Walking the Bottom Line: Programming Cultures and Television Economics in Contemporary Britain

  • Graham Murdock

Abstract

Before breathalysers introduced a degree of chemical calibration to the measurement of inebriation, people arrested on suspicion of being ‘over the limit’ would be taken to the local police station and asked to walk a white line painted on the floor. If they managed not to deviate or stumble, they were free to go. If they veered off in eccentric directions they were charged. Over the last decade an increasing number of programme makers working in British television have come to feel like suspected drunks, forced to walk an increasingly narrow line — a bottom line — drawn by administrators responsible for costs and revenues. As Lawrence Marks and Maurice Gran, two of the country’s most successful scriptwriters recently complained:

„The power the creative staff once had has been usurped by legions of lawyers, accountants, business-affairs executives... They apply to the production of television the same discipline they would apply to the production of biscuits” (Marks and Gran 1997, p. 23).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, Kamal (1997a): „What a jolly jape — the Malory gels are being updated“, in: The Guardian, 14 October, p. 5.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Kamal (1997b): „Bibs and tuckers banned on new ‘casual’ BBC TV channel“, in: The Guardian, 7 November, p. 7.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, Kamal (1997c): „Doyen attacks ‘poison’ in TV industry“, in: The Guardian, 21 November, p. 2.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, Matt (1997): „In the money“, in: Broadcast, 11 July, p. 15.Google Scholar
  5. Beavis, Simon (1998): „ITV stations hit out at Channel 4’s ‘populism’”, in: The Guardian, 30 January, p. 14.Google Scholar
  6. Bottomley, Virginia (1996): „An act of faith”, in: Broadcast, 19 July, p. 21.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, Maggie (1997): „Pearson tries to make money from old soap”, in: The Guardian, 9 October, p. 24.Google Scholar
  8. Cable Authority (1986): Annual Report and Accounts, London.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, Steve (1998): „Pop goes the fizz”, in: The Media Guardian, 19 January, pp. 8-9.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, Richard (1996): „ITV: the network that cares about share”, in: Television Business International, November, pp. 36-38.Google Scholar
  11. Cuff, Andrew (1997): „’second-best’ wins digital TV fight”, in: The Guardian Weekly, 6 July, p. 11.Google Scholar
  12. Duncan, Andrew (1987): „The British and the box: three quiz shows”, in: The Observer Magazine, 22 February, pp. 24-28.Google Scholar
  13. Franklin, Carl (1997): „A new view of old TV favourites”, in: Broadcast, 7 February, pp. 18-19.Google Scholar
  14. Hargreaves, Ian and Laura Cumming (1997): „Interview: David Elstein”, in: New Statesman and Society, 21 March, pp. 40-41.Google Scholar
  15. Hart, Martin (1996): „Cracking the code”, in: Spectrum, Issue 23, Autumn, pp. 10-11.Google Scholar
  16. Hellen, Nicholas (1989): „Time to celebrate the independents’ day?”, in: Marketing Week, 24 February, pp. 69-73.Google Scholar
  17. Home Office (1986): Report of the Committee on Financing the BBC, London, HMSO (Cmnd 9824).Google Scholar
  18. Isaacs, Jeremy (1989): Storm over 4: A Personal Account, London.Google Scholar
  19. Marks, Lawrence and Maurice Gran (1997): „Comedy of errors blights television”, in: The Guardian, 23 August, p. 23.Google Scholar
  20. Murdock, Graham (1992): „Embedded persuasions; the fall and rise of integrated advertising”, in: Strinati, Dominic and Stephen Wagg (eds.), Come on Down? Popular Media Culture in Post-War Britain, London, pp. 202-231.Google Scholar
  21. Murdock, Graham (1993): „Authorship and Organisation”, in: Alvarado, Manuel et al. (eds.), The Screen Education Reader: Cinema, Television, Culture, Basingstoke, pp. 123-143.Google Scholar
  22. Murdock, Graham (1994a): „Money Talks: Broadcasting Finance and Public Culture” in: Hood, Stuart (ed.), Behind the Screens: The Structure of British Television in the Nineties, London, pp. 155-183.Google Scholar
  23. Murdock, Graham (1994b): „Corporate dynamics and broadcasting futures”, in: Aldridge, Meryl and Nicholas Hewitt (eds.), Controlling Broadcasting, Manchester, pp. 4-19.Google Scholar
  24. National Heritage Committee (1993): The Future of the BBC. Volume 1: Report and Minutes of Proceedings House of Commons Session 1993-4, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  25. Potter, Dennis (1993): „Occupying Powers”, in: The Guardian, 28 August, p. 21.Google Scholar
  26. Reith, John (1924): Broadcast Over Britain, London.Google Scholar
  27. Scott, Robin (1980): „Public broadcasting: the changing media scene”, in: Intermedia, Volume 8, Number 6, p. 17.Google Scholar
  28. Television Business International (1997): „The BBC: Producer Choices”, April, pp. 40-42.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, Richard (1997): „Telly without the vision”, in: The Media Guardian, 25 August, p. 7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen/Wiesbaden 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Murdock
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Sociology of CultureLoughborough UniversityGreat Britain
  2. 2.University of BergenNorway

Personalised recommendations