Advertisement

“Wie in Verzweiflung stürzten Beide aufeinander los!” Büchner’s Lenz is Encountering a Cat

  • Roland BorgardsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Animal Studies book series (CAS, volume 4)

Abstract

There is a cat-sentence in Georg Büchner’s unfinished novella on the late 18th-century poet Jakob Michael Reinhold Lenz, first published in 1839. In the following I will focus on this single sentence.

References

  1. André, Christian Carl, ed. Der Zoologe oder Compendiöse Bibliothek des Wissenswürdigsten aus der Thiergeschichte und allgemeinen Naturkunde: Heft II–III, Eisenach/Halle, 1795.Google Scholar
  2. Bekoff, Marc, ed. Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004. 3 vols.Google Scholar
  3. Borgards, Roland. “Performing Species: Menschenpolitik und Tiertheorie im ‘Woyzeck’ (H1,1; H1,2).” Georg Büchner Jahrbuch (2013–2015), vol. 13, De Gruyter, 2016, pp. 257–274.Google Scholar
  4. Büchner, Georg. Lenz, ed. by Burghard Dedner, Marburger Ausgabe, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. Büchner, Georg. Lenz. Trans. by Richard Sieburth, Archipelago Books, 2004.Google Scholar
  6. Buffon, Count de. The Natural History of Quadrupeds. Vol. 1, Edinburgh, 1830.Google Scholar
  7. Burton, Simon, and Emily Brady. “What Is It Like to Be a Bird? Epistemic Humility and Human-Animal Relations.” Animal Ethics in the Age of Humans: Blurring Boundaries in Human-animal Relationships, ed. by Bernice Bovenkerk and Josef Keulartz, Springer, 2016, pp. 89–101.Google Scholar
  8. Castro, Eduardo Viveiros de. “Some Reflections on the Notion of Species.” Bio/Zoo, special issue of emisférica, vol. 10, no. 1, Winter 2013, www.hemisphericinstitute.org/hemi/en/e-misferica-101/viveiros-de-castro.
  9. Daston, Lorraine, and Gregg Mitman. “Introduction.” Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, ed. by Daston and Mitman, Columbia UP, 2005, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  10. De Waal, Frans. “Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial.” Philosophical Topics, vol. 27, Fall 1999, pp. 255–280.Google Scholar
  11. De Waal, Frans. The Ape and the Sushi Master: Reflections of a Primatologist. Basic Books, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. De Waal, Frans. Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are? Granta Books, 2016.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, Jaques. “The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow).” Trans. by David Willis. Critical Inquiry, vol. 28, no. 2, 2002, pp. 369–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Derrida, Jaques. The Beast and the Sovereign. Vol. 1, ed. by Michel Lisse et al., trans. by Geoffrey Bennington, U of Chicago P, 2009.Google Scholar
  15. Derrida, Jaques. The Beast and the Sovereign. Vol. 2, ed. by Michel Lisse et al., trans. by Geoffrey Bennington, U of Chicago P, 2011.Google Scholar
  16. Descola, Philippe. The Ecology of Others, trans. by Geneviève Godbout and Benjamin P. Luley, Prickly Paradigm P, 2013.Google Scholar
  17. Driscoll, Kári. “An Unheard, Inhuman Music: Narrative Voice and the Question of the Animal in Kafka’s ‘Josephine, the Singer or the Mouse Folk’.” Humanities, vol. 6, no. 2, 3 May 2017, pp. 1–26. MDPI, http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/6/2/26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Francione, Gary L. Animals as Persons: Essays on the Abolition of Animal Exploitation. Columbia UP, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Glasgow, Rupert. The Minimal Self. Würzburg UP, 2017.Google Scholar
  20. Gruen, Lori. Entangled Empathy: An Alternative Ethic for Our Relations with Animals. Lantern Books, 2015.Google Scholar
  21. Güntürkün, Onur, et al. “Cognition without Cortex.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 20, no. 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 291–303.Google Scholar
  22. Haraway, Donna J. When Species Meet. U of Minnesota P, 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Hargrove, Eugene C. “Weak Anthropocentric Value.” The Intrinsic Value of Nature, special issue of The Monist, vol. 75, no. 2, Apr. 1992, pp. 183–207.Google Scholar
  24. Heisenberg, Martin. “Outcome learning, outcome expectations, and intentionality in Drosophila.” Learning Memory, vol. 22, 2015, pp. 294–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Höller, Thomas. “Das Tier in Uns—Das Wir im Tier: Verwendungsarten des Anthropomorphismus.” Das Tier in unserer Kultur: Begegnungen, Beziehungen, Probleme, ed. by Hans Werner Ingensiep, Oldib, 2015, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar
  26. Kaminski, Nicola. “Herzbruder? ‘Lenzens Verrückung’ über die Jahrhundertschwelle.” Das achtzehnte Jahrhundert, vol. 28, no. 1, 2004, pp. 46–64.Google Scholar
  27. Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Harvard UP, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. Lockwood, Randall. “Anthropomorphism is Not a Four-Letter Word.” Perceptions of Animals in American Culture, ed. by Robert J. Hoage, Smithsonian Institution P, 1989, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
  29. McHugh, Susan. “Animal Farm’s Lessons for Literary (and) Animal Studies.” Humanimalia: A journal of human/animal interface studies, vol. 1, no. 1, Sep. 2009. DePauw, www.depauw.edu/humanimalia/issue01/pdfs/Susan%20McHugh.pdf/.
  30. Michels, Gerd. “Landschaft in Georg Büchners ‘Lenz’.” Textanalyse und Textverstehen. Quelle & Meyer, 1981, pp. 12–33.Google Scholar
  31. Morgan, Lloyd C. “Other Minds than Ours.” An Introduction to Comparative Psychology, by Morgan, Walter Scott Publishing, 1903, pp. 36–59.Google Scholar
  32. Oken, Lorenz. Allgemeine Naturgeschichte für alle Stände: Vol. VII/3: Säugethiere 2. Stuttgart, 1838.Google Scholar
  33. Schmidt, Harald. Melancholie und Landschaft: Die psychotische und ästhetische Struktur der Naturschilderungen in Georg Büchners ‘Lenz’. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1994.Google Scholar
  34. Sommer, Volker. “Kultur in der Natur: Wie Tiere Traditionen pflegen.” Das Plateau, vol. 102, Aug. 2007, pp. 5–26.Google Scholar
  35. Steiner, Gary. Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents: The Moral Status of Animals in Western Philosophy. U of Pittsburgh P, 2005.Google Scholar
  36. Steiner, Gary, “Anthropozentrismus”. Lexikon der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung, ed. by Arianna Ferrari and Klaus Petrus, transcript, 2015, pp. 28–31.Google Scholar
  37. Thompson, Allen. “Anthropocentrism: Humanity as Peril and Promise.” The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, ed. by Stephen M. Gardiner and Thompson, Oxford UP 2017, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar
  38. Tinbergen, Niko. “On Aims and Methods of Ethology.” Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, vol. 20, 1963, pp. 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tyler, Tom. Ciferae: A Bestiary in Five Fingers. U of Minnesota P, 2012.Google Scholar
  40. Urquiza-Haas, Esmeralda G. M., and Kurt Kotrschal. “The Mind behind Anthropomorphic Thinking: Attribution of Mental States to Other Species.” Animal Behaviour, vol. 109, Nov. 2015, pp. 167–176.Google Scholar
  41. Voigt, Friedrich Siegmund. Lehrbuch der Zoologie. Vol I, Stuttgart, 1834.Google Scholar
  42. Weber, Carl Julius. Dymocritos oder hinterlassene Papiere eines lachenden Philosophen. Vol. VI, Stuttgart, 1836.Google Scholar
  43. Whiten, Andrew, et al. “Cultures in chimpanzees.” Nature, vol. 399, 10 June 1999, pp. 682–685.Google Scholar
  44. Wild, Markus. Die anthropologische Differenz: Der Geist der Tiere in der frühen Neuzeit bei Montaigne, Descartes und Hume. De Gruyter, 2006.Google Scholar
  45. Wild, Markus. “Anthropomorphismus.” Lexikon der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung, ed. by Arianna Ferrari and Klaus Petrus, transcript, 2015, pp. 26–28.Google Scholar
  46. Wild, Markus. “Im Reich der wilden Tiere: Ergänzungen, Repliken, Revisionen zur Tierphilosophie.” Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik, vol. 23, no. 1, 2012, pp. 108–131.Google Scholar
  47. Wild, Markus. Tierphilosophie zur Einführung. Junius, 2010.Google Scholar
  48. Wolfe, Cary. “Animal Studies: Disciplinarity, and the (Post)Humanities.” What Is Posthumanism?, by Wolfe, U of Minnesota P, 2010, pp. 99–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Frankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations