Advertisement

“The Origin of the New World”. On Elena Dorfman’s Deus (S)ex-Machina

  • Alexander Matthias GernerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Techno:Phil – Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Technikphilosophie book series (TPAHT, volume 2)

Abstract

Mechane in Aristotle designates the theater machine, which provided for illusion and the effects and dramaturgies of overpowering as in the aleatory principle of Deus ex machina.

References

  1. Alexandre, E. (2005). Elena Dorfman: Still lovers. New York: Channel Photographics.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle, Whalley, G., Baxter, J. & Atherton, P. (1997). Aristotles Poetics. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2012). Agentieller Realismus. Über die Bedeutung materiell-dsikursiver Praktiken. Aus dem Engl. Jürgen Schröder. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Bucher, T. (2018). Ifthen: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bołtuć, P. (2017). Church-Turing Lovers. In P. Linn, R. Jenkins & K. Abney (Eds.), Robot Ethics 2.0. From autonomous cars to artificial Intelligence. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 214–228Google Scholar
  6. Cheok, A.D., Kurananayaka, K. & Zhang, E.Y. (2017). Lovotics, Human-robot love and sex relationships. In P. Lin, K. Abney & R. Jenkins (Eds.), Robot ethics 2.0: From autonomous cars to artificial intelligence. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 193–213.Google Scholar
  7. Cachot, S. (2017). Elena Dorfman: The Origin of the new world. San Francisco: Modernism Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter, J. (2017). Deus Sex Machina: Loving Robot Sex Workers and the Allure of an Insincere Kiss. In J.Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.), Robot sex: Social and ethical implications. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 261–287.Google Scholar
  9. Danaher, J. & McArthur, N. (Eds.) (2017). Robot sex: Social and ethical implications. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Danaher, J., Earp, B. & Sandberg, A. (2017). Should we campaign against sex-robots? In Danaher, J. & McArthur, N. (Eds.), Robot sex: Social and ethical implications. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeBeauvoir, S. (2015). The Second Sex. London: Vintage Classics.Google Scholar
  12. Devlin, K. (2018). Turned on: The science and psychology of sex robots. London, Oxford, New York: Bloomsbury Sigma.Google Scholar
  13. Dorfman, E. (2019a). Artist Statement (still lovers). Retrieved from http://elenadorfman.com/still-lovers/artist-statement/ (last visited on 13.05.2019).
  14. Dorfman, E. (2019b). Artist Statement (The origen of the new world). Retrieved from http://elenadorfman.com/the-origin-of-the-new-world/artist-statement/ (last visited on 13.05.2019).
  15. Floridi, L. (2007). Artifiical Companions and Their Philosophical Challenges. E-mentor, May 22, http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/22/id/498.
  16. Gabriel, M. (2018). Der Sinn des Denkens. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar
  17. Grunwald, A. (2018). Der unterlegene Mensch. Die Zukunft der Menschheit im Angesicht von Algorithmen, künstlicher Intelligenz und Robotern. München: Riva.Google Scholar
  18. Kukla, R. (2018). That’s What She Said: The Language of Sexual Negotiation. Ethics 129(1), 70–97. Retrieved from https://doi:10.1086/698733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latour, B. (2017). Où atterrir? Comment s’orienter en politique. Paris: Lá Découverte.Google Scholar
  20. Levy, D. (2007). Love and sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relationships. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  21. Lintott, S. & Irvin, S. (2016). Sex Objects and Sexy Subjects. A Feminist Reclamation of Sexiness. In Sherri Irvin (Ed.) Body Aesthetics. Oxford: OUP, 299–317.Google Scholar
  22. The New York Times, Canepari, Z., Cooper, D. & Scott, E. (2015, June 11). Sex Dolls That Talk Back. Robotica Episode 5. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/12/technology/robotica-sex-robot-realdoll.html.
  23. McArthur, N. (2017). The Case for Sex Robots. In J. Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.), Robot sex: Social and ethical implications. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 31–46.Google Scholar
  24. McEwan, I. (2019), Machines like me. London: Pinguin Random House.Google Scholar
  25. McKinnon, C. (1988), Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Migotti, M. & Wyatt, N. (2017). On the Very Idea of Sex with Robots. In J. Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.), Robot sex: Social and ethical implications. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press, 15–27.Google Scholar
  27. Murphy, M. (2017, April 28). Sex robots epitomize patriarchy and offer men a solution to the threat of female independence. Retrieved from https://www.feministcurrent.com/2017/04/27/sex-robots-epitomize-patriarchy-offer-men-solution-threat-female-independence/ (last visited on 16.05.2019).
  28. Nussbaum, M. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs 24(4), 249–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orr, D. (2016, June 10). At last, a cure for feminism: Sex robots | Deborah Orr. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/10/feminism-sex-robots-women-technology-objectify (last visited on 07.05.2019).
  30. Owen, C. (1992), Posing. In Scott Bryssen et al. (Eds.), Beyond Recognition-Representation, Power and Culture. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Royakkers, L., van Est, R. (2016). Just Ordinary Robots. Automation from Love to War, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  33. Richardson, K. (2005). The Asymmetrical ‘Relationship’: Parallels Between Prostitution and the Development of Sex Robots, Research. Retrieved from https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/the-asymmetrical-relationship-parallels-between-prostitution-and-the-development-of-sex-robots/ (last visited on 07.05.2019).
  34. Richardson, K. (2017). An anthropology of robots and AI: Annihilation anxiety and machines. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Richardson, K. (2018). Challenging sociality: An anthropology of robots, autism, and attachment. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sciortino, K. (n.d.). Making The World’s First Male Sex Doll. Slutever - VICE Video: Documentaries, Films, News Videos. Retrieved from https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/male-dolls/57f41d3556a0a80f54726060 (last visited on 16.05.2019).
  37. Sherman, C. (n.d.). Cindy Sherman Interview with Therese Lichtenstein. Journal of Contemporary Art. Retrieved from http://www.jca-online.com/sherman.html (last visited on 16.05.2019).
  38. Silverman, K. (2015 [1997]), Dem Blickregime begegnen. In Andreas Reckwitz, Sophia Prinz & Hilmar Schäfer (Eds.), Ästhetik und Gesellschaft. Grundlagentexte aus Soziologie und Kulturwissenschaften. Suhrkamp: Berlin, 399–414.Google Scholar
  39. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. Vernant, J.-P. (2006). Myth and Thought among the Greeks. Trans. Janet Lloyd and Jeff Fort. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  41. Walters, M.L., Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorsten, R.T. & Koay, K.L. (2008). “Avoiding the uncanny valley: Robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion”. Autonomous Robots 24(2), 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weber, K. (2018). Autonomie und Moralität als Zuschreibung. Ethik in Mediatisierten Welten Maschinenethik, 193–208.Google Scholar
  43. Weigel, S. (2015). Grammatologie der Bilder. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Filosofia das Ciências, Departamento de História e Filosofia das CiênciasFaculdade de Ciências, Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations