Stories of Hope

  • Ralph LevinsonEmail author
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 17)


This is a narrative account, reflected from the author’s perspective, of three teachers’ resistance to the formulation of metrication and fabrication arising from the influence of STEM in science education. It focuses on the ways transformative science teaching challenges this obstacle viewed through the lens of Critical Realism and how social justice is meshed into science pedagogy.


Pedagogy Transformative STEM education 


  1. Ball, S. J. (2013). The education debate (2nd ed.). Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bhaskar, R. (2002). From science to emancipation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61(3), 279–311. Scholar
  4. Gough, A. (2015). STEM policy and science education: scientistic curriculum and socio-political silences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 445–458. Scholar
  5. Hargreaves, A. (2010). Presentism, individualism, and conservatism: The legacy of Dan Lortie’s schoolteacher: A sociological study. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 143–154. Scholar
  6. Levinson, R., & Martins, I. (2012). Political literacy as a component of science teacher training: opportunities and challenges for practise. London: International Partnership & Mobility Scheme – The British Academy.Google Scholar
  7. Mayo, P. (2008). Antonio Gramsci and his relevance for the education of adults. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(3), 418–435. Scholar
  8. Simon, R. (1992). Teaching against the grain: texts for a pedagogy of possibility. New York: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  9. Williams, F. (2015, July 23). Ormond Uren obituary. The Guardian. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations