Advertisement

Confronting Self: Stories of Incipiency, Disequilibrium, and Becoming Critical in Science Education

  • Darren HoegEmail author
  • Larry Bencze
  • Sarah El Halwany
  • Erin Sperling
  • Majd Zouda
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 17)

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss transformations of self during engagement in research and scholarship. Through personal stories, we describe self-transformational experiences involving incipiencies, disequilibrium, and retreat. We suggest these experiences result from tensions between new and existing perceptions and beliefs about the social settings in which we work and study. Our stories demonstrate what we believe is a necessary negotiation between the self and the external ‘other’ social reality we strive to change as we engage in critical scholarship.

Keywords

Citizenship Science education STSE Becoming Incipiency 

References

  1. Aoki, T. T. (1993). Legitimating lived curriculum: Towards a curricular landscape of multiplicity. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(3), 255–268.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, M. W. (2004). Series editor’s introduction. In W. M. Roth & A. Calabrese Barton (Eds.), Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  3. Bencze, J. L. (2017). Science & technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies & environments. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Bencze, J. L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students as socioscientific activists: Impetus from their primary & secondary research. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129–148.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9260-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bencze, L., Reiss, M., Sharma, A., & Weinstein, M. (2018). STEM education as ‘Trojan horse’: Deconstructed and reinvented for all. In L. Bryan, & K. Tobin (Eds.), Thirteen questions in science education (pp. 69–87). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (2004). What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue. In S. Salih (Ed.), The Judith Butler reader (pp. 302–322). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Calaprice, A. (2000). The expanded quotable Einstein. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Connolly, W. E. (2013). The ‘new materialism’ and the fragility of things. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 399–412.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813486849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. DenziN & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Giroux, H. (2008). Against the terror of neoliberalism: Politics beyond the age of greed. New York: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  11. Gough, A. (2015). STEM policy and science education: Scientific curriculum and sociopolitical silences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 445–458.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9590-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoeg, D. G., & Bencze, J. L. (2017). Values underpinning STEM education in the USA: An analysis of the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Education, 101(2), 278–301.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McMurtry, J. (1999). The cancer stage of capitalism. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  14. Mirowski, P. (2011). Science-mart: Privatizing American science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.  https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mueller, M. (2011). Ecojustice in science education: Leaving the classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(2), 351–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9333-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pierce, C. (2013). Education in the age of biocapitalism: Optimizing educational life for a flat world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137027832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A psychotherapists view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1086/229967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Springer, S., Birch, K., & MacLeavy, J. (Eds.). (2016). The handbook of neoliberalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century?: Sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 11–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren Hoeg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Larry Bencze
    • 2
  • Sarah El Halwany
    • 2
  • Erin Sperling
    • 2
  • Majd Zouda
    • 2
  1. 1.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.University of Toronto, OISETorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations