Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kontextualistische Wissens­theorien

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie

  • 5511 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Annis, David: A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification. In: American Philosophical Quarterly 15/3 (1978), 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, Peter: Contextualism and the Factivity Problem. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76/3 (2008), 580–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blome-Tillmann, Michael: Knowledge & Presuppositions. Oxford 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brendel, Elke: Why Contextualists Cannot Know They Are Right. Self-refuting Implications of Contextualism. In: Acta Analytica 20 (2005), 38–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Jessica: Contextualism and Warranted Assertibility Manoeuvres. In: Philosophical Studies 130 (2006), 407–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Stewart: How to be a Fallibilist. In: Philosophical Perspectives 2 (1988), 91–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Stewart: Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reason. In: Noûs 33 (1999), 57–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRose, Keith: Contextualism and Knowledge Attribution. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52/4 (1992), 913–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRose, Keith: Solving the Skeptical Problem. In: The Philosophical Review 104/1 (1995), 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRose, Keith: The Case for Contextualism. Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Bd. 1. Oxford 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRose, Keith: The Appearance of Ignorance. Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Bd. 2. Oxford 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinges, Alexander: Epistemic Contextualism Can Be Stated Properly. In: Synthese 191 (2014), 3541–3556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, Fred: Epistemic Operators. In: The Journal of Philosophy 67/24 (1970), 1007–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantl, Jeremy/McGrath, Matthew: Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, Wolfgang: Epistemic Contextualism and the Knowability Problem. In: Acta Analytica 26 (2011), 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, John: Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, David: Demonstratives. An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals. In: Almog, Joseph/Perry, John/Wettstein, Howard (Hg.): Themes From Kaplan. Oxford 1989, 481–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, Joshua/Nichols, Shaun: Experimental Philosophy. In: Zalta, Edward N. (Hg.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/experimental-philosophy/.

  • Kompa, Nikola: The Context Sensitivity of Knowledge Ascriptions. In: Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (2002), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: Scorekeeping in a Language Game. In: Journal of Philosophical Logic 8/3 (1979), 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: Elusive Knowledge. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74/4 (1996), 549–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane, John: Assessment Sensitivity. Oxford 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert: Philosophical Explanations. Harvard 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rysiew, Patrick: The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions. In: Noûs 35 (2001), 477–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, Ernest: Skepticism and Contextualism. In: Philosophical Issues 10 (2000), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jason: Knowledge and Practical Interest. Oxford 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stei, Erik: Die Bedeutung von ›wissen‹. Eine Untersuchung zur Kontextabhängigkeit von Wissensaussagen. Mentis 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael: Unnatural Doubts. Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Skepticism. Cambridge, Mass. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Timothy: Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bonn, Deutschland

    Erik Stei

Authors
  1. Erik Stei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Stei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Philosophie, TU Dresden Institut für Philosophie, Dresden, Germany

    Martin Grajner

  2. Department of Philosophy, University of Graz Department of Philosophy, Graz, Austria

    Guido Melchior

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stei, E. (2019). Kontextualistische Wissens­theorien. In: Grajner, M., Melchior, G. (eds) Handbuch Erkenntnistheorie. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04632-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04632-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04631-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04632-1

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation