Advertisement

A Critical Co/Autoethnographic Exploration of Self: Becoming Science Education Researchers in Diverse Cultural and Linguistic Landscapes

  • Jennifer C. Park
  • Sara E. D. Wilmes
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 17)

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the process of collaborative autoethnography (co-autoethnography) we used to construct space, in order to critically explore ourselves, and the contexts we study. Through a co-autoethnographic process, we aimed to better understand our positioning in our lived experiences and to generate an understanding of how reflective critical research approaches could transform us, as well as the communities in which we were immersed. In this chapter, we share the process of our collective analysis of autoethnographic narratives (Coia L, Taylor M, Co/autoethnography: Exploring our teaching selves collaboratively. In L. Fitzgerald, M. Heston, D. Tidwell (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. 3–16). Netherlands: Springer, 2009), which stemmed from our experiences living and conducting education research in multilingual and multicultural contexts. Our ethnographic method of data collection, analysis, and interpretation was generated from our journeys as researchers – moving to, living, and conducting research in culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) environments. We share this process, and some lessons we learned, with the hope that other researchers may find co-autoethnography a cathartic methodology to explore and challenge their own perspectives relative to cultural and linguistic diversity in their lives and in their research.

Keywords

Collaborative autoethnography Multicultural Multilingual Culturally and linguistically diverse Positionality Early career Newcomer 

References

  1. Ali-Kahn, C. (2011). Shaken and stirred: On coming to critical praxis. In T. Kress (Ed.), Critical praxis research: Breathing new life into research methods for teachers. Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1790-9_11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedictus, L., & Godwin, M. (2005 January 21). Every race, colour, nation, and religion on earth, The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/jan/21/britishidentity1.
  3. Coia, L., & Taylor, M. (2009). Co/autoethnography: Exploring our teaching selves collaboratively. In L. Fitzgerald, M. Heston, & D. Tidwell (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. 3–16). Netherlands: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9514-6_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36, 273–290.Google Scholar
  7. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
  8. Giampapa, F., & Lamoureux, S. A. (2011). Voices from the field: Identity, language, and power in multilingual research settings. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 10, 127–131.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2011.585301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  10. Harré, R., & Langenhove, L. V. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(4), 393–407.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1991.tb00203.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hermans, H., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hernandez, K.-A. C., Chang, H., & Ngunjiri, F. W. (2017). Collaborative autoethnography multivocal, relational, and democratic research: Opportunities, challenges, and aspirations. Auto/Biography Studies, 32(2), 251–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2017.1288892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin, S., Wassell, B., & Scantlebury, K. (2013). Frameworks for examining the intersections of race, ethnicity, class and gender: An analysis of research on English language learners in K-12 science education. In J. A. Bianchini, V. A. Akerson, A. Calabrese Barton, O. Lee, & A. J. Rodriguez (Eds.), Moving the equity agenda forward: Equity research, practice, and policy in science education (pp. 81–98). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ngunjiri, F. W., Hernandez, K. C., & Chang, H. (2010). Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), 1.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2017.1288892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tomlinson, J. (2003). Globalization and cultural identity. The global transformations reader, 2, 269–277.Google Scholar
  16. Vertovec, S. (2006). The emergence of super-diversity in Britain. ESRC Centre on Migration, Policy, and Society. Working paper No. 25 University of Oxford, 1–44.Google Scholar
  17. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wall, S. (2008). Easier said than done: Writing an autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(1), 38–53.  https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolcott, H. F. (2004). The ethnographic autobiography. Auto/Biography, 12(2), 93.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0967550704ab004oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer C. Park
    • 1
  • Sara E. D. Wilmes
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of LuxembourgLuxembourg CityLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations