Advertisement

Theory-driven evaluation: Conceptual framework, application and advancement

  • Huey T. Chen

Zusammenfassung

There is an impressive amount of literature on theory-driven evaluation published in the past few decades. The literature devoted to this topic includes four volumes of New Directions for Evaluation (Bickman 1987, 1990; Rogers, Hasci, Petrosino, & Huebner 2000; Wholey 1987), several books (Chen 1990, 2005; Chen/Rossi 1992; (Connell, Kubisch, Schorr, & Weiss 1995; Fulbright-Anderson, Kubisch, & Connell 1998; Pawson & Tilly 1997) and numerous articles published in various journals (see recent review by (Coryn, Noakes, Westine, & Schoter 2011; Hansen & Vedung 2010).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Bickman, L. (Ed.). (1987). Using program theory in evaluation. San Francisco Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Bickman, L. (Ed.). (1990). Advances in program theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: RandMcNally.Google Scholar
  4. Chen H.T./Donaldson, S. L./Mark, M. M. (2011). Validity Frameworks for Outcome Evaluation In C. HT, S. L. Donaldson & M. M. Mark (Eds.), Advancing Validity. In: Outcome Evaluation: Theory and Practice (Vol. Forthcoming). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, H. T. (1988). Validity in evaluation research: a critical assessment of current issues. Policy and Politics, 16(1), S. 1-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, H. T. (1997). Normative evaluation of an anti-drug abuse program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(2), S. 195-204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, H. T. (2005). Practical program evaluation: assessing and improving planning, implementation, and effectiveness. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, H. T. (2010). The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: a new perspective for program evaluation. Eval Program Plann, 33(3), S. 205-214. doi: S0149-7189(09)00101-3 [pii]10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, H. T./Garbe P. (2011). Assessing Program Outcomes from the Bottom-Up Approach: An Innovative Perspective to Outcome Evaluation. In: H. T. Chen, S. L. Donaldson & M. M. Mark (Eds.), Advancing Validity in Outcome Evaluation: Theory and Practice (Vol. Forthcoming). San Franscisco Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, H. T./Quane, J./Garland, T. N. (1988). Evaluating an antismoking program. Evaluation and the Health Professions 11(4), S. 441-464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, H. T./Rossi, P. H. (1983). The theory-driven approach to validity. Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, S. 95-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connell, J. P./Kubisch, A. C./Schorr, L. B./Weiss, C. H. (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods and contexts. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Cook, T. D./Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  15. Coryn, C. L. S./Noakes, L. A./Westine, C. D./Schoter, D. (2011). A systematic review of theory-driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(2), S. 199-266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coxe, S./West, S. G./Aiken, L. S. (2009). The analysis of count data: a gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives. J Pers Assess, 91(2), 121-136. doi: 908606900 [pii]10.1080/00223890802634175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Donaldson, S. L./Christie, C. A./Mark, M. M. E. (2008). What counts as credible evidence in applied and evaluation pracrtice? Newbury Park, CA: sage.Google Scholar
  19. Fulbright-Anderson, K./Kubisch, A. C./Connell, J. P. (Eds.). (1998). New approaches to evaluating community innitiatives. Vol. 2: Theory, measurement and analysis.Washington, D.C.: Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Glasgow, R. E.,/Lichtenstein, E./Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-toeffectiveness transition. Am J Public Health, 93(8), S. 1261-1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greene, J./Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advanced in mixed-method evaluation: Teh chanllenge and benefits of integarting diverse paradigm (Vol. 74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Hansen, M. B./Vedung, E. (2010). Theory-Based Stakeholder Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 295-313. doi:10.1177/1098214010366174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huffman, D./Lawrenz, F. (Eds.). (2006). Critical Issues in STEM Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Kristal, A. R./Glanz, K./Tilley, B. C./Li, S. (2000). Mediating factors in dietary change: Understanding the impact of a worksite nutrition intervention. Health Education & Behavior, 27(1), S. 112-125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller, W. R./Toscova, R. T./Miller, J. H./Sanchez, V. (2000). A theory-based motivational approach for reducing alcohol/drug problems in college. [Evaluation Studies Multicenter Study Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. Health Educ Behav, 27(6), S. 744-759.Google Scholar
  26. Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-Focused Evaluation (3d ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Pawson, R., /Tilly, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Posavac, E. J., /Carey, R. G. (2007). Program Evaluation: Methods and Case Studies. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, P. J./Hasci, T. A./Petrosino, A./Huebner, T. A. (Eds.). (2000). Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and Opportunites (Vol. 87). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Rossi, P. H./Lipsey, M. W./Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Shadish, W. R./Cook, T. D./Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  32. Tashakkori, A.,/Teddlie, c. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Weiss, C. (1998). Evaluation (2nd edition ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Wholey, J. S. (Ed.). (1987). Using program theory in evaluation (Vol. 33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huey T. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.MontclairUSA

Personalised recommendations