Advertisement

Science Museums: Reflections from an Autobiographical Journey

  • Ana Maria Navas IanniniEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 17)

Abstract

In this chapter, I use the currere process of reflexive inquiry (PinarWF, AnnMeetAmEducResAssoc2:19–27, 1975), as a personal experience method (Grumet MR, JTeachEduc40:13–17, 1989) to map my intellectual interests about science museums and make meaning of them. Moving through the four moments of inquiry that Pinar describes − regressive, progressive, analytical, and synthetic −, I start with a turn to my autobiographical past, looking closely at undergraduate, graduate and professional experiences that first opened a space for me to combine science and education, and then, to approach (and question) the work of science museums. Places, people, feeling and emotions emerged as part of this reconstruction. In taking distance of the past, I move within the other moments of inquiry. I look at the positions that ground my current doctoral research with museum exhibits that disrupt dominant cultural narratives and prevailing models of science communication. As part of this process, I reflect on the ways I have strengthened and refined my epistemological beliefs and my understandings about the challenges and possibilities to envision (and to advocate for) science museums as places for promoting social change. While identifying relations between intellectual interests and biographical movement, I explore potential angles for future research and, also, possibilities for combining theory and practice.

Resumen

En este trajo utilizo currere, el proceso de investigación reflexiva (PinarWF, Ann Meet Am Educ Res Assoc 2:19–27, 1975), como un método de experiencia personal (Grumet MR, J Teach Educ 40:13–17, 1989) para mapear mis intereses intelectuales sobre museos de ciencia y construir sentido en relación a ellos. Navegando los cuatro momentos que Pinar (Ann Meet Am Educ Res Assoc 2:19–27, 1975) describe – regresivo, progresivo, analítico y sintético −, comienzo con el regreso a mi pasado autobiográfico, enfocando en las experiencias de pregrado y posgrado que por primera vez abrieron un espacio para articular educación y ciencias y, posteriormente, para abordar (y cuestionar) el trabajo de museos de ciencias. Lugares, personas, sentimientos y emociones emergen como parte de esta reconstrucción. Distanciándome del pasado, me muevo por los otros momentos de investigación. Observo las posiciones que sustentan mi actual investigación de doctorado que se enfoca en exposiciones de museos que desafían narrativas culturales dominantes y modelos prevalentes de comunicación de la ciencia. Como parte de este proceso, reflexiono sobre las formas en que he fortalecido y refinado mis creencias epistemológicas y mi compresión sobre los desafíos y posibilidades de visualizar (y abogar por) museos de ciencias como espacios para producir transformación social. Mientras identifico las relaciones entre intereses intelectuales y movimiento biográfico, exploro el potencial de nuevos ángulos de investigación y también, la articulación entre teoría y práctica.

Keywords

Currere Autobiography Science museums Science education 

References

  1. Beierling, S., Buitenhuis, E., Grant, K., & Hanson, A. (2014). “Course” work: Pinar’s currere as an initiation into curriculum studies. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 5(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, L. (2008). Engaging the public in technology policy. A new role for science museums? Science Communication, 29(3), 386–398.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007311971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bickmore, K. (2014). CTL1000: Foundations of curriculum studies. [Class handout]. Curriculum Studies & Teacher Development Program, CTL Department, OISE,University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, D. (1971/2004). The museum, a temple or the forum. In G. Anderson (Ed.),Reinventing the museum: Historical and contemporary perspectives on the paradigm shift (pp. 61–73). New York: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, E. (2014). Equity in informal science education: Developing an access and equity framework for science museums and science centres. Studies in Science Education, 50(2), 209–247.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.957558. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Einsiedel, A. A., & Einsiedel, E. F. (2004). Museums as agora: Diversifying approaches to engaging publics in research. In D. Chittenden, G. Farmelo, & B. V. Lewenstein (Eds.), Creating connections: Museums and the public understanding of current research (pp. 73–86). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eslinger, J. (2014). “Don’t you know only white kids like science?”: Currere as critical autobiography. Canadian Journal of New Scholars in Education, 5(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  8. Grumet, M. R. (1989). Generations: Reconceptualist curriculum theory and teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, Jan-Feb, 40(1), 13–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718904000104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hodson, D. (2013). Don’t be nervous, don’t be flustered, don’t be scared. Be prepared. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 13(4), 313–331.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.845327. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanu, Y., & Glor, M. (2006). Currere to the rescue? Teachers as amateur intellectuals in a knowledge society. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 4(2), 101–121.Google Scholar
  11. Navas Iannini, A. M., & Pedretti, E. (2017). Preventing youth pregnancy: Dialogue and deliberation in a science museum exhibit. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(4), 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nicholson-Goodman, J. V. (2012). Mapping the doctoral journey via autobiographical consciousness: Locating self and finding voice in the academy. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 28(1), 242–259.Google Scholar
  13. Pedretti, E. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centres and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pinar, W. F. (1975). The method of “Currere.”. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2(1975), 19–27.Google Scholar
  15. Pinar, W. (1981). “Whole, bright, deep with understanding”: Issues in qualitative research and autobiographical method. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13(3), 173–188.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027810130302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rahm, J. (2012). Diverse urban youth’s learning of science outside school in university outreach and community science programs. In F. et al. (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 47–58). Dordrecht: Springer International Handbooks of Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations