Wahrnehmungsphänomene

Literatur

1. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton Miff lin.Google Scholar
2. Armor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2002). When Predictions Fail: Th e Dilemma of Unrealistic Optimism. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Hrsg.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (S. 334–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Optimistic Bias in Adolescent and Adult Smokers and Nonsmokers. Addictive Behaviors 25, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Aronson, E., Wilson, T., & Akert, R. M. (2008). Sozialpsychologie (4. Aufl.). München: Pearson Studium.Google Scholar
5. Arpan, L. M., & Raney, A. A. (2003). An Experimental Investigation of News Source and the Hostile Media Effect. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 80, 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Brosius, H.-B., & Engel, D. (1997). ‚Die Medien beeinfl ussen vielleicht die anderen, aber mich doch nicht‘: Zu den Ursachen des Third-Person-Effekts. Publizistik 42, 325–345.Google Scholar
7. Chambers, J. R. (2008). Explaining False Uniqueness: Why We Are Both Better and Worse Th an Others. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2, 878–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Clarke, V. A., Lovegrove, H., Williams, A., & Macpherson, M. (2000). Unrealisltic Optimism and the Health Belief Model. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 23, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Cohen, J., Mutz, D. C., Price, V., & Gunther, A. C. (1988). Perceived Impact of Defamation. An Experiment on Third Person Effects. Public Opinion Quarterly 52, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Davison, W. P. (1983). The Third-Person-Effect in Communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 47, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Dohle, M. & Hartmann, T. (2008). Alles eine Frage hoher Reichweite ? Eine experimentelle Untersuchung zur Ursache der Entstehung von Hostile-Media-Eff ekten. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 56, 21–41.Google Scholar
12. Donsbach, W. (1991). Medienwirkung trotz Selektion. Einfl ussfaktoren auf die Zuwendung zu Zeitungsinhalten. Köln, Weimar, Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
13. Dunning, D., Chip, H., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed Self-Assessment. Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5, 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Eiser, J. R. (1996). Positive-Negative Asymmetry. In A. S. R. Manstead, & M. Hewstone (Hrsg.), Th e Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology (S. 499). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
15. Esser, H. (2000). Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 2: Die Konstruktion der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.Google Scholar
16. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston: Row, Peterson & Company.Google Scholar
17. Fields, J. M., & Schuman, H. (1976). Public Beliefs about the Beliefs of the Public. Public Opinion Quarterly 40, 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Friedrich, J. (1993). Primary Error Detection and Minimization (PEDMIN) Strategies in Social Cognition: A Reinterpretation of Confirmation Bias Phenomena. Psychological Review 100, 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The Structure of Foreign News: The Presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in Four Foreign Newspapers. Journal of International Peace Research 2, 64–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Gerrard, M., & Luus, C. A. E. (1995). Judgments of Vulnerability to Pregnancy: The Role of Risk Factors and Individual Differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Gilbert, G. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The Correspondence Bias. Psychological Bulletin 117, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Golan, G., & Day, A. (2008). The First-Person Effect and its Behavioral Consequences: A New Trend in the Twenty-Five Year History of Third-Person Effect Research. Mass Communication and Society 11, 539–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Gunther, A. C. (1992). Bias Press or Biased Public? Attitudes Toward Media Coverage of Social Groups. Public Opinion Quarterly 56, 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Gunther, A. C. (1998). The Persuasive Press Inference: Effects of Mass Media on Perceived Public Opinion. Communication Research 25, 486–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Gunther, A. C., & Chia, S. C. (2001). Predicting Pluralistic Ignorance: The Hostile Media Perception and its Consequences. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 78, 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (2002). Projection or Persuasive Press ? Contrary Eff ects of Personal Opinion and Perceived News Coverage on Estimates of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication 52, 177–195.Google Scholar
27. Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2006). Broad Reach or Biased Source? Decomposing the Hostile Media Effect. Journal of Communication 56, 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Gunther, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The Influence of Presumed Influence. Journal of Communication 53, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Hansen, G. J., & Kim, H. (2011). Is the Media Biased Against Me? A Meta-Analysis of the Hostile Media Effect Research. Communication Research Reports 28, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Huck, I. (2009). Wahrnehmungen und Wahrnehmungsphänomene im Agenda-Setting-Prozess. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Huck, I., & Brosius, H.-B. (2007). Der Third-Person-Effekt – Über den vermuteten Einfluss der Massenmedien. Publizistik 52, 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Huck, I., Quiring, O., & Brosius, H.-B. (2009). Perceptual phenomena in the agenda setting process. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21, 139–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The Actor and the Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Hrsg.), Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behaviour (S. 79–94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
34. Kepplinger, H. M., & Roth, H. (1978). Kommunikation in der Ölkrise des Winters 1973 / 74. Ein Paradigma für Wirkungsstudien. Publizistik 23, 337–356.Google Scholar
35. Klapper, J. (1960). Effects of Mass Communication. Toronto: Free Press.Google Scholar
36. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The People’s Choice. How the Voter Makes Up his Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.Google Scholar
37. Lo, V.-H., & Wei, R. (2002). Third-Person Effect, Gender, and Pornography on the Internet. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 46, 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten Years of Research on the False-Consensus Effect: An Empirical and Theoretical Review. Psychological Bulletin 102, 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Maurer, M., & Reinemann, C. (2003). Schrödergegen Stoiber – Nutzung, Wahrnehmung und Wirkung der TV-Duelle. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
40. Meyer, W.-U., & Försterling, F. (2001). Die Attributionstheorie. In F. Dieter & M. Irle (Hrsg.), Th eorien der Sozialpsychologie. Band I: Kognitive Th eorien (2. Auf., S. 220–201). Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.Google Scholar
41. Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 949–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Mullen, B., Dovidio, J. F., Johnson, C., & Copper, C. (1992). Ingroup-Outgroup Differences in Social Projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 28, 422–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Mutz, D. C. (1989). The Influence of Perceptions of Media Influence: Third Person Effects and the Public Expression of Opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 1, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1980). Das doppelte Meinungsklima. Der Einfl uß des Fernsehens im Wahlkampf 1976. In E. Noelle-Neumann, Wahlentscheidung in der Fernsehdemokratie (S. 77 – 115). Freiburg, München: Alber.Google Scholar
45. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1991). Öff entliche Meinung. Die Entdeckung der Schweigespirale. Frankfurt a. M.: Ullstein.Google Scholar
46. Norenzayan, A., Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural Similarities and Differences in Social Inference: Evidence from Behavioral Predictions and Lay Theories of Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. Oswald, M. E., & Grosjean, S. (2004). Confirmation Bias. In R. F. Pohl (Hrsg.), Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory (S. 79–96). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
48. Paul, B., Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (2000). The Third-Person-Effect. A Meta-Analysis of the Perceptual Hypothesis. Mass Communication and Society 3, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49. Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects. European Review of Social Psychology 1, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50. Perloff, M. R. (2009). Mass Media, Social Perception, and the Third-Person Effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Hrsg.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (3. Aufl., S. 252–268.Google Scholar
51. Riskey, D. R., & Birnbaum, M. H. (1974). Compensatory Effects in Moral Judgment: Two Rights Don’t Make Up for a Wrong. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103, 171–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Robinson, M. J. (1976). Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of „Th e Selling of the Pentagon“. American Political Science Review 70, 409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. Roessing, T. (2011). Schweigespirale. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
54. Ross, L. (1977). The Intuitive Psychologist and his Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process. In L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (S. 174–214). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
55. Ross, L., Green, D., & House, P. (1977). The ‚False Consensus‘ Effect: An Egocentric Bias in Social Perception and Attribution Processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13, 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. Rossmann, C. (2010). Zur theorie- und evidenzbasierten Fundierung massenmedialer Gesundheitskampagnen. Public Health Forum 18, 16–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57. Rothman, A. J., Klein, W. M., & Weinstein, N. D. (1996). Absolute and Relative Biases in Estimations of Personal Risk. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26, 1213–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58. Rozin, P., & Royzman, B. (2001). Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59. Scherer, H., Tiele, A. & Naab, T. (2006). Die Theorie der Schweigespirale: methodische Herausforderungen und empirische Forschungspraxis. In W. Wirth, A. Fahr & E. Lauf (Hrsg.), Forschungslogik und -design in der Kommunikationswissenschaft, Band 2: Anwendungsfelder in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 107–138). Köln: Herbert von Halem.Google Scholar
60. Schmitt, K. M., Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2004). Why Partisans see Mass Media as Biased. Communication Research 31, 623–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61. Shepperd, J. A., Ouellette, J. A., & Fernandez, J. K. (1996). Abandoning Unrealistic Optimism: Performance Estimates and the Temporal Proximity of Self-Relevant Feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70, 844–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62. Sun, Y., Shen, L., & Pan, Z. (2008). On the Behavioral Component of the Third-Person-Effect. Communication Research, 35, 257–278.Google Scholar
63. Taylor, D. G. (1982). Pluralistic Ignorance and the Spiral of Silence. A Formal Analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 46, 311–335.Google Scholar
64. Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The Child in America. Behavior Problems and Programs. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
65. Thompson, S. C. (1999). Illusions of Control: How We Overestimate Our Personal Influence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8, 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66. Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The Hostile Media Phenomenon: Bias Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the Beirut Massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 12, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
68. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic Optimism about Future Life Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 806–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
69. Weinstein, N. D. (1987). Unrealistic Optimism about Susceptibility to Health Problems: Conclusions from a Community-Wide Sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 10, 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70. Weinstein, N. D. (1998). Accuracy of Smokers’ Risk Perceptions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 20, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71. Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2009). What Underlies the False Consensus Effect ? How Personal Opinion and Disagreement Affect Public Opinion Perception. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72. Wolling, J. (1999). Politikverdrossenheit durch Massenmedien ? Der Einfl uss der Medien auf die Einstellungen der Bürger zur Politik. Opladen, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar