In the Middle of Treaty Walking: Entangling Truth, Ethics, and the Risky Narratives of Two Settler(colonial)s

  • Audrey AamodtEmail author
  • Jesse Bazzul
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 17)


In this metalogue chapter we dive into the middle of the places we find ourselves teaching and living in the context of Truth and Reconciliation (in Canada). We ask the reader to join us on our “Treaty Walk”, where we (re)consider our ethical relationship to self, other, and the world as white settlers through dreams, stories, and dialogue. We also take along with us Michel Foucault’s concept of Parrhesia (Foucault, M., Davidson, A. I., Burchell, G. (2012). The courage of truth: the government of self and others II; Lectures at the Collège de France, 1983–1984. New York: Macmillan) on our journey into subjectivity. The goal of our messy narrative is to challenge linearity and a taken-for-granted humanist science, as well as get a sense of our ethical orientation; what we are doing right here and now, the places and faces of where we teach and live. In the process we hope to “be” where we stand and take a risk together.


Ethics Self Metalogue Treaty education Subjectivity 


  1. Badiou, A. (2014). Infinite thought: Truth and the return to philosophy. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bazzul, J., & Santavicca, N. (2017). Diagramming assemblages of sex/gender and sexuality as environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(1), 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light Pub.Google Scholar
  4. Donald, D. (2012). Forts, curriculum, and ethical relationality. Reconsidering Canadian curriculum studies: Provoking historical, present, and future perspectives (pp. 39–46). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foucault, M., Davidson, A. I., & Burchell, G. (2012). The courage of truth: The government of self and others II; Lectures at the Collège de France, 1983–1984 (Vol. 8). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Gough, N., Gough, A., Appelbaum, P., Appelbaum, S., Doll, M. A., & Sellers, W. (2003). Tales from camp wilde: Queer (y) ing environmental education research. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 8(1), 44–66.Google Scholar
  7. MacPherson, A. (2016). Student participation in anti-pipeline rally a ‘significant concern’: Greater Saskatoon Catholic Schools. Saskatoon Star Pheonix. Retrieved from:
  8. Newbery, L. (2012). Canoe pedagogy and colonial history: Exploring contested space of outdoor environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 17, 30–45.Google Scholar
  9. O’Riley, P., & Cole, P. (2009). Coyote and raven talk about the land/scapes. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, H. Bai, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Fields of green: Restorying culture, environment, and education (pp. 125–134). Creskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  10. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  11. Veracini, L. (2011). Introducing: Settler colonial studies. Settler colonial studies, 1(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ReginaReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations