Advertisement

Sheila Jasanoff: Wissenschafts- und Technikpolitik in zeitgenössischen, demokratischen Gesellschaften

  • Melike Şahinol
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Vorliegender Aufsatz stellt zunächst einen biographischen Überblick über Sheila Jasanoffs Wirken als eine der Pionierinnen in den „Science & Technology Studies“ (STS) dar. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Monographie „Designs on Nature“ werden die zentralen theoretischen Bezüge, Methoden, Thesen, Ergebnisse und Anwendungsfelder dargestellt. Die Weiterentwicklung ihrer Konzepte co-production und civic epistemologies mündet schließlich in ihr komparatives Projekt der sociotechnical imagineries, das diesen Artikel abrundet.

Literatur

  1. Brickman, Ronald, Sheila Jasanoff, und Thomas Ilgen. 1985. Controlling chemicals: The politics of regulation in Europe and the United States. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  2. Burri, R. V. 2008. Book reviews: Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Science Technology & Human Values 33 (1): 134–137. doi:10.1177/0895904805303204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Felt, Ulrike, und Brian Wynne. 2007. Taking European knowledge society seriously. Economy and society directorate, directorate-general for research, Luxembourg, office for official publications of the European communities.Google Scholar
  4. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1994. The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  5. Jasanoff, Sheila. 1997/1995. Science at the bar: Law, science, and technology in America. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on nature: Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  7. Jasanoff, Sheila. 2013/2004. States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Jasanoff, Sheila, und Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47 (2): 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jasanoff, Sheila, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Peterson, und Trevor Pinch. 2001/1995. Handbook of science and technology studies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Jasanoff, Sheila, Sam Evans, Will Firestone, Ben Hurlbut, Sang-Hyung Kim, und Lee Vinse. 2013. The sociotechnical imaginaries project: Program on science, technology and society (STS) 2013. http://sts.hks.harvard.edu/research/platforms/imaginaries/. Zugegriffen: 23. April 2013.
  11. Kurath, Monika. 2009. Nanotechnology governance: Accountability and governance in new modes of regulation and deliberation. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies 5 (2): 87–110.Google Scholar
  12. Marcus, George E. 1998. Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  13. Pickersgill, Martyn. 2011. Connecting neuroscience and law: Anticipatory discourse and the role of sociotechnical imaginaries. New Genetics and Society 30 (1): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith, Elta. 2009. Imaginaries of development: The rockefeller foundation and rice research. Science as Culture 18 (4): 461–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für SoziologieUniversität Duisburg-EssenDuisburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations