Airfoil Tests with and without Control (Task 3)

  • Egon Stanewsky
  • Jean Délery
  • John Fulker
  • Wolfgang Geißler
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics (NNFM) book series (NONUFM, volume 56)

Abstract

The aims of the present studies were to investigate, experimentally, the effect of passive control of shock boundary layer interactions on the design and off-design performance of airfoils. The investigation concentrated on airfoils designed to achieve large extents of natural laminar flow on both surfaces, since airfoils of this kind have a larger potential for improvement at design conditions, where shock waves are probably already present, and, in addition, have smaller margins as far as drag-rise and buffet boundaries are concerned when compared to turbulent designs. During the course of the investigation, having perused early results, it was agreed that DLR would retest the original airfoil VA-2 which had demonstrated the benefits of passive control [1.3].

Keywords

Reynolds Number Mach Number Wind Tunnel Lift Coefficient Viscous Drag 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [4.1]
    Dargel,G., and Thiede, P., “Passive Shock Control Investigation on Airfoils. Part I: Numerical Flow Simulation, Part II: Model Design and Manufacture”, DASA-Airbus final report EUROSHOCK TR AER2-92-49/2.7 and DA Report No. EF 06 / 2.7, February 1996 (also see Chapter 19).Google Scholar
  2. [4.2]
    Rosemann, H., Knauer, A. and Stanewsky, E., “Experimental Investigation of the Transonic Airfoils DA LVA-1A and VA-2 with Shock Control”, DLR final report EUROSHOCK TR AER2-92-49/3.5, 1996 and DLR IB 223-96 A 02, 1996 (also see Chapter 21).Google Scholar
  3. [4.3]
    Archambaud, J.P. and Rodde, A.M., “Qualification by Laser Measurement of the Passive Control on the LVA-lA Airfoil in the T2 Wind Tunnel”, ONERA final report EUROSHOCK TR AER2-92- 49 /3. 4, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. [4.4]
    Fulker, J. L. and Simmons, M. J., “An experimental investigation of passive shock/boundary-layer interaction control on an aerofoil”, DRA final report EUROSHOCK TR AER2-92-49/3.2, 1995 and DRA/HWA/CR95216/1, 1995 (also see Chapter 22).Google Scholar
  5. [4.5]
    Wagner, W., “An experimental investigation of passive shock boundary law interaction control on an aerofoil: unsteady pressures”, DLR final report EUROSHOCK TR AER2-92-49/3.3, 1996 (also see Chapter 23).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Egon Stanewsky
  • Jean Délery
  • John Fulker
  • Wolfgang Geißler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations