The Empirical Study of Ethical Issues in Survey Participation
I first met Peter Schmidt in the late eighties or early nineties, probably in connection with a research project he was engaged in with a mutual friend, Gerda Lede- rer. Later, while on the Advisory Board of what was then called ZUMA (Zent- rum fuer Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen) at the University of Mannheim, I visited Peter in the castle in which he then lived, and still later he and some colleagues and my husband and I visited a jazz club in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Even though we have seen each other rarely, if at all, since then, we have kept in touch with each other’s work. I admire Peter not only for the elegance of his research, which applies sophisticated methodology to a wide variety of sociological problems, but also for his personal and professional integrity and his warmth as a human being.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baker, Reginald P. and Couper, Mick P. 2007, March. The Impact of Screen Size and Background Color on Response in Web Surveys. Paper presented at the General Online Research Conference (GOR’07), Leipzig, Germany.Google Scholar
- Conrad, Frederick, H. Park, Eleanor Singer, Mick P. Couper, Frost Hubbard, and Robert. M. Groves. 2006. Impact of Disclosure Risk on Survey Participation Decisions. Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, QB, May, 18–21.Google Scholar
- Couper, Mick P. and Lyberg, Lars E. 2005. The Use of Paradata in Survey Research. In Proceedings of the 55th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Sydney, Australia. [CD].Google Scholar
- Couper, Mick P., Eleanor Singer, Frederick C. Conrad, and Robert M. Groves. 2008. Risk of Disclosure, Perceptions of Risk, and Concerns about Privacy and Confidentiality as Factors in Survey Participation. 24: 255–275.Google Scholar
- Couper, Mick P., Eleanor Singer, Frederick C. Conrad, and Robert M. Groves. 2010. Experimental Studies of Disclosure Risk, Disclosure Harm, Topic Sensitivity, and Survey Participation. (2): 287–300.Google Scholar
- Department of Health and Human Services. 2009 . Code of Federal Regulations. Protection of Human Subjects. Title 45, Part 46.Google Scholar
- Porst, Rolf and Christa von Briel. 1995. Wären Sie vielleicht bereit, sich gegebenenfalls noch einmal befragen zu lassen? Oder: Gründe für die Teilnahme an Panelbefragungen. ZUMA-Arbeitsbericht, Nr. 95/04, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
- Singer, Eleanor. 2003. Exploring the Meaning of Consent: Participation in Research and Beliefs about Risks and Benefits. 19: 273–286.Google Scholar
- Singer, Eleanor. 2010. Notes toward a Cost-Benefit Theory of Survey Participation. Distinguished Lecture delivered at University of Maryland, College Park, MD March 12.Google Scholar
- Singer, Eleanor et al. 2010. The Role of Perceived Benefits and Costs in Patients’ Medical Decisions. Unpublished paper, Survey Methodology Program, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Singer, Eleanor and Mick P. Couper. 2011. Ethical Considerations in Web Surveys. In Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet, eds. Marcel Das, Peter Ester, and Lars Kaczmirek, 133–160. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J., Mick P. Couper, Eleanor Singer, Carrie A. Levin, Floyd J, Jr. Fowler, Sonja Ziniel, Peter A. Ubel, and Angela Fagerlin. 2010. The DECISIONS Study: A Nationwide Survey of United States Adults Regarding 9 Common Medical Decisions. Journal of Medical Decision Making, 30 (Supplement 1): 20 S-34 S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar