Advertisement

Learning About Matter and the Material, Struggling with Entanglement and Staying with the Trouble to Raise Up Feminist Science Education

  • Kathryn ScantleburyEmail author
  • Anita Hussenius
  • Jenny Ivarsson
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 17)

Abstract

In this chapter we use metalogue to share and discuss our experiences as feminist science educators using our voices to critique science education, especially its power structures, and each other’s thinking while remaining true to an ethic of care that adheres to feminist principles. Kate’s feminist pathway began as a secondary school student in Australia. Anita’s feminist awakening occurred through her leadership experiences as head of a chemistry department, which contributed to a major shift in her research interests toward gender and feminist perspectives on science and science education. Jenny is a particle physicist, after she began teaching physics at a Swedish university she reflected on how to make physics more accessible to all learners, especially girls. We explore how posthumanistic theories, such as material feminism can offer new insights into identifying, challenging and dismantling power structures within science education and science.

Keywords

Material feminisqm Equity Gender Baradian theory 

References

  1. Ah-King, M. (Ed.). (2013). Challenging popular myths of sex, gender and biology. Crossroads: Center for Gender Research, Uppsala University, Springer Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01979-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.  https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohr, N. (1963). The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr. Vol. 2. Essays, 1933–1957, On atomic physics and human knowledge. Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.Google Scholar
  6. Haraway, D. (2010). When species meet: Staying with the trouble. Environment and Planning D, 28(1), 53–55.  https://doi.org/10.1068/d2706wsh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasse, C. (2015). An anthropology of learning: On nested frictions in cultural ecologies. Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9606-4 10.1007/978-94-017-9606-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hill Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hussénius, A. (2017). Forming bonds – breaking bonds. In L. Bryan & K. Tobin (Eds.), 13 questions for science education. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Ivarsson, J. (2016). Agentisk realism, en genusvetenskaplig formulering av kvantfysikens lagar. TGV, 37(3), 96–113.Google Scholar
  11. Matsuda, M. (1991). Beside my sister, facing the enemy: Legal theory out of coalition. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1183–1192.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1229035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McLennan, D. A. (2000). The macroevolutionary diversification of female and male components of the stickleback breeding system. Behaviour, 137(7), 1029–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156853900502411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pettersson, H. (2011). Making masculinity in plasma physics: Machines, labour and experiments. Science Studies, 1, 47–65.Google Scholar
  14. Rich, A. (1979). On lies, secrets and silence: Selected prose, 1966–1978. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Scantlebury, K. (2014). Gender matters: Building on the past, recognizing the present, and looking towards the future. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 187–203). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Schein, E. (2006). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Wolff, V. (1991). A room of one’s own. New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Scantlebury
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anita Hussenius
    • 2
  • Jenny Ivarsson
    • 3
  1. 1.University of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  3. 3.Department of Natural SciencesBessemerskolanSandvikenSweden

Personalised recommendations