Advertisement

Engaging in Research Practices as Critical Scholars/Activists: A Metalogue

  • Alexandra SchindelEmail author
  • Sara Tolbert
  • Alberto J. Rodriguez
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 17)

Abstract

In this chapter, we use a metalogue format to discuss the possibilities of engaging in activist oriented scholarship as critically engaged scholar/activists. We draw upon our experiences to think about what this type of engagement means both on personal and individualized levels as well as in the broader context of being/becoming activists and critical scholars within a field – science education – that has little history of supporting this type of work. Each of us has chosen to engage with activism as a methodological and theoretical approach to working within and for schools as science educators. We will narrow our focus in this chapter to consider and creatively re/imagine the following research practices: (1) Positionality: What are our own social, political, and gendered/classed/racialized roles as we conduct research within economically oppressed communities?; (2) Public: What are our responsibilities to the communities in which we work and to the broader public?; and (3) Rigor: How do we (re)define rigor as a measure of transformative impact with the communities with whom we research? This metalogue will contribute to critical perspectives on research and research relationships in science education.

Keywords

Critical research Research practices Positionality Rigor 

References

  1. Anyon, J. (2009). Theory and educational research: Toward critical social explanation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bazzul, J., Tolbert, S., & Kayumova, S. (in press). New materialisms and science classrooms: Diagramming ontologies and critical assemblies. In K. Scantlebury & C. Milne (Eds.), Material practice and materiality: Too long ignored in science education. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Marvel Comics. (1962). Amazing Fantasy #15.Google Scholar
  4. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). Busting open the meritocracy myth: Rethinking equity and student achievement in science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4(2&3), 195–216.  https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v4.i2-3.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rodriguez, A. J. (2004). Turning despondency into hope: Charting new paths to improve students’ achievement and participation in science education. Tallahassee: Southeast Eisenhower Regional Consortium.Google Scholar
  7. Rodriguez, A. J. (2015). Managing institutional and social challenges through sociotransformative constructivism: A longitudinal case study of a high school science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 448–460.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rodriguez, A. J. (2016). For whom do we do equity and social justice work? Recasting the discourse about the other to effect transformative change. In N. M. Joseph, C. Haynes, & F. Cobb (Eds.), Interrogating whiteness and relinquishing power: White faculty’s commitment to racial consciousness in STEM education. New York: Peter Lang.  https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1716-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schlesinger, S., & Kinzer, S. (1999). Bitter fruit: The story of the American coup in Guatemala (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Stacey, J. (1991). Can there be a feminist ethnography? In S. B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 111–119). New York: Routledge.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ohr/20.1.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tolbert, S., Schindel, A., Rodriguez, A. J. (2018). Relevance and relational responsibility in justice-oriented science education research. Science Education, 102(4), 796–819.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). R words: Refusing research. In D. Paris & M. Winn (Eds.), Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities (pp. 223–248). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. West, C. (2009). Brother west: Living and loving out loud, a memoir. New York: SmileyBooks.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Schindel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sara Tolbert
    • 2
  • Alberto J. Rodriguez
    • 3
  1. 1.University at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Purdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations