Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations: Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten. Eine Einleitung.

Chapter

Zusammenfassung

This publication was motivated by the Annual conference of the German Communication Association, Public Relations/Organisational Communication division during November 2010 in Leipzig, Germany. Under the thematic guidance of “Organisational communication and communication management“ a wide platform was established for discussion of all aspects of organisational communication and a greater foundation was enabled for communication management within organisational studies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Baecker, Dirk 2007. The network synthesis of social action I: Towards a sociological theory of next society. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 14(4): 9-42.Google Scholar
  2. Baerns, Barbara 1995. PR-Erfolgskontrolle: Messen und Bewerten in der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. Verfahren, Strategien, Beispiele. Frankfurt am Main: IMK, Institut für Medienentwicklung und Kommunikation.Google Scholar
  3. Bentele, Günter, Romy Fröhlich, und Peter Szyszka. 2005. Handbuch der Public Relations. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und berufliches Handeln. Mit Lexikon. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  4. Bernays, Edward L. 1928. Propaganda. New York: Horace LiverightGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernays, Edward L. 1952. Public Relations. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bernays, Edward L., und Howard W. Cutler 1956. The engineering of consent. Norman,OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  7. Besson, Nanette A. 2008. Strategische PR-Evaluation: Erfassung, Bewertung und Kontrolle von Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. 3. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  8. Broom, Glen M. 2009. Cutlip & Center‘s Effective public relations. 10. Auflage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Pearson.Google Scholar
  9. Cheney, George, Lars Thøger Christensen, Theodore Zorn, und Shiv Ganesh. 2004. Organizational Communication in an age of globalization: Issues, reflections, practices. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cheney, George, und Lars Thøger Christensen. 2001. Public relations as contested terrain: A critical response. In Handbook of Public Relations, eds. Robert L. Heath, und Gabriel Vasquez, 167-181. Thousand Oaks, CF: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crijns, Rogier, und Nina Janich (Hrsg.). 2005. Interne Kommunikation von Unternehmen: psychologische, kommunikationsWissenschaftliche und kulturvergleichende Studien. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Curtis, Adam. 2002. The century of the self, Part 1. Documentary. London: BBC.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, Lee. 2012. Defi ning the ‘object’ of public relations research: A new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry 1(1): 7-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisenberg, Eric M., Harold L. Goodall Jr., und Angela Trethewey. 2010. Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  15. Flynn, Terence. 2006. A delicate equilibrium: Balancing theory, practice and outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research 18(2): 191-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making social science matter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Grunig, James E. 2006. Furnishing the edifice: Ongoing research on public relations as a strategic management function. Journal of Public Relations Research 18: 151-176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grunig, James E., Larissa Grunig, und David Dozier. 2002. Excellent public relations and Effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Grunig, James E., und Todd Hunt. 1984. Managing Public Relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  20. Heath, Robert L. 2010. The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations. 2. Auflage. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  21. Herger, Nikodemus. 2006. Organisationskommunikation: Beobachtung und Steuerung eines organisationalen Risikos. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  22. Herger, Nikodemus. 2006. Vertrauen und Organisationskommunikation: Identität – Marke - Image - Reputation. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  23. Heron, Alexander R. 1942. Sharing information wiThemployees. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hoy, Peggy. 2002. Ansätze und Probleme der PR-Historiographie. Ein Vergleich der PRGeschichtsschreibung in den USA und Deutschland anhand einer systematischen Literaturbestandsaufnahme. Unveröff entlichte Magisterarbeit, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
  25. Hoy, Peggy, Oliver Raaz, und Stefan Wehmeier. 2007. From facts to stories or from stories to facts? Analyzing public relations history in public relations textbooks. Public Relations Review 33(1): 191-200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hundhausen, Carl. 1938. Public Relations. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 15 (1): 48-61.Google Scholar
  27. Ihlen, Øvind, Betteke vanRuler, und Magnus Fredriksson (Hrsg.). 2009. Public relations and social theory. Key figures and concepts. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Jablin, Fredric M., und Linda L. Putnam. 2005. The new handbook of organizational communication. Advances in theory, research, and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Jablin, Fredric M., Linda L Putnam, Karlene H Roberts, und Lyman W. Porter. 1987. Handbook of organizational communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Jackall, Robert. 1988. Moral mazes. The world of corporate managers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Jackall, Robert, und Janice M. Hirota 2000. Image makers. Advertising, public relations and the ethos of advocacy. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jarren, Otfried, und Ulrike Röttger. 2009. Steuerung, Refl exierung und Interpe-netration: Kernelemente einer strukturationstheoretisch begründeten PR-Theorie. In Theorien der Public Relations. Grundlagen und Perspektiven der PR-Forschung, hrsg. Ulrike Röttger, 29-50. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplan, Robert S. 1994. Management accounting (1984-1994): Development of new practiceand theory. Management Accounting Research (5): 247-260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelly, Kathleen S. 2001. Stewardship: The fift h step in the public relations process. In Handbook of Public Relations, eds. Robert L. Heath, und Gabriel Vasquez, 279-290. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Kieser, Alfred. 1998. Über die allmähliche Verfertigung der Organisation beim Ren.de Industrielle Beziehungen 5 (1): 45-75.Google Scholar
  36. Kussin, Matthias. 2006. Public Relations als Funktion moderner Organisation: soziologische Analysen. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Lippmann, Walter. 1922. An inquiry into the principles of the good society. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  38. Lippmann, Walter. 1922. Public opinion. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Locke, Karen, Karen Golden-Biddle, und Martha S. Feldman. 2008. Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organization Science 19(6):907-918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Menz, Florian, und Andreas Müller. 2009. Organisationskommunikation: Grundlagen und Analysen der sprachlichen Inszenierung von Organisation. München/Mering: Hampp.Google Scholar
  41. Packard, Vance O. 1957. The hidden persuaders. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
  42. Peirce, Charles S. 1976. The new elements of mathematics. The Hague: Mouton Publishers. Phillips, David. 2002. Super-themes for PR evaluation. Journal of Communication Management 6 (4), 368-386.Google Scholar
  43. Putnam, Linda L., und Michael E. Pacanowsky. 1983. Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Raupp, Juliana. 2011. Organizational communication in a networked public sphere. Studies in Communication 1: 15-36.Google Scholar
  45. Röttger, Ulrike, Joachim Preusse, und Jana Schmitt. 2011. Grundlagen der Public Relations: Eine kommunikationsWissenschaftliche Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schultze, Ulrike, und Wanda, J. Orlikowski. 2004. A practice perspective on technologymediated network relations: The use of Internet-based self-serve technologies. Information Systems Research 15(1): 87-106.Google Scholar
  47. Stacks, Don W. 2002. Primer of public relations research. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, James. R., Andrew S. Flanagin, David, R., und George Cheney. 2000. Organizational communication research: Key moments, central concerns, and future challenges. Communication Yearbook 24: 100-138.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, James R. 1999. What is “Organizational Communication”? Communication as a dialogic of text and conversation. The Communication Review 3 (1-2): 21-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, James R., und Elizabeth van Every. 2000. The emergent organization: Communication as its Site and Surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, James R., und Elizabeth van Every. 2011. The situated organization. Case studies in the pragmatics of communication research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Theis-Berglmair, Anna-Maria. 2008. Organizational communication and public relations: A conceptual framework for a common ground. In Public Relations Research: European and International Perspectives and Innovations, eds. Ansgar Zerfaß, Betteke vanRuler, und Krishnamurthy Sriramesh, 111-123. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für SozialwissenschaftenGoogle Scholar
  53. Tompkins, Phillip K. 1984. The functions of communicatin in organizations. In Handbook of rhetorical and communication theory, eds. Caroll C. Arnold, John W. Bowers, 659- 719. New York: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  54. Tompkins, Phillip K., und W. Charles Redding. 1988. Organizational Communication - past and present tenses. In Handbook of Organizational Communciation, eds. GeraldM. Goldhaber, und George A. Barnett,5-34. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Tompkins, Phillip K., und Maryanne Wanca-Th ibault. 2001. Organizational Communication: Prelude and prospects. In The new handbook of organizational communicationAdvances in theory, research, and methods, eds. Fredric M. Jablin, und Linda L. Putnam, xvii-xxxi. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Watson, Tom. 2001. Integrating planning and evaluation: evaluating the public relations practice and public relations programs. In Handbook of Public Relations, eds. Robert L Heath, und Gabriel Vasquez, 259-268. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watson, Tom. 2008. Public relations research priorities: a Delphi study. Journal of Communication Management 12(2): 104-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wehmeier, Stefan. 2009. Out of the fog and into the future: Directions of public relations, theory building, research and practice. Canadian Journal of Communication 34: 265- 282.Google Scholar
  59. Wehmeier, Stefan. 2012. Public Relations: Status und Zukunft eines Forschungsfelds. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Wehmeier, Stefan, und Peter Winkler. Forthcoming. Expanding the bridge, minimizing the gaps: Public relations, organizational communication and the idea of communication constitutes organization. Management Communication Quarterly.Google Scholar
  61. Wilson, Laurie J. 2001. Extending strategic planning to communication tactits, in Handbook of Public Relations, eds. Robert L. Heath, und Gabriel Vasquez, 215-222. Thousand Oaks, CF: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Zerfaß, Ansgar. 2010. Unternehmensführung und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit. Grundlegung einer Theorie der Unternehmenskommunikation und Public Relations. 3. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  63. Zerfass, Ansgar, Dejan Vercic, Piet Verhoeven, Angeles Moreno, und Ralph Tench. 2012. European Communication Monitor 2012. Challenges and competencies for strategic communication. Results of an empirical survey in 42 countries. Brüssel: EACD/EUPRERA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Wehmeier
    • 1
  • Lars Rademacher
    • 2
  • Ansgar Zerfaß
    • 3
  1. 1.Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität GreifswaldGreifswaldDeutschland
  2. 2.PR und KommunikationsmanagementMacromedia Hochschule für Medien und Kommunikation in MünchenMünchenDeutschland
  3. 3.Universität LeipzigLeipzigDeutschland

Personalised recommendations