A Two Grid Method for Coupling Fem and Bem in Elasticity

  • Karsten Türke
  • Eckart Schnack
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics (NNFM) book series (NONUFM, volume 50)

Summary

This paper presents a coupling algorithm of FEM and BEM for solving mixed boundary value problems in elastostatics. A domain decomposition of the bounded domain Ω leads to a basic substructure Ω1 with a skeleton H, where the FEM is applied, and several macroelements Ωi (i = 2,…, p), where the BEM is used on a fine grid h.

As fundamental equations the well known energy bilinear form is used for the whole domain Ω and, additionally, a second bilinear form on the macroelements Ωi as a coupling condition. This way a symmetric and nonconforming (i.e. different, independent grids H and h) coupling algorithm can be obtained. This can be realized by applying the Poincaré-Steklov operator on the macroelement surfaces in the strong singular form and by avoiding the use of the hypersingular boundary integral equation.

The construction of a robust and reliable numerical algorithm depends on the adaptive control of symmetry and definiteness of the coupling matrix. Therefore we use an iterative method for solving the boundary integral equation by expanding the Calderon projector in a Neumann series. Finally the convergence of this expansion is proved, on the basis of the fundamental work of Kupradze et.al. [13].

Numerical results in 2D and 3D will show the preciseness and efficiency of the method.

Keywords

Boundary Element Method Coarse Grid Domain Decomposition Boundary Integral Equation Fine Grid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Schnack, E.: “Beitrag zur Berechnung rotationssymmetrischer Spannungskonzentrationsprobleme mit der Methode der Finiten Elemente”, Doctoral Thesis, Technical University of Munich, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Tong, P., T.H.H. Pian and S.J. Lasry: “A hybrid element approach to crack problems in plane elasticity”, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 7, 1973, pp. 297–308.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Schnack, E.: “Stress Analysis with a Combination of HSM and BEM”, Proceedings of the MAFELAP 1984 Conference on “The Mathematics of Finite Elements and Applications”, Academic Press 1985, pp. 273–281.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Schnack, E.: “A Hybrid BEM-Model”, Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng., 24, No. 5 (1987), pp. 1015–1025.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Schnack, E.: “Macro-Elements for 2D- and 3D-Elasticity with BEM”, Boundary Elements XII, Vol. I. Eds: M. Tanaka, C.A. Brebbia, T. Honma, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 1990, pp. 21–31.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Carmine, R.: “Ein Kopplungsverfahren von FEM und BEM zur Berechnung ebener Spannungskonzentrationsprobleme”, Doctoral Thesis, Karlsruhe University, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Karaosmanoglu, N.: “Kopplung von Randelement-und Finite-Element-Verfahren für dreidimensionale elastische Strukturen”, Doctoral Thesis, Karlsruhe University, 1989.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Costabel M. and W.L. Wendland: “Strong ellipticity of boundary integral operators”. Krelles Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik 372 (1986), pp. 34–63.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Türke K.: “Eine Zweigitter-Methode zur Kopplung von FEM and BEM”, Doctoral Thesis, University of Karlsruhe (1995).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hsiao G.C., E. Schnack, W.L. Wendland: “A hybrid coupled finite-boundary element method”, Technical Report 95–11, Mathematisches Institut A, Universität Stuttgart, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Rieder G.: “Iterationsverfahren und Operatorgleichungen in der Elastizitätstheorie”, Abhandlungen der Braunschweigischen Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft, Band XIV, Fried. Vieweg & Sohn Verlag, Braunschweig, (1962).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Taylor A.E.: “Introduction to functional analysis”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney, 1958.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kupradze V.D., T.G. Gegelia, M.O. Basheleishvili, T.V. Burchuladze: “Three dimensional problems of the mathematical theory of elasticity and thermoelasticity”, North-Holland Series in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 25, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Haack W., W. Wendland: “Vorlesungen über Partielle und Pfaffsche Differentialgleichungen”, Birkhäuser Verlag Basel und Stuttgart (1969).MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Schnack E.: “Kopplung von Finite-Element- und Randelementmethoden für dreidimensionale elastische Strukturen”, Report of the German Research Foundation (DFG), Project Schn 245/10–1, Karlsruhe University, 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© yen 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karsten Türke
    • 1
  • Eckart Schnack
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Solid MechanicsUniversity of Karlsruhe (TH)KarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations