Advertisement

Maintaining Our Critical Work: Stories of Curriculum Making in Initial Teacher Education

  • Jenny MartinEmail author
  • Donna King
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 17)

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors reflect upon the process of curriculum making in initial teacher education. Even though they work in different states of Australia, Donna at Queensland University and Jenny at the Australian Catholic University in Victoria, they draw parallels in their experiences of implementing critical approaches to science education with preservice teachers at their respective institutions. Donna reflects upon her experience of facilitating an integrated assessment task and the institutional practices surrounding the course implementation. The task was successful in providing preservice teachers with the opportunity to take community action for environmental sustainability and to experience science learning through enquiry. Jenny reflects upon preservice teachers’ use of an online journal or blog to relate their learning in science to caring for the environment, self and others and her experiences of a course review process. The online environment was successful in demonstrating preservice teachers’ engagement with scientific ideas. Donna and Jenny show through their stories some of the passion and labor involved in maintaining what we value in our work and clarify the relational nature of such work.

Keywords

Initial teacher education Science teaching and learning Transformative approaches Curriculum in higher education Sociocultural theory 

References

  1. Apple, M. (2006). Educating the ‘Right’ way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. Hoboken: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Carter, L., Castano-Rodriguez, C., & Martin, J. (2018). Embedding ethics of care into primary science pedagogy: Reflections on our criticality. In J. Bazzul & C. Siry (Eds.), Critical voices in science education research: Narratives of academic journeys. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Carter, L., & Martin, J. (2018). “I had to take action straight away”. Pre-service teachers’ accounts of pro-environmental engagement. In J. L. Bencze (Ed.), Science & technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies & environments. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Castano Rodriguez, C. (In press). Challenging speciesism: Youth repositioning of identities as ethical adults. In G. Reis, M. P. Mueller, R. A. Luther, L. Siveres, & R. Oliveira (Eds.), Ociocultural perspectives on youth ethicalonsumerism. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Castano Rodriguez, C., Martin, J. (2015). Ethics of care in science. Report to Catholic Education, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, A. (2017). The dialectics of person and practice: How cultural-historical accounts of agency can inform teacher education. In J. Clandinen, & J. Husu (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher education. SAGE.Google Scholar
  7. King, D. (2014). Preparing pre-service teachers to teach primary science: An integrated approach using the theme of sustainability. Teaching Science, 60(4), 34–37.Google Scholar
  8. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Martin, J., & Carter, L. (2015). Preservice teacher agency concerning education for sustainability (EfS): A discursive psychological approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 560–573.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9412-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin, J., & Carter, L. (2018). “Finding ways to fill the void”: Preservice teachers struggling with their own consumption. In G. Reis, M. P. Mueller, R. A. Luther, L. Siveres, & R. Oliveira (Eds.), Sociocultural perspectives on youth ethical consumerism (pp. 19–32). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65608-3_2.Google Scholar
  11. Mitchell, C., Weber, S., & Yoshida, R. (2008). Where are the youth?: Reframing teacher education within the context of youth participation. In A. J. Sumsion (Ed.), Critical readings in teacher education: Provoking absences (pp. 139–154). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Stetsenko, A. (2014). Transformative activist stance for education: The challenge of inventing the future in moving beyond the status quo. In T. Corcoran (Ed.), Psychology in action (pp. 181–198). Sense: Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  13. Tilbury, D. (1995). Environmental education for sustainability: Defining the new focus of environmental education in the 1990s. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education and ArtsAustralian Catholic UniversityEast MelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations