Advertisement

Finding a Critical Voice

  • Aswathy Raveendran
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 17)

Abstract

In this chapter I attempt to narrate my experiences of my journey into the exciting and nebulous new terrain of critical science education in India, starting out as an “insider” conducting research within the field of biological sciences. I will focus on specific personal and educational experiences that have motivated me to make the shift, on the challenges that I encountered as a “science educator critical of science,” and on my engagement with the difficult questions that seek the “implications” of my PhD work in a climate that is politically reactionary.

Keywords

Values Feminist science studies Socioscientific issues Social justice 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Jesse Bazzul for making this chapter possible and for his critical engagement with my writing. I also thank Ralph Levinson for his constructive feedback.

References

  1. Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: An educational perspective. Science & Education, 8, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0730-6_13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carter, L. (2008). Globalization and science education: The implications of science in the new economy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 617–633.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chadha, G. (2005). Towards an informed science criticism: The debate on science in postcolonial India. In K. Ganesh & U. Thakkar (Eds.), Culture and the making of identity in contemporary India. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  6. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Levinson, R. (2013). Practice and theory of socio-scientific issues: An authentic model? Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 99–116.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.746819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Longino, H. E. (1987). Can there be a feminist science? Hypatia, 2(3), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nanda, M. (1997). Against social de (con) struction of science: Cautionary tales from the third world. Monthly Review, 48(10), 1.  https://doi.org/10.14452/mr-048-10-1997-03_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Delusions about evidence: On why scientific evidence should not be the main concern in socioscientific decision making. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 13(4), 373–385.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.845323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manorama, S., & Shah, C. (1996). Towards a new perspective on women’s bodies: Learning and unlearning together. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(16–17), 35–38.Google Scholar
  13. Ranganathan, S. (2014). The rationalist movement against quack healing: Critical questions. Economic & Political Weekly, 24(1), 13–15.Google Scholar
  14. Raveendran, A., & Chunawala, S. (2013). Towards an understanding of socioscientific issues as means to achieve critical scientific literacy. In G. Nagarjuna, A. Jamakhandi, E. Sam (Eds.), epiSTEME 5 international conference to review research on science, technology and mathematics education, conference proceedings. Cinnamonteal, India, pp. 67–73. Retrieved from http://episteme.hbcse.tifr.res.in/index.php/episteme5/5/paper/view/130/13
  15. Raveendran, A., & Chunawala, S. (2015a). Reproducing values: A feminist critique of reproductive health in the higher secondary biology textbook. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 22(2), 194–218.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521515578244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raveendran, A., & Chunawala, S. (2015b). Values in science: Making sense of biology doctoral students’ critical examination of a deterministic claim in a media article. Science Education, 99(4), 669–695.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review ofresearch. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shah, C. (2012). From numbers to structures: Navigating the complex terrains of science, education and feminism. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 9(2), 145–171.  https://doi.org/10.1177/097318491200900202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shah, C., & Chadha, G. (2011). Teaching feminist science studies in India: An experiment. In S. Chunawala & M. Kharatmal (Eds.), Proceedings of epiSTEME 4 – International conference to review research on science, technology and mathematics education (pp. 144–149). India: Macmillan http://episteme4.hbcse.tifr.res.in/proceedings/strand-i-historical-philosophical-and-socio-cultural-studies-of-stm-implications-for-education/shah-and-chadha.Google Scholar
  20. Varughese, S. S. (2012). Where are the missing masses? The quasi-publics and non-publics of technoscience. Minerva, 50(2), 239–254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9197-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aswathy Raveendran
    • 1
  1. 1.BITS Pilani, Hyderabad CampusTIFRMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations