, M. (1993). Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM 36 (7), 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wijers, M., Jonker, V., & Drijvers, P. (2010). MobileMath: exploring mathematics outside the classroom. ZDM 42 (7), 789–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wisneski, C., Ishii, H., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M., Brave, S., Ullmer, B., & Yarin, P. (1998). Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings (Vol. 1370, S. 22–32).Google Scholar
  59. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education 57(4), 2364–2381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2012). Enculturing self-directed seamless learners: towards a facilitated seamless learning process framework mediated by mobile technology. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education 2012, 1–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus Specht
  • Marco Kalz
  • Dirk Börner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations