Proving Ground Confluence of Equational Specifications Modulo Axioms
- 160 Downloads
Terminating functional programs should be deterministic, i.e., should evaluate to a unique result, regardless of the evaluation order. For equational functional programs such determinism is exactly captured by the ground confluence property. For terminating equations this is equivalent to ground local confluence, which follows from local confluence. Checking local confluence by computing critical pairs is the standard way to check ground confluence. The problem is that some perfectly reasonable equational programs are not locally confluent and it can be very hard or even impossible to make them so by adding more equations. We propose a three-step strategy to prove that an equational program as is is ground confluent: First: apply the strategy proposed in  to use non-joinable critical pairs as completion hints to either achieve local confluence or reduce the number of critical pairs. Second: use the inductive inference system proposed in this paper to prove the remaining critical pairs ground joinable. Third: to show ground confluence of the original specification, prove also ground joinable the equations added. These methods apply to order-sorted and possibly conditional equational programs modulo axioms such as, e.g., Maude functional modules.
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their helpful comments that helped us improve the paper. The first author was partially supported by Spanish MINECO/FEDER project TIN2014-52034-R and Univ. Málaga, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech. The second author was partially supported by NRL under contract number N00173-17-1-G002. The third author was partially supported by CAPES, Colciencias, and INRIA via the STIC AmSud project “EPIC: EPistemic Interactive Concurrency” (Proc. No 88881.117603/2016-01).
- 5.Dershowitz, N., Jouannaud, J.-P.: Rewrite systems. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 243–320. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
- 10.Durán, F., Meseguer, J., Rocha, C.: Proving ground confluence of equational specifications modulo axioms. Technical report 2142/99548, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA, March 2018Google Scholar
- 11.Durán, F., Rocha, C., Álvarez, J.M.: Towards a Maude formal environment. In: Agha, G., Danvy, O., Meseguer, J. (eds.) Formal Modeling: Actors, Open Systems, Biological Systems. LNCS, vol. 7000, pp. 329–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24933-4_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Nakamura, M., Ogata, K., Futatsugi, K.: Incremental proofs of termination, confluence and sufficient completeness of OBJ specifications. In: Iida, S., Meseguer, J., Ogata, K. (eds.) Specification, Algebra, and Software. LNCS, vol. 8373, pp. 92–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54624-2_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar