Advertisement

The Power of Seeing in Problem Solving and Creativity: An Issue Under Discussion

  • Isabel ValeEmail author
  • Teresa Pimentel
  • Ana Barbosa
Chapter
Part of the Research in Mathematics Education book series (RME)

Abstract

This paper discusses some assumptions in the teaching and learning of problem solving, including the particular importance of a problem-solving strategy towards a visual solution, named seeing, which can be a complementary contribution to the approach and development of problem-solving abilities in students and its relation with mathematical creativity. In this path of stressing visual strategies and representations, we present and discuss different potentialities of visualization, as students use it to solve problems, pointing out some appropriate tasks to illustrate them, and we also underline some constraints of the use of visualization. Within problem solving, we make the connection between the use of visual solutions and mathematical creativity, which allows producing new and elegant solutions to a problem, clarifying and deepening the understanding of it, as well as suggesting productive paths for reasoning. Finally, we illustrate the ideas discussed based on examples emerging from some studies that we carried out with elementary pre-service teachers.

Keywords

Visualization Problem solving Creativity Strategies Visual solutions Intuition 

References

  1. Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbeau, E. (2009). Introduction. In E. J. Barbeau & P. J. Taylor (Eds.), Challenging mathematics in and beyond the classroom. The 16th ICMI Study (pp. 1–9). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Barbosa, A., & Vale, I. (2014). The impact of visualization on functional reasoning: The ability to generalize. RIPEM, 4(3), 29–44.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, A., & Janvier, C. (1981). The interpretation of graphs representing situations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2(1), 34–42.Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Chaim, D., Lappan, G., & Houang, R. (1989). Adolescent’s ability to communicate spatial information: Analyzing and effecting students’ performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20, 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borromeo Ferri, R. (2012). Mathematical Thinking styles and their influence on teaching and learning mathematics. Paper presented at the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Seul, Korea. Retrieved March, 2015 from http://www.icme12.org/upload /submission/1905_F.pdf.
  7. Burton, L. (1999). Why is intuition so important to mathematics but missing from mathematics education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 27–32.Google Scholar
  8. Cai, J., & Lester, F. (2010). Why is teaching with problem solving important to student learning? Research Brief, 14, 1–6.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, K., Watson, J., & Collis, K. (1995). Visual processing during mathematical problem-solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clements, M., & Del Campo, G. (1989). Linking verbal knowledge, visual images, and episodes for mathematical learning. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 25–33.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, P., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston: Birhäuser.Google Scholar
  12. Dreyfus, T. (1995). Imagery for diagrams. In R. Sutherland & J. Mason (Eds.), Exploiting mental imagery with computers in mathematics education (pp. 3–17). Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1986). On the aesthetics of mathematical thoughts. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(1), 2–10.Google Scholar
  14. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eisenberg, T., & Dreyfus, T. (1991). On visual versus analytical thinking in mathematics. In L. Burton & C. Hoyles (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 153–158). London.Google Scholar
  16. English, L., Lesh, R., & Fennewald, T. (2008). Future directions and perspectives for problem solving research and curriculum development. In M. Santos-Trigo & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), ICME, Topic Study Group 10, Research in Problem Solving in Mathematics Education (pp. 46–58). Monterrey, Mexico.Google Scholar
  17. Fischbein, H. (2002). Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Freiman, V., & Sriraman, B. (2007). Does mathematics gifted education need a working philosophy of creativity? Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6, 23–46.Google Scholar
  19. Gardner, M. (1978). Aha! insight. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  20. Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gutiérrez, A. (1996). Visualization in 3-dimensional geometry: In search of a framework. Proceedings of the 20th PME Conference, 1, 3–19.Google Scholar
  22. Guzmán, M. (1990). Aventuras matemáticas. Lisboa, Portugal: Gradiva.Google Scholar
  23. Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Hatfield, L. (1978). Heuristical emphases in the instruction of mathematical problem solving: Rationales and research. In L. Hatfield & A. Bradbard (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: Papers from a research workshop (pp. 21–42). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  25. Haylock, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in school children. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, Essence of Mathematics, 29(3), 68–74.Google Scholar
  26. Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hershkowitz, R. (1989). Visualization in geometry—Two sides of the coin. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 61–76.Google Scholar
  28. Hershkowitz, R., Arcavi, A., & Bruckheimer, M. (2001). Reflections on the status and nature of visual reasoning—The case of the matches. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(2), 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hershkowitz, R., Ben-Chaim, D., Hoyles, C., Lappan, G., Mitchelmore, M., & Vinner, S. (1990). Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 70–95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilpatrick, J. (1985). A retrospective account of the past twenty-five years of research on teaching mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 1–15). Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. Lester (Ed.), The second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Liljedahl, P. (2004). The AHA! Experience: Mathematical contexts, pedagogical implications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
  35. Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on mathematical creativity. For The Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 20–23.Google Scholar
  36. Mann, E. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  38. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2015). Procedural fluency in mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  39. Nelsen, R. (1993). Proofs without words. Washington, D.C.: MAA.Google Scholar
  40. Pehkonen, E. (1997). The state-of-the-art in mathematical creativity. ZDM, 29(3), 63–67.Google Scholar
  41. Pitta-Pantazi, D., Sophocleous, P., & Christou, C. (2013). Spatial visualizers, object visualizers and verbalizers: Their mathematical creative abilities. ZDM, 45(2), 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Presmeg, N. (1986). Visualization in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 42–46.Google Scholar
  44. Presmeg, N. (1999). Las posibilidades y peligros del pensamiento basado en imágenes en la resolución de problemas. Suma, 32, 17–22.Google Scholar
  45. Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Presmeg, N. (2014). Creative advantages of visual solutions to some non-routine mathematical problems. In S. Carreira, N. Amado, K. Jones, & H. Jacinto (Eds.), Proceedings of the Problem@Web International Conference: Technology, Creativity and Affect in Mathematical Problem Solving (pp. 156–167). Faro, Portugal: Universidade do Algarve.Google Scholar
  47. Rivera, F. (2011). Toward a visually-oriented school mathematics curriculum: Research, theory, practice, and issues. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schmitz, A., & Eichler, A. (2015). Teachers’ individual beliefs about the roles of visualization in classroom. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1266–1272). Prague, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
  49. Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Silver, E. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75–80.Google Scholar
  51. Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 268–275.Google Scholar
  52. Stylianides, G., & Silver, E. (2009). Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics: The case of pattern identification. In D. Stylianou, M. Blanton, & E. Knuth (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades - a K–16 perspective (pp. 235–248). New York: Routledge and Reston.Google Scholar
  53. Stylianou, D., & Silver, E. (2004). The role of visual representations in advanced mathematical problem solving: An examination of expert-novice similarities and differences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(4), 353–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vale, I., Barbosa, A., & Pimentel, T. (2014). Teaching and learning mathematics for creativity through challenging tasks. In S. Carreira, N. Amado, K. Jones, & H. Jacinto (Eds.), Proceedings of the Problem@Web International Conference: Technology, Creativity and Affect in mathematical problem solving (pp. 335–336). Faro, Portugal: Universidade do Algarve.Google Scholar
  55. Vale, I., & Pimentel, T. (2004). Resolução de Problemas. In P. Palhares (Coord.), Elementos da Matemática para professores do Ensino Básico (pp. 7–52). Lisboa, Portugal: Lidel.Google Scholar
  56. Vale, I., & Pimentel, T. (2011). Mathematical challenging tasks in elementary grades. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1154–1164). Rzeszow, Poland: ERME.Google Scholar
  57. Vale, I., Pimentel, T., Cabrita, I., Barbosa, A., & Fonseca, L. (2012). Pattern problem solving tasks as a mean to foster creativity in mathematics. In T. Y. Tso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 171–178). Taipei, Taiwan: PME.Google Scholar
  58. Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  59. Whitley, W. (2004). Visualization in mathematics: Claims and questions towards a research program. Retrieved February, 2015 from http://www.math.yorku.ca/~whiteley/ Visualization.pdf.
  60. Yerushalmy, M., & Chazan, D. (1990). Overcoming visual obstacles with the aid of the supposer. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zimmermann, W., & Cunningham, S. (1991). Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  62. Zodik, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2007). Is a visual example in geometry always helpful? In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 265–272). Seoul, South Korea: PME.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education of the Polytechnic Institute of Viana do CasteloViana do CasteloPortugal
  2. 2.Escola Secundária de Santa Maria Maior de Viana do CasteloViana do CasteloPortugal

Personalised recommendations