Advertisement

Pain Imaging pp 323-346 | Cite as

Imaging of Bowel Obstruction and Bowel Perforation

  • Francesca Iacobellis
  • Ettore Laccetti
  • Federica Romano
  • Michele Altiero
  • Mariano Scaglione
Chapter

Abstract

Bowel obstruction and bowel perforation are common causes of acute abdominal pain. Clinical presentation may be insidious, and results of physical examination and laboratory values are often nonspecific and nondiagnostic. Thus, an imaging assessment is required. The target of the radiological evaluation is to define the etiology, to detect signs suggesting for immediate surgery, or to help the surgeon in deciding the correct timing of intervention. In this chapter, the diagnostic approach of these two conditions and the related main imaging findings are discussed.

Keywords

Bowel obstruction Bowel occlusion Bowel perforation Pneumoperitoneum Acute abdomen 

Supplementary material

Video 17.1

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with acute complicated appendicitis (same patient of Fig. 17.2). The appendix is fluid distended, with an appendicolith in the lumen. There is a wall discontinuity with adjacent abscess extending in the pelvis. Due to reactive inflammatory phenomena there are several enlarged lymph nodes in the ileo-cecal region and thickening of the sigmoid wall. (MOV 17081 kb)

Video 17.2

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with closed-loop bowel obstruction 3 years after appendectomy (same patient of Fig. 17.5). A cluster of fluid distended small bowel loops in the right iliac fossa show thickened walls and decreased enhancement, consistent with closed-loop obstruction complicated with ischemic changes, due to postoperative adhesions. The dilated bowel loops proximal to the obstruction show fecaloid content due to dehydration of bowel content. (MOV 13595 kb)

Video 17.3

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with incarcerated laparocele (same patient of Fig. 17.6). There are ischemic changes of the herniated loops with a small amount of fluid in the herniated sac. Note also the presence of gas within the small venous mesenteric vessels and in intrahepatic portal system in keeping with pneumatosis. (MOV 18068 kb)

Video 17.4

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with bowel obstruction and perforation (same patient of Fig. 17.7). There is large pneumoperitoneum due to perforation related with an obstructing stenotizing mass of the splenic flexure. (MOV 20033 kb)

Video 17.5

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with bowel obstruction and previous history of right hemicolectomy (same patient of Fig. 17.8). There are signs of mechanical obstruction of the jejunum due to adhesions. A cluster of small bowel loops show dilated lumen with multiple valvulae conniventes. Some of the bowel loop are thinned with preserved enhancement whereas others are thickened with decreased enhancement due to ischemic bowel changes. (MOV 27921 kb)

Video 17.6

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with bowel obstruction and previous history of cholelithiasis (same patient of Fig. 17.9). The gallbladder shows thickened walls and air bubbles in its lumen. Signs of mechanical bowel obstruction are present, due to the presence of a gallstone in the small bowel lumen. (MOV 20226 kb)

Video 17.7

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with bowel obstruction due to sigmoid volvolus (same patient of Fig. 17.10). There are signs of mechanical bowel obstruction with an abnormal distension of the colonic lumen till the sigma, where a narrowing of the lumen and twisted mesenteric vessel are depicted. (MOV 15542 kb)

Video 17.8

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with bowel perforation (same patient of Fig. 17.11). The pneumoperitoneum is due to perforation of the ventral wall of the first duodenal loop. (MOV 14502 kb)

Video 17.9

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with bowel perforation (same patient of Fig. 17.12). The pneumoperitoneum is related with perforation of the pyloroduodenal junction. Signs of peritonitis are also present with thickening of bowel loops and free fluid in the abdomen. (MOV 16033 kb)

Video 17.10

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with bowel perforation 3 days after gastrectomy (same patient of Fig. 17.13). There is a large amount of extraluminal air with a “dirty mass” around the III portion of the duodenum. (MOV 13688 kb)

Video 17.11

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with gastric wall dehiscence after gastric bypass and esophageal endoprosthesis (same patient of Fig. 17.14). There is extravasation of oral contrast at the level of the anastomosis in the surrounding tissue, due to dehiscence. (MOV 19981 kb)

Video 17.12

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with bowel perforation (same patient of Fig. 17.15). There is free air in the lesser sac and above the right liver, due to a defect of the ventral wall of the duodenal bulb. The mesentery is congested with free fluid in the pelvis due to the inflammation. (MOV 11755 kb)

Video 17.13

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with diverticulitis (same patient of Fig. 17.16). There are multiple sigmoid diverticula with wall thickening, pericolic fat stranding and perivisceral free bubbles due to covered diverticular perforation. (MOV 11602 kb)

Video 17.14

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with complicated colonic neoplasm (same patient of Fig. 17.17). There is a large colonic mass at the splenic flexure with some peripheral low fluid hypodensities consistent with abscesses. These findings are keeping with a complicated colonic neoplasm. (MOV 13629 kb)

Video 17.15

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast acquired in a patient with known diverticulitis (same patient of Fig. 17.18). Large amount of free air was detected in the retroperitoneal space due sigmoid diverticular perforation connected to an abscess collection. (MOV 17543 kb)

Video 17.16

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with perforated diverticulitis (same patient of Fig. 17.19). There are multiple sigmoid diverticula with wall submucosal thickening. Note the wall discontinuity with associated extraluminal dirty mass. A small amount of free air is also present. (MOV 11699 kb)

Video 17.17

CT abdomen and pelvis with contrast of a patient with perforated sigmoid mass (same patient of Fig. 17.20). There is an inhomogeneous thickening of the sigmoid colon with perivisceral inflammation and free air due to perforation. (MOV 14761 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Scaglione M, Linsenmaier U, Schueller G. Emergency radiology of the Abdomen. Diagnostic imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loo JT, Duddalwar V, Chen FK, Tejura T, Lekht I, Gulati M. Abdominal radiograph pearls and pitfalls for the emergency department radiologist: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol. 2017;42(4):987–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scrima A. Value of MDCT and clinical and laboratory data for predicting the need for surgical intervention in suspected small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208(4):785–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gore RM, Silvers RI, Thakrar KH, Wenzke DR, Mehta UK, Newmark GM, Berlin JW. Bowel obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015;53(6):1225–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Mizio R, D’Amario F, Di Mizio V, Colasante MA, D’Amico G, Maggi G, Innocenti P, Scaglione M. In: Di Mizio R, Scaglione M, editors. Ileo meccanico del tenue. Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grassi R, Cappabianca S, Porto A, Sacco M, Montemarano E, Quarantelli M, Di Mizio R, De Rosa R. Ogilvie’s syndrome (acute colonic pseudo-obstruction): review of the literature and report of 6 additional cases. Radiol Med. 2005;109(4):370–5. Review. English, Italian.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vilz TO, Stoffels B, Strassburg C, Schild HH, Kalff JC. Ileus in adults. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(29–30):508–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaffe T, Thompson WM. Large-bowel obstruction in the adult: classic radiographic and CT findings, etiology, and mimics. Radiology. 2015;275(3):651–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Mizio V, Di Mizio R, Romano L, Pinto A, D’Amario F, Gagliardi N, Scaglione M, Silva M. Ileo Meccanico. In: Di Mizio R, Scaglione M, editors. TCMD del piccolo intestino in elezione ed urgenza. Verduci Editore; 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Di Mizio R, Scaglione M, editors. Small-bowel obstruction CT features with plain film and US correlations. Springer; 2007. p. 2012.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paulson EK, Thompson WM. Review of small-bowel obstruction: the diagnosis and when to worry. Radiology. 2015;275(2):332–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Somma F, Faggian A, Serra N, Gatta G, Iacobellis F, Berritto D, et al. Bowel intussusceptions in adults: the role of imaging. Radiol Med. 2015;120(1):105–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rami Reddy SR, Cappell MS. A systematic review of the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of small bowel obstruction. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;19(6):28.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Federle MP. CT of the acute (emergency) abdomen. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(Suppl 4):D100–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dubuisson V, Voïglio EJ, Grenier N, Le Bras Y, Thoma M, Launay-Savary MV. Imaging of non-traumatic abdominal emergencies in adults. J Visc Surg. 2015;152(6):S57–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gangadhar K, Kielar A, Dighe MK, O’Malley R, Wang C, Gross JA, Itani M, Lalwani N. Multimodality approach for imaging of non-traumatic acute abdominal emergencies. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016;41(1):136–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nicolaou S, Kai B, Ho S, Su J, Ahamed K. Imaging of acute small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(4):1036–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Di Mizio R, Di Mizio V, Della Marra R, Di Rocco D, Sciarra R, Grassi R. Radiological correlations. Chapter 5. In: Di Mizio R, Scaglione M, editors. Small-bowel obstruction CT features with plain film and US correlations. Springer; 2007. p. 75–111.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burgess LK, Lee JT, DiSantis DJ. The string of pearls sign. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016;41(7):1435–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grassi R, Di Mizio R, Pinto A, Romano L, Rotondo A. Serial plain abdominal film findings in the assessment of acute abdomen: spastic ileus, hypotonic ileus, mechanical ileus and paralytic ileus. Radiol Med. 2004;108(1–2):56–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grassi R, Romano S, D’Amario F, Giorgio Rossi A, Romano L, Pinto F, Di Mizio R. The relevance of free fluid between intestinal loops detected by sonography in the clinical assessment of small bowel obstruction in adults. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(1):5–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Di Mizio R, Grassi R, Marchese E, Basti M, Di Campli G, Catalano O, Rotondo A, Fanucci A. “Uncompensated” small bowel obstruction in adults. Ultrasonographic findings of free fluid between loops and its prognostic value. Radiol Med. 1995;89(6):787–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iacobellis F, Iadevito I, Romano F, Altiero M, Bhattacharjee B, Scaglione M. Perforated appendicitis: assessment with multidetector computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2016;37(1):31–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lassandro F, Giovine S, Pinto A, De Lutio Di Castelguidone E, Sacco M, Scaglione M, Romano L. Small bowell volvulus - combined radiological findings. Radiol Med. 2001;102(1–2):43–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grassi R, Pinto A, Scaglione M, Ragozzino A, Gagliardi N, Pellegrino G, Amitrano M. Volvulus of the splenic flexure of the colon. Report of a case. Radiol Med. 1997;93(6):783–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scaglione M, Grassi R, Pinto A, Giovine S, Gagliardi N, Stavolo C, Romano L. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of spiral CT in the diagnosis of closed loop obstruction complicated by intestinal ischemia. Radiol Med. 2004;107(1–2):69–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Caracino V, D’Amico G, Di Mizio R, D’Amario F. Rare cases of bowel obstruction: internal hernias. Chir Ital. 2009;61(5–6):617–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scaglione M, Romano S, Pinto F, Flagiello F, Farina R, Acampora C, Romano L. Helical CT diagnosis of small bowel obstruction in the acute clinical setting. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(1):15–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Iacobellis F, Berritto D, Belfiore MP, Di Lanno I, Maiorino M, Saba L, Grassi R. Meaning of free intraperitoneal fluid in small-bowel obstruction: preliminary results using high-frequency microsonography in a rat model. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(5):887–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wongwaisayawan S, Kaewlai R, Dattwyler M, Abujudeh HH, Singh AK. Magnetic resonance of pelvic and gastrointestinal emergencies. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2016;24(2):419–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Del Gaizo AJ, Lall C, Allen BC, Leyendecker JR. From esophagus to rectum: a comprehensive review of alimentary tract perforations at computed tomography. Abdom Imaging. 2014;39(4):802–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Furukawa A, Sakoda M, Yamasaki M, Kono N, Tanaka T, Nitta N, et al. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: CT diagnosis of presence, site, and cause. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30(5):524–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Faggian A, Berritto D, Iacobellis F, Reginelli A, Cappabianca S, Grassi R. Imaging patients with alimentary tract perforation: literature review. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2016;37(1):66–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stoker J, van Randen A, Laméris W, Boermeester MA. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology. 2009;253(1):31–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Scaglione M, Linsenmaier U, Schueller G. Emergency radiology of the abdomen imaging features and differential diagnosis for a timely management approach. Milan/New York: Springer; 2012.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brown CVR. Small bowel and colon perforation. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94:471–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grassi R, Pinto A, Rossi G, Rotondo A. Conventional plain-film radiology, ultrasonography and CT in jejuno-ileal perforation. Acta Radiol. 1998;39(1):52–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pinto A, Grassi R, Rossi G, Romano L, Scaglione M, Pinto F. Computerized tomography in the study of jejuno-ileal perforations. Personal case load. Radiol Med. 1998;96(6):602–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Romano F, Iacobellis F, Guida F, Laccetti E, Sorbo A, Grassi R, Scaglione M. Traumatic injuries: mechanisms of lesions. In: Miele V., Trinci M, editors. Diagnostic imaging in Polytrauma patients. Springer; 2018.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pinto A, Magliocca M, Grassi R, Scaglione M, Romano L, Angelelli G. Role of computerized tomography in the diagnosis of peritoneo-intestinal lesions resulting from closed trauma. Experience at 2 emergency departments. Radiol Med. 2001;101(3):177–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pinto A, Muzj C, Stavolo C, Pepe M, Cinque T, Romano L. Pictorial essay: foreign body of the gastrointestinal tract in emergency radiology. Radiol Med. 2004;107(3):145–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pinto A, Reginelli A, Pinto F, Sica G, Scaglione M, Berger FH, et al. Radiological and practical aspects of body packing. Br J Radiol. 2014;7(1036):20130500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rossi G, Grassi R, Pinto A, Ragozzino A, Romano L. New computerized tomography sign of intestinal infarction: isolated pneumoretroperitoneum or associated with pneumoperitoneum or late findings of intestinal infarction. Radiol Med. 1998;95(5):474–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Grassi R, Pinto A, Rossi G. Isolated pneumoretroperitoneum secondary to acute bowel infarction. Clin Radiol. 2000;55(4):321–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Scaglione M, de Lutio di Castelguidone E, Scialpi M, Merola S, Diettrich AI, Lombardo P, et al. Blunt trauma to the gastrointestinal tract and mesentery: is there a role for helical CT in the decision-making process? Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(1):67–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Espinoza R, Rodriguez A. Traumatic and non traumatic perforation of hollow viscera. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(6):1291–13042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pinto A, Miele V, Schillirò ML, Nasuto M, Chiaese V, Romano L, Guglielmi G. Spectrum of signs of pneumoperitoneum. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2016;37(1):3–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
  49. 49.
    Grassi R, Romano S, Pinto A, Romano L. Gastro-duodenal perforations: conventional plain film, US and CT findings in 166 consecutive patients. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(1):30–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Smith JE, Hall EJ. The use of plain abdominal x rays in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(3):160–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Reginelli A, Mandato Y, Solazzo A, Berritto D, Iacobellis F, Grassi R. Errors in the radiological evaluation of the alimentary tract: part II. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012;33(4):308–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chen SC, Yen ZS, Wang HP, Lin FY, Hsu CY, Chen WJ. Ultrasonography is superior to plain radiography in the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg. 2002;89:351–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hefny AF, Abu-Zidan FM. Sonographic diagnosis of intraperitoneal free air. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011;4(4):511–3.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Miller RE, Nelson SW. The roentgenologic demonstration of tiny amounts of free intraperitoneal gas: experimental and clinical studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1971;112:574–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Singh JP, Steward MJ, Booth TC, Mukhtar H, Murray D. Evolution of imaging for abdominal perforation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:182–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pendergrass EP, Kirk E. Significance of gas under right dome of diaphragm with discussion of hepatoptosis. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;22:238–46.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Woodring JH, Heiser MJ. Detection of pneu- moperitoneum on chest radiographs: comparison of upright lateral and posteroanterior projections. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(1):45–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Baker SR. Plain film radiology of the perito- neal and retroperitoneal spaces. In: Baker SR, editor. The abdominal plain film. Norwalk/San Mateo: Appleton & Lange; 1990. p. 71–125.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Grassi R, Pinto F, Rotondo A, Smaltino F. Pneumoperitoneo. Napoli: Guido Gnocchi; 1996.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Weiner CI, Diaconis JN, Dennis JM. The inverted V: a new sign of pneumoperitoneum. Radiology. 1973;107:47–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Riegler LG. Spontaneous pneumoperitoneum: a roentgenologic sign found in the supine position. Radiology. 1941;37:604–7.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Cho KC, Baker SR. Extraluminal air diagnosis and significance. Radiol Clin North Am. 1994;32:829–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cho KC, Baker SR. Air in the fissure for the ligamentum teres: new sign of intraperitoneal air on plain radiographs. Radiology. 1991;178:489–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Radin R, Van Allan RJ, Rosen RS. The visible gallbladder: a plain film sign of pneumoperitoneum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:69–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Brill PW, Olson SR, Winchester P. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: air in Morison pouch. Radiology. 1990;174:469–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Menuck L, Siemers PT. Pneumoperitoneum: importance of right upper quadrant features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976;127:753–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cho KC, Baker SR. Depiction of diaphragmatic muscle slips on supine plain radiographs: a sign of pneumoperitoneum. Radiology. 1997;203:431–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Han SY. Variations in falciform ligament with pneumoperitoneum. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1880;31:171–3.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Cho KC, Baker SR. Visualization of the extra- hepatic segment of the ligamentum teres: a sign of free air on plain radiographs. Radiology. 1997;202:651–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Jelaso DV, Schultz EH. The urachus – an aid to the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum. Radiology. 1969;92:295–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Grassi R, Catalano O, Pinto A, Fanucci A, Rotondo A, Di Mizio R. Case report: identification of the transverse mesocolon and root of small bowel mesentery; a new sign of pneumoperitoneum. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:774–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Miller RE. Perforated viscus in infants: a new roentgen sign. Radiology. 1960;74:65–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Rampton JW. The football sign. Radiology. 2004;231:81–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Mindelzun RE, McCort JJ. The cupola sign of pneumoperitoneum in the supine patient. Gastrointest Radiol. 1986;11:283–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Romano L, Pinto A, editors. Imaging of alimentary tract perforation. Cham: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Merchea A, Cullinane DC, Sawyer MD, Iqbal CW, Baron TH, Wigle D, Sarr MG, Zielinski MD. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy-associated gastrointestinal perforations: a single-center experience. Surgery. 2010;148:876–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Solis CV, Chang Y, De Moya MA, Velmahos GC, Fagenholz PJ. Free air on plainfilm: do we need a computed tomography too? J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2014;7(1):3–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Grassi R, Di Mizio R, Pinto A, Cioffi A, Romano L, Rotondo A. Sixty-one consecutive patients with gastrointestinal perforation: comparison of conventional radiology, ultrasonography, and computerized tomography, in terms of the timing of the study. Radiol Med. 1996;91(6):747–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Puylaert J, van der Zant F, Rijke A. Sonography and the acute abdomen: practical considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:179–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lee DH, Lim JH, Ko YT, Yoon Y. Sonographic detection of pneumoperitoneum in patients with acute abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:107–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Coppolino F, Gatta G, Di Grezia G, Reginelli A, Iacobellis F, Vallone G, et al. Gastrointestinal perforation: ultrasonographic diagnosis. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ghaffar A, Siddiqui TS, Haider H, Khatri H. Postsurgical pneumoperitoneum – comparison of abdominal ultrasound findings with plain radiography. J Coll Phys Surg Pak. 2008;18:477–80.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Karahan O, Kurt A, Yikilmaz A, Kahriman G. New method for the detection of Intraperitoneal free air by sonography: scissors maneuver. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;32:381–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Maniatis V, Chryssikopoulos H, Roussakis A, Kalamara C, Papadopoulos A, Andreou J, Stringaris K. Perforation of the alimentary tract: evaluation with com- puted tomography. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:373–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Cadenas Rodríguez L, Martí de Gracia M, Saturio Galán N, Pérez Dueñas V, Salvatierra Arrieta L, Garzón Moll G. Use of multidetector computed tomography for locating the site of gastrointestinal tract perforations. Cir Esp. 2013;91:316–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kunin JR, Korobkin M, Ellis JH, Francis IR, Kane NM, Siegel SE. Duodenal injuries caused by blunt abdominal trauma: value of CT in differentiating perforation from hematoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:1221–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kim SH, Shin SS, Jeong YY, Heo SH, Kim JW, Kang HK. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: MDCT findings according to the perforation sites. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10(1)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Imuta M, Awai K, Nakayama Y, Murata Y, Asao C, Matsukawa T, Yamashita Y. Multidetector CT findings suggesting a perforation site in the gastrointestinal tract: analysis in surgically confirmed 155 patients. Radiat Med. 2007;25:113–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Gerhardt RT, Nelson BK, Keenan S, Kernan L, MacKersie A, Lane MS. Derivation of a clinical guideline for the assessment of nonspecific abdominal pain: the guideline for abdominal pain in the ED setting (GAPEDS) phase 1 study. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23:709–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Hainaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R, De Maertelaer V, Rubesova E, Capelluto E, Moschopoulos C. Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1179–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Shaffer HA. Perforation and obstruction of the gastrointestinal tract. Assessment by conventional radiology. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992;30:405–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Meyers MA. The extraperitoneal space: normal and pathologic anatomy. In: Meyers MA, editor. Dynamic radiology of the abdomen. New York: Springer; 2000. p. 333–492.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Badgwell BD, Camp ER, Feig B, Wolff RA, Eng C, Ellis LM, Cormier JN. Management of bevacizumab associated bowel perforation: a case series and review of the literature. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:577–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Brofman N, Atri M, Hanson JM, Grinblat L, Chughtai T, Brenneman F. Evaluation of bowel and mesenteric blunt trauma with multidetector CT. Radiographics. 2006;26:1119–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Scaglione M, Romano L, Gagliardi N, Palumbo P, Diettrich AI, Vicenzo L. Pneumoperitoneum secondary to blunt trauma of the thorax: report of a case of clinical and radiologic significance. Radiol Med. 1997;93(1–2):136–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Romano L, Rossi G, Pinto A, Grassi R, Violini M. A case of tracheal rupture caused by blunt trauma associated with pneumoretroperitoneum and intraspinal gas. Radiol Med. 1996;92(5):642–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Sung HK, Sang SS, Jeong YY, et al. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: MDCT findings according to the perforation sites. Korean. J Radiol. 2009;10:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Haianaux B, Agneessens E, Bertinotti R, De Maertelaer V, Rubesova E, Capelluto E, Moschopoulos C. Accuracy of MDCT in predicting site of gastrointestinal tract perforation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(5):1179–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Biondo S, Kreisler E, Millan M, Fraccalvieri D, Golda T, Martí Ragué J, Salazar R. Differences in patient postoperative and long-term outcomes between obstructive and perforated colonic cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;195:427–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Liguori P, Reginelli A, Sparano A, Ruggiero G, Pinto A. Pneumoretroperitoneum associated with “Dirty Mass”: an unusual case of rectal perforation. Radiol Case Rep. 2016;2(1):22–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Rubesin SE, Levine MS. Radiologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:1095–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Iacobellis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ettore Laccetti
    • 1
  • Federica Romano
    • 1
  • Michele Altiero
    • 1
  • Mariano Scaglione
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Imaging“Pineta Grande” HospitalCastel Volturno (CE)Italy
  2. 2.Department of General and Emergency Radiology“A. Cardarelli” HospitalNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of RadiologySunderland Royal Hospital, NHSSunderlandUK

Personalised recommendations